• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用柯克帕特里克评估模型为药剂师开展癌症疼痛管理培训。

Implementing Cancer Pain Management Training for Pharmacists Using the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model.

作者信息

Liu Yu, Peng Yang, Zhu Bimin, Xia Zhihua, Yuan Yonghua, Zhang Fujun

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, People's Republic of China.

Department of Pharmacy, Dianjiang County People's Hospital, Chongqing, 408300, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2025 Jan 21;18:305-314. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S493936. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/JPR.S493936
PMID:39867535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11762252/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To develop a training program on cancer pain management for pharmacists and to evaluate the effectiveness of the training.

METHODS

The program developed a well-structured curriculum and subsequent evaluation of training effectiveness, guided by the Kirkpatrick four-tier evaluation model, including reaction, learning, behavior, and results. The training approach incorporated mentoring, study groups, and problem-based learning to create an immersive and impactful learning experience.

RESULTS

Fifty-three pharmacists participated in the survey. The reaction evaluation results showed that the cumulative percentage of "satisfied" and "very satisfied" with each of the nine statements exceeded 85%. The findings from the learning level assessment revealed that the cumulative percentage of accurate responses to the 13 items on the Cancer Pain Management Questionnaire was 57.7% before training. This percentage rose to 64.2% following the training, showcasing a statistically significant improvement (p=0.014). The behavioral scoring results showed that 53 trainees scored an average of more than 15 points on all four behavioral benchmarks. The pass rate for the trainees was 86.8%. The percentages of trainees who scored proficient, good, and excellent were 18.9% (10/53), 50.9% (27/53), and 17.0% (9/53), respectively. The evaluation of the results showed that all the respondents were engaged in cancer pain management practices. Of these participants, 85.7% (42/49) were members of a multidisciplinary cancer pain management team, and 53.1% (26/49) performed a cancer pain consultation or attended an outpatient clinic.

CONCLUSION

Study results suggested that the training program was effective in all dimensions defined by the Kirkpatrick model. This collective achievement indicates a substantial enhancement in the comprehension and proficiency of pharmacists regarding cancer pain management.

摘要

目的

为药剂师制定癌症疼痛管理培训计划并评估培训效果。

方法

该计划制定了结构完善的课程,并根据柯克帕特里克四级评估模型对培训效果进行后续评估,包括反应、学习、行为和结果。培训方法包括指导、学习小组和基于问题的学习,以创造沉浸式且有影响力的学习体验。

结果

53名药剂师参与了调查。反应评估结果显示,对九条陈述中每条的“满意”和“非常满意”累计百分比均超过85%。学习水平评估结果表明,癌症疼痛管理问卷上13项内容的准确回答累计百分比在培训前为57.7%。培训后该百分比升至64.2%,显示出统计学上的显著改善(p = 0.014)。行为评分结果显示,53名学员在所有四个行为基准上的平均得分均超过15分。学员的通过率为86.8%。得分熟练、良好和优秀的学员百分比分别为18.9%(10/53)、50.9%(27/53)和17.0%(9/53)。结果评估显示,所有受访者都参与了癌症疼痛管理实践。在这些参与者中,85.7%(42/49)是多学科癌症疼痛管理团队的成员,53.1%(26/49)进行了癌症疼痛咨询或参加了门诊。

结论

研究结果表明,该培训计划在柯克帕特里克模型定义的所有维度上均有效。这一总体成果表明药剂师在癌症疼痛管理方面的理解和能力有了显著提高。

相似文献

1
Implementing Cancer Pain Management Training for Pharmacists Using the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model.使用柯克帕特里克评估模型为药剂师开展癌症疼痛管理培训。
J Pain Res. 2025 Jan 21;18:305-314. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S493936. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluation of the Care Pathway in the Context of the Dispensing of Emicizumab (Hemlibra) in Community Pharmacies in France: Protocol for a Cross-sectional Study Based on the Kirkpatrick Model.法国社区药房中艾美赛珠单抗(Hemlibra)配药背景下护理路径的评估:基于柯克帕特里克模型的横断面研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Mar 8;12:e43091. doi: 10.2196/43091.
3
Assessment of a training project of English as a media of instruction(EMI) using Kirkpatrick model.运用柯克帕特里克模型评估以英语为教学媒介(EMI)的培训项目。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Apr 20;23(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04204-5.
4
Development and effectiveness of a BOPPPS teaching model-based workshop for community pharmacists training.基于 BOPPPS 教学模型的工作坊在社区药师培训中的开发与效果评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 15;24(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05282-9.
5
Evaluation of a continuing professional development training program for physicians and physician assistants in hospitals in Laos based on the Kirkpatrick model.基于柯克帕特里克模型对老挝医院医生和医师助理继续职业发展培训项目的评估。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016 May 31;13:21. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.21. eCollection 2016.
6
The Effect of "Online-Simulation-Bedside" Three-Step Teaching Method in Team Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills Training of Emergency Department and Critical Care Nursing Interns-An Analysis Based on Kirkpatrick Model.“线上模拟-床边”三步教学法在急诊科及重症监护护理实习生团队心肺复苏技能培训中的效果——基于柯克帕特里克模型的分析
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Feb 24;2025:8624274. doi: 10.1155/jonm/8624274. eCollection 2025.
7
Implementation of a novel population panel management curriculum among interprofessional health care trainees.实施新型的跨专业医疗保健学员人群小组管理课程。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Dec 22;17(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1093-y.
8
Development and evaluation of an online training program based on the O-AMAS teaching model for community pharmacists in the post-COVID-19 era.基于 O-AMAS 教学模式的面向新冠疫情后时代社区药师的在线培训项目的开发与评估。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 23;10:906504. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.906504. eCollection 2022.
9
Evaluation of a pharmacist-led, medicines education program for Aboriginal Health Workers.对一项由药剂师主导的针对原住民健康工作者的药物教育项目的评估。
Rural Remote Health. 2008 Oct-Dec;8(4):946. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
10
Evaluating a dental sleep apnea mini-residency program using the Kirkpatrick model.采用柯克帕特里克模式评估口腔睡眠呼吸暂停小型住院医师培训项目。
J Dent Educ. 2023 Jul;87(7):974-986. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13212. Epub 2023 Apr 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the Care Pathway in the Context of the Dispensing of Emicizumab (Hemlibra) in Community Pharmacies in France: Protocol for a Cross-sectional Study Based on the Kirkpatrick Model.法国社区药房中艾美赛珠单抗(Hemlibra)配药背景下护理路径的评估:基于柯克帕特里克模型的横断面研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Mar 8;12:e43091. doi: 10.2196/43091.
2
Harnessing power of simulation training effectiveness with Kirkpatrick model in emergency surgical airway procedures.运用柯克帕特里克模型提升急诊外科气道手术模拟训练效果
Heliyon. 2022 Oct 6;8(10):e10886. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10886. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Evaluating Pain Management Practices for Cancer Patients among Health Professionals: A Global Survey.评估卫生专业人员对癌症患者的疼痛管理实践:全球调查。
J Palliat Med. 2022 Aug;25(8):1243-1248. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0596. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
4
Practice, Knowledge, and Attitude of Health Care Providers regarding Cancer Pain Management: A National Survey.医护人员在癌症疼痛管理方面的实践、知识和态度:一项全国性调查。
Pain Res Manag. 2021 Aug 23;2021:1247202. doi: 10.1155/2021/1247202. eCollection 2021.
5
Meaning-Centered Pain Coping Skills Training: A Pilot Feasibility Trial of a Psychosocial Pain Management Intervention for Patients with Advanced Cancer.意义中心疼痛应对技能训练:晚期癌症患者心理社会疼痛管理干预的初步可行性试验。
J Palliat Med. 2022 Jan;25(1):60-69. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0081. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
6
Practices and Hindrances in Cancer Pain Management: Results of a National Multi-Cancer Center Survey Among Healthcare Professionals in China.癌症疼痛管理中的实践与障碍:中国多癌症中心针对医疗专业人员的全国性调查结果
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Feb 18;13:1709-1717. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S290470. eCollection 2021.
7
Breakthrough cancer pain treatment in Spain: physicians' perception of current opioids utilization and prescription.西班牙突破性癌症疼痛治疗:医生对当前阿片类药物使用和处方的看法。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Aug;36(8):1383-1391. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1775073. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
8
Effect of role-playing on learning outcome of nursing students based on the Kirkpatrick evaluation model.基于柯克帕特里克评估模型探讨角色扮演对护生学习效果的影响。
J Educ Health Promot. 2019 Oct 24;8:197. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_138_19. eCollection 2019.
9
Evaluation of pharmacist interventions as part of a multidisciplinary cancer pain management team in a Chinese academic medical center.评价药师干预作为中国学术医学中心多学科癌症疼痛管理团队的一部分。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020 Jan-Feb;60(1):76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
10
Long-term sustainability of a quality improvement program on cancer pain management: a complex intervention in an inpatient setting.癌症疼痛管理质量改进项目的长期可持续性:住院环境中的一项复杂干预措施。
Tumori. 2020 Feb;106(1):25-32. doi: 10.1177/0300891619869513. Epub 2019 Aug 28.