• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响发达国家医院和全科医生诊所中老年患者参与临床沟通的因素:当前文献的系统评价。

Factors that influence older patients' participation in clinical communication within developed country hospitals and GP clinics: A systematic review of current literature.

机构信息

College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.

Faculty of Health, Southern Cross University, Gold Coast, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jun 27;17(6):e0269840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269840. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0269840
PMID:35759474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9236261/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Engaging older adults in clinical communication is an essential aspect of high-quality elder care, patient safety and satisfaction in hospitals and GP clinics. However, the factors that influence older adults' participation during their appointments with health professionals from the older patient's perspective remain under-investigated.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to fill this knowledge gap by reviewing research articles that have examined older patients' involvement in clinical communication. In doing so, we hope to assist healthcare professionals and institutions in developing new strategies to improve older patients' participation and engagement in clinical communication.

METHODS

A systematic review of nine databases was conducted for studies reporting identified influences on older patients' participation in clinical communication published from 2010. These studies were then subjected to thematic analysis for stratification.

RESULTS

Twenty-one articles with a total of 36,797 participants were included and highlighted three major themes that influenced older patients' participation in the clinical communication. The first theme identified includes accessibility to appointments, support, health information and person-centred care, highlighting that access to appointments, person centred care and health information significantly influences clinical communication participation. Relevant and understandable healthcare information identified that communication factors [i.e. tailored health information, health literacy and patient language barriers, and communication impairments] influences older patients' participation. Older Patient perceptions of HCP credibility and trustworthiness highlighted how patient's perceptions of health professionals influence their willingness to participate in clinical communications.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

This review demonstrates that there are several factors that contribute to insufficient or no participation of older patients in clinical communication in hospitals and GP clinics. These include accessibility to relevant and understandable health information, and the perceived health professional credibility and trustworthiness. Identifying ways to address these factors may improve patient participation, doctor-patient collaboration and overall health outcomes for older patients.

摘要

背景

让老年人参与临床沟通是高质量老年护理、医院和全科诊所患者安全和满意度的重要方面。然而,从老年患者的角度来看,影响老年人在与卫生专业人员预约期间参与的因素仍未得到充分研究。

目的

我们旨在通过审查研究文章来填补这一知识空白,这些文章研究了老年患者在临床沟通中的参与情况。通过这样做,我们希望帮助医疗保健专业人员和机构制定新的策略,以改善老年患者在临床沟通中的参与度和参与度。

方法

对从 2010 年起发表的报告影响老年患者参与临床沟通的已确定因素的研究文章进行了九项数据库的系统审查。然后对这些研究进行了主题分析分层。

结果

共纳入 21 篇文章,总计 36797 名参与者,其中有三个主要主题影响了老年患者参与临床沟通。第一个主题包括预约的可及性、支持、健康信息和以患者为中心的护理,强调预约的可及性、以患者为中心的护理和健康信息对临床沟通参与有重大影响。相关和可理解的医疗保健信息确定了沟通因素[即量身定制的健康信息、健康素养和患者语言障碍以及沟通障碍]会影响老年患者的参与。老年患者对卫生保健专业人员可信度和可信赖性的看法强调了患者对卫生专业人员的看法如何影响他们参与临床沟通的意愿。

结论和意义

本综述表明,有几个因素导致医院和全科诊所的老年患者在临床沟通中参与不足或不参与。这些因素包括获得相关和可理解的健康信息,以及感知到的卫生专业人员的可信度和可信赖性。确定解决这些因素的方法可能会提高患者的参与度、医患合作以及老年患者的整体健康结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c51b/9236261/53f551be2dd6/pone.0269840.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c51b/9236261/fcb8111c1cb9/pone.0269840.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c51b/9236261/53f551be2dd6/pone.0269840.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c51b/9236261/fcb8111c1cb9/pone.0269840.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c51b/9236261/53f551be2dd6/pone.0269840.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors that influence older patients' participation in clinical communication within developed country hospitals and GP clinics: A systematic review of current literature.影响发达国家医院和全科医生诊所中老年患者参与临床沟通的因素:当前文献的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 27;17(6):e0269840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269840. eCollection 2022.
2
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
3
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
4
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
5
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Interventions to increase patient and family involvement in escalation of care for acute life-threatening illness in community health and hospital settings.增加患者和家属参与社区卫生和医院环境中急性危及生命疾病治疗升级的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 8;12(12):CD012829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012829.pub2.
8
Nursing and allied health professionals' views about using health literacy screening tools and a universal precautions approach to communication with older adults: a qualitative study.护理和相关健康专业人员对使用健康素养筛查工具和通用预防措施方法与老年人进行沟通的看法:一项定性研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Jun;42(13):1819-1825. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1538392. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
9
The practice environment's influence on patient participation in intermediate healthcare services - the perspectives of patients, relatives and healthcare professionals.实践环境对患者参与中级医疗服务的影响——患者、亲属及医疗专业人员的观点
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 25;21(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06175-z.
10
Factors influencing multiple non-utilised healthcare appointments from patients' and healthcare providers' perspectives: a qualitative systematic review of the global literature.从患者和医疗服务提供者角度探讨影响多次未使用医疗预约的因素:全球文献的定性系统综述
BJGP Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(4). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0075. Print 2024 Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Supporting Communication Access of People With Communication Disabilities and Communication Differences in UNCRPD-Ratified Countries: An Integrative Review.支持已批准《联合国残疾人权利公约》国家中存在沟通障碍和沟通差异的人群的沟通渠道:一项综合综述。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Sep-Oct;60(5):e70098. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70098.
2
Qualitative evaluation by community health professionals of a technology design for recording and mobilizing patient reported care narratives.社区卫生专业人员对用于记录和调动患者报告的护理叙事的技术设计进行的定性评估。
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 25;11:20552076251350932. doi: 10.1177/20552076251350932. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The effectiveness of a person-centred communication skills training programme for the health care professionals of a large hospital in Denmark.丹麦一家大医院的医护人员进行以患者为中心的沟通技巧培训方案的效果。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jun;104(6):1423-1430. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.018. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
2
Patient and Family Involvement: A Discussion of Co-Led Redesign of Healthcare Services.患者及家属参与:关于共同主导的医疗服务重新设计的讨论
J Particip Med. 2018 Feb 1;10(1):e5. doi: 10.2196/jopm.8957.
3
Communication and shared decision-making with patients with limited health literacy; helpful strategies, barriers and suggestions for improvement reported by hospital-based palliative care providers.
Enhancing ward rounds for older patients with frailty: a modified Delphi process.
加强对老年体弱患者的查房:一种改良的德尔菲法。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Mar 27;25(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07005-0.
4
Global, regional, and national temporal trends in prevalence, deaths and disability-adjusted life years for chronic pulmonary disease, 1990-2021: an age-period-cohort analysis based on the global burden of disease study 2021.1990 - 2021年慢性肺病患病率、死亡人数及伤残调整生命年的全球、区域和国家时间趋势:基于2021年全球疾病负担研究的年龄 - 时期 - 队列分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 4;12:1554442. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1554442. eCollection 2025.
5
Barriers to health, social and long-term care access among older adults: a systematic review of reviews.老年人获得健康、社会和长期护理的障碍:一项综述的系统评价
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Mar 12;24(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02429-y.
6
Engaging older adults in diagnostic safety: implementing a diagnostic communication note sheet in a primary care setting.让老年人参与诊断安全:在初级保健环境中实施诊断沟通记录单
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jan 13;4:1474195. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1474195. eCollection 2024.
7
Ethical dilemmas surrounding patients´ "unwise" treatment preferences and suboptimal decision quality: case series of three renal cell carcinoma patients who developed local recurrences after non-guideline-concordant care choices.围绕患者“不明智”治疗偏好和次优决策质量的伦理困境:三例肾细胞癌患者在选择不符合指南的治疗后出现局部复发的病例系列
Pan Afr Med J. 2024 Oct 18;49:45. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2024.49.45.42047. eCollection 2024.
8
Virtual Care Appointments and Experience Among Older Rural Patients with Chronic Conditions in New South Wales: An Analysis of Existing Survey Data.新南威尔士州农村慢性病老年患者的虚拟护理预约及体验:对现有调查数据的分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 17;21(12):1678. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121678.
9
Virtual Healthcare for Older Adults With Preventable Chronic Conditions: A Meta-synthesis of Quality Aspects.针对患有可预防慢性病的老年人的虚拟医疗保健:质量方面的元综合分析
J Appl Gerontol. 2025 Jul;44(7):1089-1108. doi: 10.1177/07334648241296791. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
10
Evaluating cancer patients' experiences with doctor-patient communication in Taiwan: development and validation of a new assessment instrument.评估台湾地区癌症患者的医患沟通体验:新评估工具的开发与验证。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Nov 11;32(12):781. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08990-6.
与健康素养有限的患者进行沟通和共同决策;医院姑息治疗提供者报告的有用策略、障碍和改进建议。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 19;15(6):e0234926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234926. eCollection 2020.
4
Impact of Age on Patients' Communication and Technology Preferences in the Era of Meaningful Use: Mixed Methods Study.有意义使用时代年龄对患者沟通及技术偏好的影响:混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 1;22(6):e13470. doi: 10.2196/13470.
5
Incorporating shared decision making into communication with older adults with cancer and their caregivers: Development and evaluation of a geriatric shared decision-making communication skills training module.将共同决策纳入与老年癌症患者及其照护者的沟通中:老年共同决策沟通技能培训模块的开发和评估。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Nov;103(11):2328-2334. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.04.032. Epub 2020 May 5.
6
Socio-economic inequalities in the multiple dimensions of access to healthcare: the case of South Africa.社会经济不平等与医疗保健多维度获取之间的关系:以南非为例。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Mar 4;20(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8368-7.
7
Addressing the Needs of an Aging Population in the Health System: The Australian Case.满足卫生系统中老龄人口的需求:以澳大利亚为例。
Health Syst Reform. 2017 Jul 3;3(3):236-247. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2017.1358796.
8
Health professionals' understanding of person-centred communication for risk prevention conversations: an exploratory study.医疗专业人员对以患者为中心的风险预防沟通的理解:一项探索性研究。
Contemp Nurse. 2019 Dec;55(6):495-506. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2019.1664925. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
9
Older Patients' Views of Health Care Interactions in Ireland.爱尔兰老年患者对医疗保健互动的看法。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2018 Oct 15;2(4):e180-e191. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20180831-01. eCollection 2018 Oct.
10
Health-services utilisation amongst older persons during the last year of life: a population-based study.老年人在生命最后一年的卫生服务利用情况:一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Dec 20;18(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-1006-x.