Brown Sandra A, Garavan Hugh, Jernigan Terry L, Tapert Susan F, Huber Rebekah S, Lopez Daniel, Murray Traci, Dowling Gayathri, Hoffman Elizabeth A, Uddin Lucina Q
Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
Eur J Neurosci. 2025 Jan;61(2):e16662. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16662.
This editorial focuses on the issue of data misuse that is increasingly evidenced in social media as well as some premiere scientific journals. This issue is of critical importance to open science projects in general, and ABCD in particular, given the broad array of biological, behavioural and environmental information collected on this American sample of 12,000 youth and parents. ABCD data are already widely used with over 1,200 publications and twice as many citations per year as expected (relative citation index based on year, field and journal). However, the adverse consequences of misuse of data and inaccurate interpretation of emergent findings from this precedent setting study may have a profound impact on disadvantaged populations and perpetuate biases and societal injustices.
这篇社论关注的数据滥用问题在社交媒体以及一些顶级科学期刊中日益凸显。鉴于在这个包含12000名美国青年及其父母的样本中收集了广泛的生物、行为和环境信息,这个问题对于一般的开放科学项目,尤其是ABCD项目至关重要。ABCD数据已经被广泛使用,有超过1200篇出版物,并且每年的引用次数是预期的两倍(基于年份、领域和期刊的相对引用指数)。然而,数据滥用以及对这项开创性研究中出现的结果的错误解读所带来的不良后果,可能会对弱势群体产生深远影响,并使偏见和社会不公长期存在。