• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The value of privacy for people with dementia.痴呆症患者隐私的价值。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 13;15:1437813. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1437813. eCollection 2024.
2
Dignity in people with dementia: A concept analysis.痴呆患者的尊严:概念分析。
Nurs Ethics. 2024 Nov;31(7):1220-1232. doi: 10.1177/09697330241262469. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
3
Respect for Autonomy and Dementia Care in Nursing Homes: Revising Beauchamp and Childress's Account of Autonomous Decision-Making.尊重自主权和养老院的痴呆症护理:修订比彻姆和蔡尔德斯的自主决策理论。
J Bioeth Inq. 2022 Sep;19(3):467-479. doi: 10.1007/s11673-022-10195-7. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
4
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
5
The ethics of pet robots in dementia care settings: Care professionals' and organisational leaders' ethical intuitions.痴呆症护理环境中宠物机器人的伦理问题:护理专业人员和组织领导者的伦理直觉。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 23;14:1052889. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1052889. eCollection 2023.
6
A balancing act: exploring ethical and legal concerns associated with release of personal information in alert systems for missing persons with dementia.一场平衡行动:探讨与痴呆症失踪人员警报系统中个人信息发布相关的伦理和法律问题。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 May 5;26(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01214-4.
7
Ethics of using assistive technology in the care for community-dwelling elderly people: an overview of the literature.辅助技术在社区居住老年人护理中的应用伦理:文献综述。
Aging Ment Health. 2011 May;15(4):419-27. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2010.543662.
8
Ethics of Sensor-Based Surveillance of People with Dementia in Clinical Practice.临床实践中对痴呆症患者基于传感器监测的伦理问题
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Apr 2;25(7):2252. doi: 10.3390/s25072252.
9
Electronic tracking devices in dementia care: A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature.电子追踪设备在痴呆症护理中的应用:基于论据的伦理学文献的系统评价。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 Jul-Aug;95:104419. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2021.104419. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
10
Critical reflections on the currently leading definition of sustainable employability.对当前可持续就业能力主导定义的批判性反思。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 Jun 1;42(6):557-560. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3585. Epub 2016 Aug 22.

本文引用的文献

1
[Ethical Aspects of Co-Intelligent Assisitive Technologies in Dementia Care].[痴呆症护理中协同智能辅助技术的伦理问题]
Psychiatr Prax. 2021 Mar;48(S 01):S37-S41. doi: 10.1055/a-1369-3178. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
2
Dignifying and undignifying aspects of care for people with dementia: a narrative review.痴呆症患者护理的有尊严和无尊严方面:叙事评论。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2020 Dec;34(4):818-838. doi: 10.1111/scs.12791. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
3
Privacy in Aged Care Monitoring Devices (ACMD): The Developers' Perspective.老年护理监测设备中的隐私问题:开发者视角
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 8;266:7-12. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190765.
4
Prediction and Early Detection of Alzheimer's Dementia: Professional Disclosure Practices and Ethical Attitudes.预测和早期发现阿尔茨海默病:专业披露实践和道德态度。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;62(1):145-155. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170443.
5
Data Security and Privacy in Apps for Dementia: An Analysis of Existing Privacy Policies.痴呆症应用程序中的数据安全与隐私:对现有隐私政策的分析
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;25(8):873-877. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
6
Patient, resident, or person: Recognition and the continuity of self in long-term care for older people.患者、居民或个人:老年人长期护理中自我的认知与连续性
J Aging Stud. 2015 Dec;35:95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
7
Sexual disinhibition and dementia.性抑制解除与痴呆症。
Psychogeriatrics. 2016 Mar;16(2):145-53. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12143. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
8
Women with dementia and their handbags: negotiating identity, privacy and 'home' through material culture.患有痴呆症的女性及其手提包:通过物质文化协商身份、隐私和“家”的意义。
J Aging Stud. 2014 Aug;30:14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
9
The influence of relationships on personhood in dementia care: a qualitative, hermeneutic study.人际关系对痴呆症护理中人格的影响:一项定性、诠释学研究。
BMC Nurs. 2013 Dec 20;12(1):29. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-12-29.
10
[Privacy: a most important dimension for the quality of life of nursing home residents].[隐私:养老院居民生活质量的一个极其重要的方面]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2013 Oct;46(7):639-44. doi: 10.1007/s00391-012-0464-6.

痴呆症患者隐私的价值。

The value of privacy for people with dementia.

作者信息

Buhr Eike, Schweda Mark

机构信息

Ethics in Medicine, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 13;15:1437813. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1437813. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1437813
PMID:39872432
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11770680/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The concept of privacy marks an astonishing gap in the discussion about care for people with dementia (PwD). In general, questions of privacy play an important role and attract much attention in the ethics of nursing care. Yet, when it comes to dementia care, there is hardly any systematic ethical debate on the topic at all. It almost seems as though PwD lost any plausible interest in privacy and no longer had a private sphere that needed to be considered or protected. However, this not only contradicts widespread moral intuitions but also ignores the views and needs of those affected.

ARGUMENTS

This conceptual analysis sets out to explore the value of privacy for PwD. We first outline the origins and dimensions of the concept of privacy itself and point out problems and limitations in the context of dementia. Especially the prevalent liberal conceptions' dependence on the idea of individual autonomy poses considerable challenges to an adequate understanding of the moral significance of privacy for PwD. Therefore, we subsequently examine alternative ways of conceptualizing the value of privacy in the context of dementia care.

CONCLUSION

We argue that autonomy-based concepts of privacy may still apply in the early stages of dementia. In the further course of the syndrome, however, the relevance of other normative aspects comes to the fore, especially respect for remaining personal preferences as well as objective criteria of dignity and well-being. Thus, we outline in a differentiated way how and to what extent privacy can be of normative importance even beyond the purview of autonomy and should consequently be considered in dementia care.

摘要

引言

隐私概念在关于痴呆症患者护理的讨论中存在惊人的空白。总体而言,隐私问题在护理伦理中起着重要作用并备受关注。然而,在痴呆症护理方面,几乎没有关于该主题的系统性伦理辩论。几乎就好像痴呆症患者对隐私失去了任何合理的兴趣,不再有需要被考虑或保护的私人领域。然而,这不仅与广泛的道德直觉相矛盾,也忽视了患者的观点和需求。

论点

本概念分析旨在探讨隐私对痴呆症患者的价值。我们首先概述隐私概念本身的起源和维度,并指出在痴呆症背景下的问题和局限性。特别是普遍的自由主义观念对个人自主性的依赖,对充分理解隐私对痴呆症患者的道德意义构成了相当大的挑战。因此,我们随后研究在痴呆症护理背景下将隐私价值概念化的替代方法。

结论

我们认为基于自主性的隐私概念可能仍适用于痴呆症的早期阶段。然而,在该综合征的进一步发展过程中,其他规范性方面的相关性变得突出,特别是对患者剩余个人偏好的尊重以及尊严和福祉的客观标准。因此,我们以一种有区别的方式概述了即使超出自主性范围,隐私如何以及在多大程度上具有规范性重要性,因此在痴呆症护理中应予以考虑。