Goutelle Sylvain, Bahuaud Olivier, Genestet Charlotte, Millet Aurélien, Parant François, Dumitrescu Oana, Ader Florence
Hospices Civils de Lyon, GH Nord, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Service de Pharmacie, 103 Grande rue de la Croix-Rousse, 69004, Lyon, France.
UMR CNRS 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2025 Mar;64(3):387-396. doi: 10.1007/s40262-025-01479-3. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
Limited information is available on the pharmacokinetics of rifampicin (RIF) along with that of its active metabolite, 25-deacetylrifampicin (25-dRIF). This study aimed to analyse the pharmacokinetic data of RIF and 25-dRIF collected in adult patients treated for tuberculosis.
In adult patients receiving 10 mg/kg of RIF as part of a standard regimen for drug-susceptible pulmonary tuberculosis enrolled in the Opti-4TB study, plasma RIF and 25-dRIF concentrations were measured at various occasions. The RIF and 25-dRIF concentrations were modelled simultaneously by using a population approach. The area under the concentration-time curves of RIF and 25-dRIF were estimated on each occasion of therapeutic drug monitoring. Optimal RIF exposure, defined as an area under the concentration-time curve over 24 hours/minimum inhibitory concentration > 435, was assessed.
Concentration data (247 and 243 concentrations of RIF and 25-dRIF, respectively) were obtained in 35 patients with tuberculosis (10 women, 25 men). Mycobacterium tuberculosis minimum inhibitory concentration ranged from 0.06 to 0.5 mg/L (median = 0.25 mg/L). The final model was a two-compartment model including RIF metabolism into 25-dRIF and auto-induction. Exposure to 25-dRIF was low, with a mean area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h ratio of 25-dRIF/RIF of 14 ± 6%. The area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h of RIF and 25-dRIF rapidly decreased during therapy, with an auto-induction half-life of 1.6 days. Optimal RIF exposure was achieved in only six (19.3%) out of 31 patients upon first therapeutic drug monitoring.
Exposure to both RIF and 25-dRIF rapidly decreased during tuberculosis therapy. The contribution of 25-dRIF to overall drug exposure was low. Attainment of the target area under the concentration-time curve over 24 hours/minimum inhibitory concentration for RIF was poor, supporting an increased RIF dosage as an option to compensate for auto-induction.
关于利福平(RIF)及其活性代谢产物25-去乙酰利福平(25-dRIF)的药代动力学信息有限。本研究旨在分析在接受结核病治疗的成年患者中收集的RIF和25-dRIF的药代动力学数据。
在Opti-4TB研究中,作为药物敏感型肺结核标准治疗方案一部分接受10mg/kg RIF治疗的成年患者,在不同时间点测量血浆RIF和25-dRIF浓度。采用群体方法同时对RIF和25-dRIF浓度进行建模。在每次治疗药物监测时估计RIF和25-dRIF浓度-时间曲线下面积。评估最佳RIF暴露,定义为24小时浓度-时间曲线下面积/最低抑菌浓度>435。
在35例结核病患者(10名女性,25名男性)中获得了浓度数据(分别为247个和243个RIF和25-dRIF浓度)。结核分枝杆菌最低抑菌浓度范围为0.06至0.5mg/L(中位数=0.25mg/L)。最终模型为二室模型,包括RIF代谢为25-dRIF和自身诱导。25-dRIF的暴露量较低,24小时浓度-时间曲线下面积的平均比值为25-dRIF/RIF为14±6%。在治疗期间,RIF和25-dRIF的24小时浓度-时间曲线下面积迅速下降,自身诱导半衰期为1.6天。在首次治疗药物监测时,31例患者中只有6例(19.3%)达到了最佳RIF暴露。
在结核病治疗期间,RIF和25-dRIF的暴露量迅速下降。25-dRIF对总体药物暴露的贡献较低。RIF达到24小时浓度-时间曲线下面积/最低抑菌浓度目标值的情况较差,支持增加RIF剂量作为补偿自身诱导的一种选择。