• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替诺福韦艾拉酚胺治疗慢性乙型肝炎时肝细胞癌发病率较低:来自大规模队列研究的证据

Lower incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma with tenofovir alafenamide in chronic hepatitis B: Evidence from a large-scale cohort.

作者信息

Yoo Hye-Jin, Kim Jae-Young, Yoo Jeong-Ju, Lee Hye Won, Kim Sang Gyune, Kim Young Seok

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University School of Medicine, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea.

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheonsi Gyeonggido, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

JHEP Rep. 2024 Nov 12;7(2):101268. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101268. eCollection 2025 Feb.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101268
PMID:39867683
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11762169/
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) lacks extensive research regarding its impact on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study evaluated and compared the effects of TAF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and entecavir (ETV) on HCC incidence using nationwide claim data.

METHODS

In total, 75,816 patients with treatment-naïve HBV were included in the study and divided into TAF (n = 25,680), TDF (n = 26,954), and ETV (n = 23,182) groups after exclusions. Propensity score matching (1:1:1) resulted in 17,537 patients per group. HCC incidence rates were compared among the groups.

RESULTS

Before matching, the incidence of HCC was significantly lower in the TAF group compared with the TDF and ETV groups (11.47 15.04 and 14.24 per 1,000 person-years). The incidence rate ratio (IRR) for TDF was 1.31 (1.19-1.44) and for ETV was 1.24 (1.12-1.37). Before matching, the TAF group had a significantly lower HCC compared with TDF and ETV in both patients with and without cirrhosis. After matching, the TAF group had a lower HCC incidence compared with the TDF group (12.38 15.39, IRR 1.24, <0.001) but not with ETV group (IRR 1.08,  = 0.219). In patients with cirrhosis, TAF had lower HCC incidence compared with TDF and ETV (30.25 39.56 and 38.51, respectively). In patients without cirrhosis, the TAF group had a lower HCC incidence compared with the TDF group (IRR 1.19,  = 0.030) but not the ETV group (IRR 0.85,  = 0.066). Cox regression analysis showed that the TAF group had a significantly lower HCC incidence compared with the TDF (hazard ratio 1.335, <0.001) and ETV groups (hazard ratio 1.162,  = 0.011), after adjusting for age, gender, and cirrhosis status.

CONCLUSIONS

The TAF group consistently demonstrated a lower incidence of HCC compared with the TDF and ETV groups, especially in patients with cirrhosis.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

This work aimed to fill the knowledge gap regarding the comparative efficacy of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and entecavir (ETV) in reducing the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic HBV. The results are particularly crucial for healthcare providers and policymakers, because they highlight the significantly lower incidence of HCC associated with TAF, especially in patients with cirrhosis. These results suggest TAF as a preferable antiviral therapy option to mitigate HCC risk, thus influencing clinical decision-making and healthcare guidelines. From a practical perspective, these findings can guide physicians in prescribing more effective treatments, assist researchers in designing further studies to explore the mechanisms behind the effectiveness of TAF, and inform policymakers to craft healthcare policies that optimize patient outcomes while considering potential limitations, such as the observational nature of the study and residual confounding factors.

摘要

背景与目的

关于替诺福韦艾拉酚胺(TAF)对肝细胞癌(HCC)影响的研究尚不充分。本研究利用全国性医保报销数据评估并比较了TAF、富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯(TDF)和恩替卡韦(ETV)对HCC发病率的影响。

方法

本研究共纳入75816例初治慢性乙型肝炎患者,排除部分患者后分为TAF组(n = 25680)、TDF组(n = 26954)和ETV组(n = 23182)。采用倾向评分匹配法(1:1:1),每组最终纳入17537例患者。比较三组患者的HCC发病率。

结果

匹配前,TAF组的HCC发病率显著低于TDF组和ETV组(分别为每1000人年11.47例、15.04例和14.24例)。TDF组的发病率比值比(IRR)为1.31(1.19 - 1.44),ETV组为1.24(1.12 - 1.37)。匹配前,无论有无肝硬化,TAF组的HCC发病率均显著低于TDF组和ETV组。匹配后,TAF组的HCC发病率低于TDF组(分别为每1000人年12.38例、15.39例,IRR 1.24,P < 0.001),但与ETV组无差异(IRR 1.08,P = 0.219)。在肝硬化患者中,TAF组的HCC发病率低于TDF组和ETV组(分别为每1000人年30.25例、39.56例和38.51例)。在无肝硬化患者中,TAF组的HCC发病率低于TDF组(IRR 1.19,P = 0.030),但与ETV组无差异(IRR 0.85,P = 0.066)。Cox回归分析显示,在调整年龄、性别和肝硬化状态后,TAF组的HCC发病率显著低于TDF组(风险比1.335,P < 0.001)和ETV组(风险比1.162,P = 0.011)。

结论

与TDF组和ETV组相比,TAF组的HCC发病率始终较低,尤其是在肝硬化患者中。

影响与意义

本研究旨在填补关于替诺福韦艾拉酚胺(TAF)、富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯(TDF)和恩替卡韦(ETV)在降低慢性乙型肝炎患者肝细胞癌(HCC)发病率方面比较疗效的知识空白。研究结果对医疗服务提供者和政策制定者尤为重要,因为它们突出了TAF与显著较低的HCC发病率相关,尤其是在肝硬化患者中。这些结果表明TAF是降低HCC风险的更优抗病毒治疗选择,从而影响临床决策和医疗指南。从实际角度来看,这些发现可以指导医生开具更有效的治疗方案,协助研究人员设计进一步研究以探索TAF有效性背后的机制,并为政策制定者制定优化患者治疗效果的医疗政策提供参考,同时考虑到研究的观察性本质和残余混杂因素等潜在局限性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5464/11762169/b0f0e959606c/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5464/11762169/057fecc1b74c/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5464/11762169/ab2e806a214c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5464/11762169/ea636f05c778/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5464/11762169/b0f0e959606c/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5464/11762169/057fecc1b74c/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5464/11762169/ab2e806a214c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5464/11762169/ea636f05c778/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5464/11762169/b0f0e959606c/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Lower incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma with tenofovir alafenamide in chronic hepatitis B: Evidence from a large-scale cohort.替诺福韦艾拉酚胺治疗慢性乙型肝炎时肝细胞癌发病率较低:来自大规模队列研究的证据
JHEP Rep. 2024 Nov 12;7(2):101268. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101268. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Long-term efficacy and safety of tenofovir alafenamide, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and entecavir in treating hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure: A 144-week data analysis.替诺福韦艾拉酚胺、富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯和恩替卡韦治疗乙型肝炎病毒相关慢加急性肝衰竭的长期疗效和安全性:一项144周的数据分析。
Liver Res. 2024 Oct 24;8(4):295-303. doi: 10.1016/j.livres.2024.10.001. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Real-World Single-Center Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Entecavir, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate, and Tenofovir Alafenamide in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B.真实世界中单中心比较恩替卡韦、富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯和替诺福韦艾拉酚胺在慢性乙型肝炎患者中的安全性和疗效。
Intervirology. 2022;65(2):94-103. doi: 10.1159/000519440. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
4
Impact of tenofovir alafenamide vs. entecavir on hepatocellular carcinoma risk in patients with chronic hepatitis B.替诺福韦艾拉酚胺与恩替卡韦对慢性乙型肝炎患者肝细胞癌风险的影响。
Hepatol Int. 2021 Oct;15(5):1083-1092. doi: 10.1007/s12072-021-10234-2. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
5
Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in antiviral treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients treated with entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: a network meta-analysis.接受恩替卡韦或替诺福韦酯治疗的初治慢性乙型肝炎患者发生肝细胞癌的风险:一项网络荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Mar 17;22(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09413-7.
6
Effect of tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on hepatocellular carcinoma risk in chronic hepatitis B.替诺福韦艾拉酚胺与富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯对慢性乙型肝炎患者肝细胞癌风险的影响。
J Viral Hepat. 2021 Nov;28(11):1570-1578. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13601. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
7
Hepatocellular carcinoma risk in patients with chronic hepatitis B receiving tenofovir- vs. entecavir-based regimens: Individual patient data meta-analysis.接受替诺福韦与恩替卡韦治疗方案的慢性乙型肝炎患者的肝细胞癌风险:个体患者数据荟萃分析
J Hepatol. 2023 Mar;78(3):534-542. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.12.007. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
8
Cost-effectiveness of switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide versus entecavir for chronic hepatitis B patients in Greece.替诺福韦酯向替诺福韦艾拉酚胺转换与恩替卡韦相比用于希腊慢性乙型肝炎患者的成本效益分析。
J Comp Eff Res. 2024 Apr;13(4):e230090. doi: 10.57264/cer-2023-0090. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
9
Similar risk of hepatocellular carcinoma during long-term entecavir or tenofovir therapy in Caucasian patients with chronic hepatitis B.在慢性乙型肝炎的高加索患者中,长期接受恩替卡韦或替诺福韦治疗发生肝细胞癌的风险相似。
J Hepatol. 2020 Nov;73(5):1037-1045. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.06.011. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
10
Tenofovir alafenamide and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate reduce incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B.丙酚替诺福韦和替诺福韦酯可降低慢性乙型肝炎患者肝细胞癌的发生率。
JHEP Rep. 2023 Jul 13;5(10):100847. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100847. eCollection 2023 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Reply to: "Comment on "Lower incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma with tenofovir alafenamide in chronic hepatitis B: Evidence from a large-scale cohort"".回复:“对‘替诺福韦艾拉酚胺治疗慢性乙型肝炎时肝细胞癌发生率较低:来自大规模队列的证据’的评论”
JHEP Rep. 2025 Feb 26;7(5):101371. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2025.101371. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Comment on "Lower incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma with tenofovir alafenamide in chronic hepatitis B: Evidence from a large-scale cohort".关于“替诺福韦艾拉酚胺治疗慢性乙型肝炎时肝细胞癌发生率较低:来自大规模队列的证据”的评论
JHEP Rep. 2025 Jan 23;7(5):101334. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2025.101334. eCollection 2025 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Changing etiology and epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma: Asia and worldwide.肝细胞癌病因及流行病学的变化:亚洲及全球情况
J Liver Cancer. 2024 Mar;24(1):62-70. doi: 10.17998/jlc.2024.03.13. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
2
The Epidemiology of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Korea: 15-Year Analysis.韩国乙型肝炎病毒感染的流行病学:15 年分析。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Jan 29;39(4):e22. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e22.
3
Tenofovir alafenamide and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate reduce incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B.
丙酚替诺福韦和替诺福韦酯可降低慢性乙型肝炎患者肝细胞癌的发生率。
JHEP Rep. 2023 Jul 13;5(10):100847. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100847. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma.《2022年韩国肝脏癌协会-韩国国立癌症中心肝细胞癌管理实践指南》
J Liver Cancer. 2023 Mar;23(1):1-120. doi: 10.17998/jlc.2022.11.07. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
5
Hepatocellular carcinoma risk in patients with chronic hepatitis B receiving tenofovir- vs. entecavir-based regimens: Individual patient data meta-analysis.接受替诺福韦与恩替卡韦治疗方案的慢性乙型肝炎患者的肝细胞癌风险:个体患者数据荟萃分析
J Hepatol. 2023 Mar;78(3):534-542. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.12.007. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
6
Global burden of primary liver cancer in 2020 and predictions to 2040.2020 年全球原发性肝癌负担及 2040 年预测。
J Hepatol. 2022 Dec;77(6):1598-1606. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.08.021. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
7
Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Tenofovir vs Entecavir Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis B Virus: A Reconstructed Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.替诺福韦与恩替卡韦治疗慢性乙型肝炎病毒的肝细胞癌风险:一项重建的个体患者数据荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2219407. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.19407.
8
The Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Entecavir Versus Tenofovir Treated US Cohort With Chronic Hepatitis B Virus.恩替卡韦与替诺福韦治疗美国慢性乙型肝炎病毒感染队列的肝细胞癌风险。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Apr;21(4):1111-1113.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.02.056. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
9
Review article: switching patients with chronic hepatitis B to tenofovir alafenamide-a review of current data.综述文章:慢性乙型肝炎患者换用替诺福韦艾拉酚胺的相关探讨——对现有数据的回顾。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Apr;55(8):921-943. doi: 10.1111/apt.16788. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
10
Efficacy of entecavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and tenofovir alafenamide in treatment-naive hepatitis B patients.恩替卡韦、富马酸替诺福韦二吡呋酯和替诺福韦艾拉酚胺在初治乙型肝炎患者中的疗效。
Hepatol Int. 2021 Dec;15(6):1328-1336. doi: 10.1007/s12072-021-10262-y. Epub 2021 Nov 20.