Suppr超能文献

通过疼痛机制对腰痛进行分类:物理治疗实践的范围综述

Classifying Low Back Pain Through Pain Mechanisms: A Scoping Review for Physiotherapy Practice.

作者信息

Tedeschi Roberto, Giorgi Federica, Platano Daniela, Berti Lisa

机构信息

Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy.

Pediatric Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, 40121 Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 10;14(2):412. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020412.

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide, often driven by distinct pain mechanisms: nociceptive, neuropathic, and central sensitization. Accurate classification of these mechanisms is critical for guiding effective, targeted treatments. A scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, PEDro, and Web of Science. Eligible studies included adults with LBP and focused on clinical criteria for classifying pain mechanisms. Data on study methods, population characteristics, and outcomes were extracted and synthesized. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Nociceptive pain was characterized by localized symptoms proportional to mechanical triggers, with no neurological signs. Neuropathic pain was associated with burning sensations, dysaesthesia, and a positive neurodynamic straight leg raise (SLR) test. Central sensitization featured widespread pain, hyperalgesia, and disproportionate symptoms. Tools such as painDETECT, DN4, and the Central Sensitisation Inventory (CSI) were validated for neuropathic and central sensitization pain. Central sensitization and neuropathic pain were linked to greater disability and psychological distress compared to nociceptive pain. This review aims to provide a historical perspective on pain mechanism classifications and to explore how previous frameworks have influenced current diagnostic concepts in physiotherapy practice. By synthesizing key clinical criteria used to differentiate between nociceptive, neuropathic, and central sensitization pain, this review proposes a practical framework to improve the accuracy of pain classification in clinical settings.

摘要

腰痛(LBP)是全球致残的主要原因,通常由不同的疼痛机制驱动:伤害性疼痛、神经性疼痛和中枢敏化。准确分类这些机制对于指导有效、有针对性的治疗至关重要。按照乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的方法进行了一项范围综述,并根据PRISMA-ScR指南进行报告。在MEDLINE、Cochrane CENTRAL、Scopus、PEDro和科学网中进行了全面的文献检索。符合条件的研究包括患有腰痛的成年人,并侧重于疼痛机制分类的临床标准。提取并综合了有关研究方法、人群特征和结果的数据。九项研究符合纳入标准。伤害性疼痛的特征是与机械性触发因素成比例的局部症状,且无神经学体征。神经性疼痛与烧灼感、感觉异常以及神经动力学直腿抬高(SLR)试验阳性有关。中枢敏化的特征是广泛疼痛、痛觉过敏和不成比例的症状。疼痛DETECT、DN4和中枢敏化量表(CSI)等工具在神经性和中枢敏化性疼痛方面得到了验证。与伤害性疼痛相比,中枢敏化和神经性疼痛与更大的残疾和心理困扰有关。本综述旨在提供关于疼痛机制分类的历史视角,并探讨先前的框架如何影响物理治疗实践中当前的诊断概念。通过综合用于区分伤害性、神经性和中枢敏化性疼痛的关键临床标准,本综述提出了一个实用框架,以提高临床环境中疼痛分类的准确性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验