Aarons D, Robinson R, Richardson R, Poirier G R
Contraception. 1985 Feb;31(2):177-84. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(85)90032-0.
Sixteen proteinase inhibitors were tested for their ability to compete with the natural seminal inhibitor for binding to the surface of murine epididymal sperm. The most effective competitors, 4-methylumbelliferyl-p-quanidinobenzoate (MUGB) and p-nitrophenyl-p-guanidinobenzoate (NPGB), are also effective inhibitors of both murine acrosin and in vitro fertilization of mouse gametes. The data support the suggestion that the inhibition of fertilization by these inhibitors may be effected by their action on the sperm surface rather than binding to enzymes located within the acrosome. Since the surface acceptor molecule recognizes a number of inhibitor types, as well as substrates for such enzymes as trypsin and acrosin, the acceptor's binding site may be similar to the active site on the enzyme.
测试了16种蛋白酶抑制剂与天然精液抑制剂竞争结合小鼠附睾精子表面的能力。最有效的竞争者,4-甲基伞形酮基-对-胍基苯甲酸酯(MUGB)和对硝基苯基-对-胍基苯甲酸酯(NPGB),也是小鼠顶体蛋白酶和小鼠配子体外受精的有效抑制剂。数据支持这样的观点,即这些抑制剂对受精的抑制作用可能是通过它们对精子表面的作用,而不是通过与顶体内的酶结合来实现的。由于表面受体分子识别多种抑制剂类型,以及诸如胰蛋白酶和顶体蛋白酶等酶的底物,受体的结合位点可能类似于酶的活性位点。