Duncan Daniel R, Golden Clare, Larson Kara, Growdon Amanda S, Liu Enju
Aerodigestive Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Hospital Medicine Program, Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2025 Apr;80(4):623-632. doi: 10.1002/jpn3.12465. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
To evaluate diagnostic testing frequency/yield and determine drivers of hospital charges in a prospective cohort of infants with brief resolved unexplained event (BRUE) to test the hypothesis that length of stay (LOS), low-yield diagnostic testing, and repeat hospital visits increase costs.
We conducted a prospective cohort study of infants admitted after BRUE to determine how clinical practice impacts the cost of care. Charge data from our institution's billing records database included room and board, diagnostics, medications, and professional fees for index hospitalizations and 6-month follow-ups. Charts were reviewed for clinical data, testing results, and repeat hospitalizations. Parent-reported symptoms and management changes were obtained by questionnaires. Multivariable analyses with linear regression were conducted to determine risk factors for hospitalization charges and total charges including hospitalization and 6-month follow-up.
The cohort included 155 subjects with median index hospitalization charges of $11,256 and total charges of $15,675. Overall, 76% had persistent BRUE symptoms and 15% repeat hospitalization; 34% were treated with acid suppression. Only 9.7% of the tests performed provided a potential diagnosis, but the videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) had the highest yield with 70% abnormal. On multivariable analysis, LOS, VFSS, flexible laryngoscopy, electroencephalogram, and repeat hospital visits were all associated with increased charges (fold change: 142%-354%).
Hospitalization and follow-up care are costly after BRUE. Potentially modifiable drivers of charges include test number, LOS, and repeat hospital visits. Most testing is low-yield, but timely performance of VFSS may allow for cost-effective and appropriate treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia and prevention of persistent symptoms. Gastroenterologists are frequently involved in caring for these children and are uniquely positioned to help guide testing and treatment related to gastroesophageal reflux disease and oropharyngeal dysphagia.
评估诊断性检查的频率/产出,并确定患有短暂不明原因 resolved 事件(BRUE)的婴儿前瞻性队列中医院费用的驱动因素,以检验住院时间(LOS)、低产出诊断性检查和重复住院会增加成本这一假设。
我们对因 BRUE 入院的婴儿进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,以确定临床实践如何影响护理成本。来自我们机构计费记录数据库的费用数据包括索引住院和 6 个月随访的食宿、诊断、药物和专业费用。审查病历以获取临床数据、检查结果和重复住院情况。通过问卷调查获取家长报告的症状和管理变化。进行线性回归的多变量分析以确定住院费用和包括住院及 6 个月随访在内的总费用的风险因素。
该队列包括 155 名受试者,索引住院费用中位数为 11,256 美元,总费用为 15,675 美元。总体而言,76% 的患者有持续性 BRUE 症状,15% 重复住院;34% 接受了抑酸治疗。所进行的检查中只有 9.7% 提供了潜在诊断,但视频荧光吞咽造影检查(VFSS)的产出率最高,异常率为 70%。在多变量分析中,住院时间、VFSS、柔性喉镜检查、脑电图和重复住院均与费用增加相关(倍数变化:142% - 354%)。
BRUE 后住院和后续护理成本高昂。费用的潜在可改变驱动因素包括检查次数、住院时间和重复住院。大多数检查产出率低,但及时进行 VFSS 可能有助于对口咽吞咽困难进行经济有效的适当治疗并预防持续性症状。胃肠病学家经常参与这些儿童的护理,并且在帮助指导与胃食管反流病和口咽吞咽困难相关的检查和治疗方面具有独特优势。