Mendes António de O, Vieira Joana C, Carta Ana M, Curto Joana M R, Amaral Maria E, Costa Ana P, Fiadeiro Paulo T
Fiber Materials and Environmental Technologies Research Unit (FibEnTech-UBI), University da Beira Interior, R. Marquês D'Ávila e Bolama, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal.
Forest and Paper Research Institute (RAIZ), R. José Estevão, Eixo, 3800-783 Aveiro, Portugal.
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jan 7;18(2):228. doi: 10.3390/ma18020228.
In this work, four different experimental assessment approaches, namely, the Tissue Softness Analyzer (TSA), a Subjective Evaluation (SUB), the Kawabata Evaluation System (KES), and an Optical System (OPT), were used for the evaluation of softness on a set of 29 different tissue paper products. After processing and the interpretation of the results given by each one of the used methods, a procedure was implemented in the current work to make a comparison between them. The procedure consists in tracking the position of the tissue paper products on a ranking table, regardless of what values were obtained through each one of the four used methods independently. This comparison revealed to be very useful in determining the differences verified between methods allowing to conclude which ones were the least and the most concordant, and, at the same time, enabling us to identify interesting cases of tissue paper products on the set that caught our attention for their distinctive characteristics.
在这项工作中,使用了四种不同的实验评估方法,即组织柔软度分析仪(TSA)、主观评价(SUB)、川端评价系统(KES)和光学系统(OPT),来评估一组29种不同卫生纸产品的柔软度。在对所使用的每种方法给出的结果进行处理和解释之后,在当前工作中实施了一个程序来对它们进行比较。该程序包括跟踪卫生纸产品在排名表上的位置,而不管通过独立使用的四种方法中的每一种获得了什么值。这种比较在确定方法之间验证的差异方面非常有用,从而可以得出哪些方法一致性最低和最高,同时,使我们能够在所研究的卫生纸产品集中识别出因其独特特征而引起我们注意的有趣案例。