Guo Xiaowen, Qiao Yang, Yin Sijie, Luo Fengqin, Yi Lingmei, Chen Jiajia, Lu Man
Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), 54 Youdian Road, Hangzhou, 310006, China.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Jan 27;25(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-02907-4.
Ciprofol, a novel intravenous anesthetic, which has primarily been used for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in adults, is characterized by rapid onset, short duration of action, and quick and smooth recovery. However, the pharmacokinetic characteristics of continuous infusions and the correlation between the plasma concentration and the bispectral index (BIS) in elderly patients are still unknown.
In this randomized, controlled study, thirty elderly patients (62-78 years old) undergoing elective gastrointestinal tumor resection were treated with propofol (N = 15) or ciprofol (N = 15) as sedatives during anesthesia. After induction, ciprofol/propofol was continuously infused intravenously until the end of the operation. Perioperative vital signs, injection pain, adverse events (AEs), BIS values, eyelid reflex disappearance times, and recovery times were recorded. The plasma concentrations of ciprofol and propofol were measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC‒MS/MS) and the pharmacokinetics were determined by noncompartmental analysis.
Both drugs caused a decrease in blood pressure and heart rate after induction. Eight cases (53. 3%) of hypotension and 3 cases (20%) of bradycardia occurred in the propofol group, while 8 cases (53. 3%) of hypotension and 5 cases (33. 3%) of bradycardia occurred in the ciprofol group. At intubation, the ciprofol group experienced fewer fluctuations in blood pressure than the propofol group. Ciprofol resulted in only one case (6.7%) of mild injection pain, less than that produced by propofol (10/15, 66.7%) (P < 0.05). Anesthesia induction was successfully completed with both drugs, and there were no significant differences in eyelash reflex disappearance or recovery time between the two groups. The plasma concentrations during maintenance were relatively stable in both groups (propofol 1.78 ± 0.67 μg/mL, ciprofol 0.71 ± 0.23 μg/mL), and a suitable depth of sedation was achieved with a BIS of 40-60. The pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for ciprofol are listed as follows: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) 6.02 ± 2.13 μg/ml; Time to Maximum Concentration (Tmax) 0.18 ± 0.62 min; Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz) 3.96 ± 0.84 L/kg; Total Clearance (CL) 0.83 ± 0.14 L/h/kg; Half-life (t½) 3.47 ± 1.85 h; Area Under the Curve (AUC) 5000 ± 900 L/h/kg; Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) 0.23 ± 0.07 1/h. Similar to propofol, the plasma concentration of ciprofol was linearly correlated with the BIS.
Ciprofol, a novel intravenous anesthetic, can be safely and effectively used in elderly patient continuous infusion with minimal injection pain. Plasma concentrations of ciprofol correlate well with BIS values, helping control sedation depth. For elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal tumor surgery, an optimal maintenance dose of 0.8 mg/kg/h is recommended.
This clinical trial (registration No: ChiCTR2100047580, https://www.chictr.org.cn . The pre-registration date was June 20, 2021, and the review approval and official case solicitation began in December 2021; Retrospectively registered) was conducted in accordance with the World Medical Congress Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. All study subjects provided written informed consent.
环泊酚是一种新型静脉麻醉药,主要用于成人全身麻醉的诱导和维持,具有起效迅速、作用时间短、苏醒快且平稳的特点。然而,老年患者持续输注时的药代动力学特征以及血浆浓度与脑电双频指数(BIS)之间的相关性仍不清楚。
在这项随机对照研究中,30例择期行胃肠道肿瘤切除术的老年患者(62 - 78岁)在麻醉期间接受丙泊酚(N = 15)或环泊酚(N = 15)作为镇静剂治疗。诱导后,持续静脉输注环泊酚/丙泊酚直至手术结束。记录围手术期生命体征、注射痛、不良事件(AE)、BIS值、眼睑反射消失时间和苏醒时间。采用液相色谱串联质谱法(LC - MS/MS)测定环泊酚和丙泊酚的血浆浓度,并通过非房室分析确定药代动力学。
两种药物诱导后均导致血压和心率下降。丙泊酚组发生8例(53.3%)低血压和3例(20%)心动过缓,环泊酚组发生8例(53.3%)低血压和5例(33.3%)心动过缓。插管时,环泊酚组血压波动较丙泊酚组少。环泊酚仅导致1例(6.7%)轻度注射痛,少于丙泊酚组(10/15,66.7%)(P < 0.05)。两种药物均成功完成麻醉诱导,两组间睫毛反射消失或苏醒时间无显著差异。维持期间两组血浆浓度相对稳定(丙泊酚1.78±0.67μg/mL,环泊酚0.71±0.23μg/mL),BIS值为40 - 60时达到合适的镇静深度。环泊酚的药代动力学(PK)参数如下:最大血浆浓度(Cmax)6.02±2.13μg/ml;达峰时间(Tmax)0.18±0.62分钟;表观分布容积(Vz)3.96±0.84L/kg;总清除率(CL)0.83±0.14L/h/kg;半衰期(t½)3.47±1.85小时;曲线下面积(AUC)5000±900L/h/kg;末端消除速率常数(λz)0.23±0.07 1/h。与丙泊酚相似,环泊酚的血浆浓度与BIS呈线性相关。
环泊酚作为一种新型静脉麻醉药,可安全有效地用于老年患者持续输注,注射痛极小。环泊酚血浆浓度与BIS值相关性良好,有助于控制镇静深度。对于行胃肠道肿瘤手术的老年患者,推荐最佳维持剂量为0.8mg/kg/h。
本临床试验(注册号:ChiCTR2100047580,https://www.chictr.org.cn 。预注册日期为2021年6月20日,审查批准和正式病例征集于2021年12月开始;回顾性注册)按照世界医学大会赫尔辛基宣言和良好临床实践指南进行。所有研究对象均提供了书面知情同意书。