Carpenter Hannah, Campo-Engelstein Lisa
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Institute for Bioethics and Health Humanities, School of Public and Population Health, Galveston, TX, USA.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Feb;42(2):405-412. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03401-z. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
Egg donation is a procedure that is powerfully advertised as a beneficial experience with limited mention of the associated risks. Egg donor recruitment advertisements target young and financially insecure women and can serve as a catalyst for interest in egg donation. In the absence of explicit egg donation advertisement regulations and without counterbalancing information from other sources, potential donors may not be able to recognize how advertisements can be misleading. In this paper, we enumerate two types of misleading information in egg donor recruitment advertisements that can influence the decision to donate that might not exist otherwise: (1) the focus on financial benefits and (2) the minimization of health risks. We draw upon existing Federal Drug Administration and Federal Trade Commission regulations that govern other types of medical advertisements and demonstrate their suitability to govern egg donor recruitment advertisements. We conclude that similar regulations could address the regulatory gap in which egg donation advertisements are situated by ensuring that information is balanced and not overly persuasive, thus better protecting the autonomy of egg donors.
卵子捐赠是一种被大力宣传为有益经历的程序,而对相关风险却提及甚少。卵子捐赠者招募广告针对年轻且经济不稳定的女性,可能会激发她们对卵子捐赠的兴趣。在缺乏明确的卵子捐赠广告法规且没有其他来源的平衡信息的情况下,潜在捐赠者可能无法意识到广告可能具有误导性。在本文中,我们列举了卵子捐赠者招募广告中两类可能影响捐赠决定的误导性信息,而这些信息在其他情况下可能并不存在:(1)对经济利益的强调;(2)对健康风险的最小化。我们借鉴了美国食品药品监督管理局和联邦贸易委员会现有的管理其他类型医疗广告的法规,并证明它们适用于管理卵子捐赠者招募广告。我们得出结论,类似的法规可以通过确保信息平衡且不过度具有说服力来填补卵子捐赠广告所处的监管空白,从而更好地保护卵子捐赠者的自主权。