Suppr超能文献

选定的CYP2D6等位基因对曲马多代谢的代谢能力和抑制谱的体外比较分析。

In vitro comparative analysis of metabolic capabilities and inhibitory profiles of selected CYP2D6 alleles on tramadol metabolism.

作者信息

Nahid Noor Ahmed, Kanumuri Siva Rama Raju, Sharma Abhisheak, Wang Danxin, Johnson Julie A

机构信息

Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research and Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Feb;18(2):e70059. doi: 10.1111/cts.70059.

Abstract

Tramadol, the 41st most prescribed drug in the United States in 2021 is a prodrug activated by CYP2D6, which is highly polymorphic. Previous studies showed enzyme-inhibitor affinity varied between different CYP2D6 allelic variants with dextromethorphan and atomoxetine metabolism. However, no study has compared tramadol metabolism in different CYP2D6 alleles with different CYP2D6 inhibitors. We hypothesize that the inhibitory effects of CYP2D6 inhibitors on CYP2D6-mediated tramadol metabolism are inhibitor- and CYP2D6-allele-specific. We performed comparative analyses of CYP2D61, CYP2D62, CYP2D610, and CYP2D617 using recombinant enzymes to metabolize tramadol to O-desmethyltramadol, measured via UPLC-MS/MS. The Michaelis constant (K) and maximum velocity (V) for each CYP2D6 allele, and IC values for different inhibitors were determined by nonlinear regression analysis. Intrinsic clearance was calculated as V/K. The intrinsic clearance of tramadol was almost double for CYP2D62 (180%) but was much lower for CYP2D610 and 17 (20% and 10%, respectively) compared to CYP2D61. The inhibitor potencies (defined by Ki) for the various inhibitors for the CYP2D61 allele were quinidine > terbinafine > paroxetine ≈ duloxetine >>bupropion. CYP2D62 showed the next greatest inhibition, with Ki ratios compared to CYP2D61 ranging from 0.96 to 3.87. For each inhibitor tested, CYP2D610 and CYP2D617 were more resistant to inhibition than CYP2D61 or CYP2D62, with most Ki ratios in the 3-9 range. Three common CYP2D6 allelic variants showed different metabolic capacities toward tramadol and genotype-dependent inhibition compared to CYP2D61. Further studies are warranted to understand the clinical consequences of inhibitor and CYP2D6 genotype-dependent drug-drug interactions on tramadol bioactivation.

摘要

曲马多是2021年在美国处方量排名第41位的药物,它是一种由CYP2D6激活的前体药物,而CYP2D6具有高度多态性。先前的研究表明,右美沙芬和托莫西汀代谢过程中,不同CYP2D6等位基因变体之间的酶抑制剂亲和力存在差异。然而,尚无研究比较不同CYP2D6等位基因与不同CYP2D6抑制剂对曲马多代谢的影响。我们推测,CYP2D6抑制剂对CYP2D6介导的曲马多代谢的抑制作用具有抑制剂和CYP2D6等位基因特异性。我们使用重组酶对CYP2D61、CYP2D62、CYP2D610和CYP2D617进行了比较分析,以将曲马多代谢为O-去甲基曲马多,并通过超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法(UPLC-MS/MS)进行测定。通过非线性回归分析确定每个CYP2D6等位基因的米氏常数(K)和最大速度(V),以及不同抑制剂的半数抑制浓度(IC)值。内在清除率计算为V/K。与CYP2D61相比,CYP2D62对曲马多的内在清除率几乎翻倍(180%),但CYP2D610和17的内在清除率则低得多(分别为20%和10%)。CYP2D61等位基因的各种抑制剂的抑制效力(由Ki定义)为奎尼丁>特比萘芬>帕罗西汀≈度洛西汀>>安非他酮。CYP2D62表现出次高的抑制作用,与CYP2D61相比,Ki比值在0.96至3.87之间。对于所测试的每种抑制剂,CYP2D610和CYP2D617比CYP2D61或CYP2D62对抑制更具抗性,大多数Ki比值在3至9范围内。与CYP2D61相比,三种常见的CYP2D6等位基因变体对曲马多表现出不同的代谢能力和基因型依赖性抑制。有必要进一步开展研究,以了解抑制剂和CYP2D6基因型依赖性药物相互作用对曲马多生物活化的临床影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08e9/11772017/f6a89cf1935c/CTS-18-e70059-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验