• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

围绕患者“不明智”治疗偏好和次优决策质量的伦理困境:三例肾细胞癌患者在选择不符合指南的治疗后出现局部复发的病例系列

Ethical dilemmas surrounding patients´ "unwise" treatment preferences and suboptimal decision quality: case series of three renal cell carcinoma patients who developed local recurrences after non-guideline-concordant care choices.

作者信息

Rumaihi Khalid Al, Younes Nagy, Khalil Ibrahim Adnan, Badawi Alaeddin, Barah Ali, Ansari Walid El

机构信息

Department of Urology, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

College of Medicine, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

Pan Afr Med J. 2024 Oct 18;49:45. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2024.49.45.42047. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.11604/pamj.2024.49.45.42047
PMID:39867546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11760209/
Abstract

Patient engagement and shared decision-making (SDM) between patients and clinicians is the foundation of patient-centered care. It aims to reach a treatment option that fits the patient's preference and is guideline-concordant. We sought to evaluate the possible causes and outcomes of patient's non-guideline-concordant care choices. Using a retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients who underwent cryoablation for small renal masses between January 2010 and January 2023. Inclusion criteria were patients with renal tumor(s) who underwent cryoablation which was not recommended by the multidisciplinary team (MDT). We present three patients with unilateral clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Based on imaging and other findings, the oncology MDT recommended partial/radical nephrectomy. Upon consultation, each refused surgery and preferred cryoablation. Respecting their choice, cryoablation was undertaken. The patients had treatment failure and developed recurrences that could have possibly been avoided with guideline-concordant care. Shared decision-making in healthcare involves several aspects: patient/family; uncertainty of available evidence of various treatments; MDT meetings; and treatment team. For patients to select 'wise' treatment preferences i.e. guideline-concordant care, multi-layered complex intellectual and cognitive processes are required, where experience may play a role. Healthcare professionals require guidance and training on appropriate SDM in clinical settings, and awareness of tools to solicit patient choice to guideline-concordant care whilst observing patient autonomy. Patients and treatment teams need the capacity, knowledge, and skills to reach a 'wise' guideline-concordant care treatment preference jointly. Patients' unwise preference could lead to suboptimal outcomes, in the case of our patients, tumor recurrence.

摘要

患者与临床医生之间的参与度及共同决策(SDM)是患者为中心的医疗的基础。其目的是达成一种符合患者偏好且与指南一致的治疗方案。我们试图评估患者不符合指南的治疗选择的可能原因及结果。通过对2010年1月至2023年1月间接受小肾肿瘤冷冻消融治疗的患者病历进行回顾性分析。纳入标准为患有肾肿瘤且接受了多学科团队(MDT)不推荐的冷冻消融治疗的患者。我们呈现了3例单侧透明细胞肾细胞癌患者。基于影像学及其他检查结果,肿瘤MDT建议行部分/根治性肾切除术。经咨询,每位患者均拒绝手术而倾向于冷冻消融。尊重他们的选择,实施了冷冻消融。这些患者出现了治疗失败并发生了复发,而符合指南的治疗可能避免这种情况。医疗保健中的共同决策涉及几个方面:患者/家属;各种治疗现有证据的不确定性;MDT会议;以及治疗团队。为了让患者选择“明智”的治疗偏好,即符合指南的治疗,需要多层次的复杂智力和认知过程,经验可能在其中发挥作用。医疗保健专业人员在临床环境中需要接受关于适当共同决策的指导和培训,并了解在尊重患者自主权的同时征求患者对符合指南治疗选择的工具。患者和治疗团队需要具备共同达成“明智”的符合指南治疗偏好的能力、知识和技能。患者不明智的偏好可能导致次优结果,就我们的患者而言,即肿瘤复发。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0943/11760209/73a9b794d523/PAMJ-49-45-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0943/11760209/c05f489bd445/PAMJ-49-45-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0943/11760209/73a9b794d523/PAMJ-49-45-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0943/11760209/c05f489bd445/PAMJ-49-45-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0943/11760209/73a9b794d523/PAMJ-49-45-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Ethical dilemmas surrounding patients´ "unwise" treatment preferences and suboptimal decision quality: case series of three renal cell carcinoma patients who developed local recurrences after non-guideline-concordant care choices.围绕患者“不明智”治疗偏好和次优决策质量的伦理困境:三例肾细胞癌患者在选择不符合指南的治疗后出现局部复发的病例系列
Pan Afr Med J. 2024 Oct 18;49:45. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2024.49.45.42047. eCollection 2024.
2
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
4
Cryoablation vs radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of case series studies.冷冻消融与射频消融治疗肾细胞癌的比较:病例系列研究的荟萃分析。
BJU Int. 2012 Aug;110(4):510-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10885.x. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
5
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
6
Examining How Technology Supports Shared Decision-Making in Oncology Consultations: Qualitative Thematic Analysis.审视技术如何支持肿瘤学会诊中的共同决策:定性主题分析
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jun 11;11:e70827. doi: 10.2196/70827.
7
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations.为医疗服务提供者提供的干预措施,以促进临床会诊中以患者为中心的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD003267. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003267.pub2.
9
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员采用共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub2.
10
Is Frequent Imaging Necessary? Impact of Computed Tomography During Follow-up After Surgical Treatment for Nonmetastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.频繁成像是否必要?非转移性肾细胞癌手术治疗后随访期间计算机断层扫描的影响:一项系统评价。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2025 Jun;8(3):829-840. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.11.014. Epub 2024 Dec 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Multidisciplinary Surgical Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma With Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombus: Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes.伴有下腔静脉瘤栓的肾细胞癌的多学科手术治疗:围手术期及肿瘤学结局
Cureus. 2025 Jun 7;17(6):e85527. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85527. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Health Consumer Engagement, Enablement, and Empowerment in Smartphone-Enabled Home-Based Diagnostic Testing for Viral Infections: Mixed Methods Study.智能手机支持的家庭诊断检测中病毒感染的健康消费者参与、使能和赋权:混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jun 30;10(6):e34685. doi: 10.2196/34685.
2
Factors that influence older patients' participation in clinical communication within developed country hospitals and GP clinics: A systematic review of current literature.影响发达国家医院和全科医生诊所中老年患者参与临床沟通的因素:当前文献的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 27;17(6):e0269840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269840. eCollection 2022.
3
Moving From 'Best Interests' to 'Will and Preference': A Study of Doctors' Level of Knowledge Relating to the Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act 2015.
从“最佳利益”到“意愿和偏好”:一项关于医生对 2015 年辅助决策(能力)法案知识水平的研究。
Ir Med J. 2022 Apr 29;115(4):585.
4
Abandon Informed Consent in Favor of Probability-Based, Shared Decision-Making Following the Wishes of a Reasonable Person.放弃知情同意,转而支持基于概率的、遵循理性人意愿的共同决策。
J Patient Exp. 2022 Jun 7;9:23743735221106599. doi: 10.1177/23743735221106599. eCollection 2022.
5
Integrating the Patient's Voice in Toxicity Reporting and Treatment Decisions for Breast Radiotherapy.将患者声音纳入乳腺癌放射治疗的毒性报告和治疗决策中。
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2022 Jul;32(3):207-220. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.01.010.
6
Do Patients Want to Be Involved in Their Carpal Tunnel Surgery Decisions? A Multicenter Study.患者是否希望参与腕管综合征手术决策?一项多中心研究。
J Hand Surg Am. 2023 Nov;48(11):1162.e1-1162.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.03.025. Epub 2022 Jun 4.
7
Patient and clinician perspectives of pelvic floor dysfunction after gynaecological cancer.妇科癌症后盆底功能障碍的患者及临床医生观点
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2022 May 24;41:101007. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101007. eCollection 2022 Jun.
8
Preparing for colorectal surgery: a qualitative study of experiences and preferences of patients in Western Canada.准备结直肠手术:加拿大西部患者的经验和偏好的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 1;22(1):730. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08130-y.
9
Reforms to mental health laws will prioritise care and patient choice.
BMJ. 2022 May 12;377:o1194. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o1194.
10
Michigan Plan for Appropriate Tailored Healthcare in Pregnancy Prenatal Care Recommendations: A Practical Guide for Maternity Care Clinicians.密歇根州孕期适宜医疗保健计划产前护理建议:孕产妇保健临床医生实用指南。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Jul;31(7):917-925. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0589. Epub 2022 May 12.