Schwenck Gracielle C, Bergeron Sophie, Huberman Jackie S, Impett Emily A, Oliveira Heather, Rosen Natalie O
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Life Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, 1355 Oxford Street, P.O. Box 15,000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.
Département de Psychologie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Mar;54(3):975-995. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-03066-2. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
Prior cross-sectional research established that four distinct responses to sexual rejection are associated with sexual and relationship well-being among couples affected by Sexual Interest/Arousal Disorder (SIAD). Examining these associations daily and prospectively will provide insight into within-person variations, temporality, and directionality. Women and gender-diverse individuals diagnosed with SIAD and their partners (N = 232 couples) completed a baseline survey, 56-day diary, and 6-month follow-up survey, assessing responses to sexual rejection, sexual satisfaction, dyadic sexual desire, sexual distress, and relationship satisfaction. Post hoc exploratory analyses controlled for non-physical sexual coercion and sexual rejection frequency. On days when individuals with SIAD perceived or their partners reported greater understanding responses than usual, they both reported higher relationship satisfaction, but also greater sexual distress. Daily perceived or reported greater resentful or insecure responses were associated with lower sexual and relationship satisfaction, and greater sexual distress. Enticing responses showed mixed results. For partners, all daily self-reported response types were positively associated with their own dyadic sexual desire. Prospectively for individuals with SIAD perceiving greater understanding and lower resentful and enticing responses at baseline predicted their own greater sexual and relationship satisfaction and perceiving greater insecure responses predicted their partners' greater sexual satisfaction, six months later. For partners, greater insecure responses at baseline predicted their own lower sexual satisfaction and greater sexual distress six months later. Results suggest that partner responses to sexual rejection may be useful intervention targets aimed at promoting the sexual well-being and relationship satisfaction of couples coping with SIAD.
先前的横断面研究表明,在患有性兴趣/性唤起障碍(SIAD)的夫妻中,对性拒绝的四种不同反应与性健康和关系幸福感相关。每日前瞻性地研究这些关联,将有助于深入了解个体内部差异、时间性和方向性。被诊断患有SIAD的女性和性别多样化个体及其伴侣(N = 232对夫妻)完成了一项基线调查、为期56天的日记记录以及6个月的随访调查,评估对性拒绝的反应、性满意度、双方性欲望、性困扰和关系满意度。事后探索性分析控制了非身体性强迫和性拒绝频率。在患有SIAD的个体察觉到或其伴侣报告比平常有更多理解性反应的日子里,他们双方都报告了更高的关系满意度,但也有更大的性困扰。每日察觉到或报告有更多怨恨或不安反应与较低的性满意度和关系满意度以及更大的性困扰相关。诱惑性反应的结果不一。对于伴侣来说,所有每日自我报告的反应类型都与他们自己的双方性欲望呈正相关。前瞻性地看,对于患有SIAD的个体,在基线时察觉到更多理解性反应、更少怨恨和诱惑性反应,预测他们自己在六个月后有更高的性满意度和关系满意度,而察觉到更多不安反应则预测其伴侣在六个月后有更高的性满意度。对于伴侣来说,基线时更多的不安反应预测他们自己在六个月后有更低的性满意度和更大的性困扰。结果表明,伴侣对性拒绝的反应可能是旨在促进应对SIAD的夫妻的性健康和关系满意度的有用干预目标。