Patel Vraj, Rismani Mina, Sultan Fakhra, Essa Amr, Schafer Pascha
School of Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA.
Department of Medicine, Wellstar Medical College of Georgia Health, Augusta, GA, USA.
AME Case Rep. 2024 Nov 18;9:22. doi: 10.21037/acr-24-93. eCollection 2025.
In cases of electrical storm, identifying the etiology is essential, as patients with reversible causes do not benefit from implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Given the diversity of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management tools available for hemodynamically unstable patients in electrical storm, all must be considered and tailored to each individual patient.
This report describes a 36-year-old female without prior cardiac history who presented in ventricular fibrillation (VF) electrical storm. While she lacked significant electrolyte abnormalities or ischemia to explain etiology of electrical storm, she incidentally had variant coronary anatomy noted on angiography. After thorough consideration of possible etiologies of storm, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) intoxication was the most highly suspected etiology. Regarding management of her hemodynamically unstable electrical storm, she was treated with lidocaine, amiodarone, as well as mechanical circulatory support devices including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP). The patient ultimately was decannulated from ECMO, had IABP removal, and achieved recovery of ejection fraction (EF) to baseline. She was not offered ICD as the etiology of her cardiac arrest was reversable. She was discharged with recommendation to discontinue SSRI and follow up with psychiatry regarding SSRI overdose.
Identification of electrical storm etiology is crucial as reversible causes do not warrant ICD placement. Selection of appropriate pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management in the hemodynamically unstable electrical storm patient is important given the wide range of available options.
在电风暴的病例中,确定病因至关重要,因为病因可逆的患者无法从植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)中获益。鉴于对于血流动力学不稳定的电风暴患者有多种药物和非药物管理工具可供选择,必须对所有这些工具进行综合考虑并根据每个患者的具体情况进行调整。
本报告描述了一名36岁、既往无心脏病史的女性,其出现心室颤动(VF)电风暴。虽然她没有明显的电解质异常或缺血来解释电风暴的病因,但在血管造影时偶然发现其冠状动脉解剖结构变异。在对电风暴的可能病因进行全面考虑后,选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)中毒是最可疑的病因。对于她血流动力学不稳定的电风暴的管理,给予她利多卡因、胺碘酮治疗,以及包括体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)和主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)在内的机械循环支持设备。患者最终拔除了ECMO插管,移除了IABP,并使射血分数(EF)恢复到基线水平。由于其心脏骤停的病因是可逆的,因此未为她植入ICD。她出院时被建议停用SSRI,并就SSRI过量问题接受精神科随访。
确定电风暴的病因至关重要,因为病因可逆的情况无需植入ICD。鉴于有多种可用的选择,为血流动力学不稳定的电风暴患者选择合适的药物和非药物管理方法很重要。