Suppr超能文献

荷兰一家商业及社区检测机构的HIV自我采样与自我检测:用户偏好及可用性

Self-sampling and self-testing for HIV at a commercial and community-based test provider in the Netherlands: user preferences and usability.

作者信息

Willemstein I J M, Shobowale O, Żakowicz A M, Bos H, Op de Coul E L M

机构信息

Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, P.O. Box 1, Bilthoven, 3720 BA, The Netherlands.

AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF) Europe, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 25;25(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12252-4.

Abstract

HIV self-sampling and -testing (HIVSS/ST) reduces testing barriers and potentially reaches populations who may not test otherwise. In the Netherlands, at-home HIV tests became commercially available around 2016, but data on user experiences are limited. This study aimed to explore characteristics of users and their experiences with HIVSS/ST. In 2022 and 2023, a survey was distributed among users of one online commercial provider and one community-based provider; either users ordered a commercial online HIVSS/ST or they sought a free-of-charge HIVST via the community-based provider. Questions included usability, preferences, and barriers of HIVSS/ST-testing. We compared characteristics and experiences of users between providers, risk groups and first-time and repeat testers. In total, 133 users completed the survey; 89 (67%) via the commercial provider and 44 (33%) via the community-based provider. Response rates per provider were 2% and 26%, respectively. Users who bought their test at the commercial provider were more often Gay and Bisexual Men (GBM) (42%), 35 + years (43%), and born in the Netherlands (89%), compared to those recruited through the community-provider (respectively 27%, 25%, 14%). GBM were more often repeat and recent HIVSS/ST-testers, and using pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Women and heterosexual men were more likely to buy an HIVSS/ST as part of a combination Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) test package. Overall, main reasons for choosing HIVSS/ST were saving time (42%), anonymity (36%) and not having to talk to a GP (35%). Twenty-two percent of the study participants experienced some problems performing the HIVSS/ST, the most reported problem was obtaining sufficient blood through the finger prick (71%). Recommendations to improve accessibility of HIVSS/ST included more awareness (advertising by trustful providers), more access locations (pharmacies/supermarkets/schools) and lower costs. Our findings indicate that HIVSS/ST is a valuable additional HIV testing method for users, but more insight into the contribution of HIVSS/ST to HIV prevention policies is needed.

摘要

艾滋病毒自我采样和检测(HIVSS/ST)降低了检测障碍,并有可能覆盖那些否则可能不会接受检测的人群。在荷兰,家用艾滋病毒检测大约在2016年开始商业化,但关于用户体验的数据有限。本研究旨在探索用户的特征及其HIVSS/ST体验。在2022年和2023年,对一家在线商业供应商和一家社区供应商的用户进行了一项调查;用户要么订购了商业在线HIVSS/ST,要么通过社区供应商寻求免费的HIVST。问题包括HIVSS/ST检测的可用性、偏好和障碍。我们比较了不同供应商、风险群体以及首次和重复检测者之间用户的特征和体验。共有133名用户完成了调查;89名(67%)通过商业供应商,44名(33%)通过社区供应商。每个供应商的回复率分别为2%和26%。与通过社区供应商招募的用户相比(分别为27%、25%、14%),在商业供应商处购买检测的用户中男同性恋者和双性恋男性(GBM)比例更高(42%),年龄在35岁及以上的比例更高(43%),在荷兰出生的比例更高(89%)。GBM更常是重复和近期的HIVSS/ST检测者,并且正在使用暴露前预防(PrEP)。女性和异性恋男性更有可能将购买HIVSS/ST作为性传播感染(STI)联合检测套餐的一部分。总体而言,选择HIVSS/ST的主要原因是节省时间(42%)、匿名性(36%)以及无需与全科医生交谈(35%)。22%的研究参与者在进行HIVSS/ST时遇到了一些问题,最常报告的问题是通过手指采血获取足够的血液(71%)。提高HIVSS/ST可及性的建议包括提高认知度(由可信赖的供应商进行宣传)、增加获取地点(药店/超市/学校)以及降低成本。我们的研究结果表明,HIVSS/ST对用户来说是一种有价值的额外艾滋病毒检测方法,但需要对HIVSS/ST对艾滋病毒预防政策的贡献有更多了解。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验