• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Public value and digital health: The example of guiding values in the national digital health strategy of France.

作者信息

Lewerenz Simon, Moen Anne, Martins Henrique

机构信息

ISCTE-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.

Institute for Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Norwegian Center for eHealth Research, Tromsø, Norway.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2025 Apr;196:105794. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105794. Epub 2025 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105794
PMID:39862565
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In the WHO European Region, 44 of 53 reporting Member States (MS) have a national digital health strategy (NDHS) or policy. Their formulation is heterogenous and evolving and should best reflect public common interest. This research aims to explore how a public value approach improves the relevance of digital health policies and services, increasing their capacity to better serve the diverse range of societal interests. It utilises the guiding values within the French NDHS as an example before discussing other digital health policies such as the European Heath Data Space.

METHODS

Three homogenous focus group discussions were conducted in November and December 2023. Each focus group separately gathered distinct stakeholders: public clients, health professionals, private sector. 19 participants were included in the study. Data collection comprised live polling and semi-structured discussion. Results were analysed considering the pre-defined stakeholder groups and the values discussed during the study.

RESULTS

Findings reveal both technical and cultural challenges in digital health that highlight the need for adaptable frameworks across different contexts. Stakeholder insights informed a framework classifying public values into democratic and managerial categories, suggesting themes that may be relevant to digital health strategies in other national and regional settings.

DISCUSSION

Public value is discussed as a multidimensional concept, and the plurality of its perceptions give basis for tailored approaches to serve different value-beneficiaries comprehensively. We propose this values-based approach as a systematic model for supra-, sub-, and national scales and additional policy topics, beyond digital health strategies.

CONCLUSION

The study suggests that using a public value lens considering multiple perceptions is valuable for advancing digital health policy in a responsible and ethical manner. Such an approach could promote wider governance of and adoption of digital health. To evolve the framework, application in multiple and large ecosystems at different levels should be considered.

摘要

相似文献

1
Public value and digital health: The example of guiding values in the national digital health strategy of France.
Int J Med Inform. 2025 Apr;196:105794. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105794. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
2
Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review.公共部门改革及其对腐败程度的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;17(2):e1173. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1173. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
Unlocking data: Decision-maker perspectives on cross-sectoral data sharing and linkage as part of a whole-systems approach to public health policy and practice.解锁数据:决策者对跨部门数据共享与关联的看法,这是公共卫生政策与实践全系统方法的一部分。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Nov 20:1-30. doi: 10.3310/KYTW2173.
4
Digital health policy decoded: Mapping national strategies using Donabedian's model.数字健康政策解码:利用 Donabedian 模型绘制国家战略图谱。
Health Policy. 2024 Sep;147:105134. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105134. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
5
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
6
Digital First Primary Care for those with multiple long-term conditions: a rapid review of the views of stakeholders.针对多种慢性病患者的数字优先初级保健:利益相关者观点的快速综述。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(21):1-68. doi: 10.3310/AWBT4827.
7
Australia in 2030: what is our path to health for all?2030 年的澳大利亚:全民健康之路在何方?
Med J Aust. 2021 May;214 Suppl 8:S5-S40. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51020.
8
Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study.当前在英格兰促进获取数字国民保健服务初级保健服务的经验和未来潜力:Di-Facto 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(32):1-197. doi: 10.3310/JKYT5803.
9
Challenges for remote patient monitoring programs in rural and regional areas: a qualitative study.农村和偏远地区远程患者监测项目面临的挑战:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 13;25(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12427-z.
10
Identification and Categorization of the Distinct Purposes Underpinning the Use of Digital Health Care Self-Monitoring: Qualitative Study of Stakeholders in the Health Care Ecosystem.数字医疗自我监测使用背后不同目的的识别与分类:医疗生态系统中利益相关者的定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 3;27:e58264. doi: 10.2196/58264.

引用本文的文献

1
Interoperability of telemonitoring data in digital health solutions: a scoping review.数字健康解决方案中远程监测数据的互操作性:一项范围综述。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Apr 22;7:1502260. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1502260. eCollection 2025.