Musella Gennaro, Canfora Federica, Caponio Vito Carlo Alberto, Vardas Emmanouil, Kouri Maria, Nikitakis Nikolaos, Troiano Giuseppe, Aria Massimo, D'Aniello Luca, Lo Muzio Lorenzo, Mignogna Michele Davide, Adamo Daniela
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences, and Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
J Oral Rehabil. 2025 May;52(5):651-666. doi: 10.1111/joor.13945. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
According to the ICOP 2020, Burning Mouth Syndrome (BMS) is a chronic orofacial pain disorder characterised by an intraoral burning sensation, which represents the main diagnostic criterion. However, some patients experience other symptoms such as xerostomia, taste alterations, and globus, without the burning sensation (non-BMS).
This study aims to explore non-BMS as a distinct subclinical entity by comparing the classical BMS with this new group of patients in a case-control study, addressing gaps in current diagnostic criteria.
Eighty-three non-BMS patients were compared with an equal number of BMS patients matched for age and sex. Data on sociodemographic and risk factors, systemic comorbidities and drug intake, symptom patterns, psychological profiles were collected and statistically analysed.
No significant differences between BMS and non-BMS groups were found in sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, drug consumption and extraoral symptoms. Both groups reported similar symptoms patterns, with discomfort intensifying in the evening. Although oral symptoms prevalence varied, with the burning sensation exclusive to BMS patients, none of these differences reached statistical significance. Psychological assessments revealed mild depression (17 [14-19] vs. 17 [14-20], p 0.981), mild to moderate anxiety (18 [15-21] vs. 17 [15-20.5], p = 0.767), and sleep disturbance (5 [4-7] vs. 8 [5-10], p < 0.001) in both groups.
Non-BMS patients exhibit similarities to BMS patients yet remain unclassified under current diagnostic criteria. Therefore, we have suggested the term "Oral Dysaesthetic and Perceptual Disorder (ODPD)" to define these patients (non-BMS). This study emphasises the need to expand diagnostic criteria to better identify and manage ODPD patients.
根据《2020年国际灼口综合征分类与诊断标准》,灼口综合征(BMS)是一种慢性口腔面部疼痛障碍,其主要诊断标准为口腔内有烧灼感。然而,一些患者会出现其他症状,如口干、味觉改变和咽部异物感,而无烧灼感(非BMS)。
本病例对照研究旨在通过比较经典BMS患者与这一新患者群体,探索非BMS作为一种独特的亚临床实体,以填补当前诊断标准的空白。
将83例非BMS患者与83例年龄和性别匹配的BMS患者进行比较。收集并统计分析社会人口学和危险因素、全身合并症和药物摄入、症状模式、心理特征等数据。
BMS组和非BMS组在社会人口学特征、合并症、药物消耗和口腔外症状方面无显著差异。两组报告的症状模式相似,不适感在晚上加重。虽然口腔症状的患病率有所不同,烧灼感是BMS患者独有的症状,但这些差异均未达到统计学意义。心理评估显示,两组均有轻度抑郁(17[14-19]对17[14-20],p>0.981)、轻度至中度焦虑(18[15-21]对17[15-20.5],p = 0.767)和睡眠障碍(5[4-7]对8[5-10],p<0.001)。
非BMS患者与BMS患者表现出相似性,但根据当前诊断标准仍未分类。因此,我们建议用“口腔感觉异常和感知障碍(ODPD)”这一术语来定义这些患者(非BMS)。本研究强调需要扩大诊断标准,以更好地识别和管理ODPD患者。