• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过肿瘤临床路径提高患者安全和风险管理。

Enhancing patient safety and risk management through clinical pathways in oncology.

作者信息

Milanesi Marco, Fiorito Rita, Caloccia Lara, Guglielmetti Chiara, Giganti Giulia, Andreasi Sara Elisa, Triarico Antonio

机构信息

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Jan 28;14(1):e003012. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003012.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003012
PMID:39875160
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11781099/
Abstract

The increasing emphasis on risk management and quality assessment in hospital management necessitates strict adherence to government and international standards. Those standards are particularly important, and certification requirements further underscore this need. The objective of this paper is to outline the application of the INTegrated Audit Model in a Comprehensive Cancer Center. This model represents a revised version of Tracer Methodology, for audit surveys, aimed at aligning audit activities with UNI EN ISO 9001:2015 and Joint Commission Standards for quality, patient safety and clinical risk management.Using the INTegrated Audit Model, a total of 7 tracers were conducted, and 31 units underwent auditing during the period spanning from 2022 to 2023. Each audit inquiry was documented, categorised and cross-referenced with International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and Joint Commission International (JCI) standards. Areas exhibiting the highest incidence of non-conformities and observations were systematically linked to relevant standards. Subsequently, a comprehensive analysis was conducted on the ensuing findings.The INTegrated Audit Model allowed for systematic data collection across clinical pathways, revealing prevalent issues and areas for improvement in patient care. By aligning identified topics with ISO and JCI standards, compliance with international guidelines was assessed, offering units insight into their current status and areas for enhancement.Overall, both auditees and auditors expressed satisfaction with the methodology and continuous training, highlighting its effectiveness in fostering collaboration, improving time management and promoting adherence to accreditation standards.The study highlights the effectiveness of the methodology in monitoring unit activities and adherence to clinical pathways and international standards applied to an oncological setting. Audits conducted with this approach provided a thorough assessment of critical areas impacting patient care and clinical governance, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of service delivery.

摘要

医院管理中对风险管理和质量评估的日益重视,使得必须严格遵守政府和国际标准。这些标准尤为重要,认证要求进一步凸显了这一需求。本文的目的是概述综合审计模型在综合癌症中心的应用。该模型是用于审计调查的追踪方法的修订版,旨在使审计活动与UNI EN ISO 9001:2015以及联合委员会关于质量、患者安全和临床风险管理的标准保持一致。使用综合审计模型,在2022年至2023年期间共进行了7次追踪,对31个科室进行了审计。每次审计询问都有记录、分类,并与国际标准化组织(ISO)和联合委员会国际部(JCI)的标准进行交叉引用。不符合项和观察结果发生率最高的领域与相关标准进行了系统关联。随后,对所得结果进行了全面分析。综合审计模型允许跨临床路径进行系统的数据收集,揭示患者护理中普遍存在的问题和改进领域。通过将确定的主题与ISO和JCI标准进行对照,评估了对国际准则的遵守情况,使各科室了解其当前状况和改进领域。总体而言,被审计方和审计人员都对该方法和持续培训表示满意,强调了其在促进协作、改善时间管理和促进遵守认证标准方面的有效性。该研究突出了该方法在监测科室活动以及遵守应用于肿瘤学环境的临床路径和国际标准方面的有效性。采用这种方法进行的审计对影响患者护理和临床治理的关键领域进行了全面评估,有助于全面了解服务提供情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16b3/11781099/b087d61e090f/bmjoq-14-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16b3/11781099/b087d61e090f/bmjoq-14-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16b3/11781099/b087d61e090f/bmjoq-14-1-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Enhancing patient safety and risk management through clinical pathways in oncology.通过肿瘤临床路径提高患者安全和风险管理。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Jan 28;14(1):e003012. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003012.
2
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
3
Challenges for Joint Commission International accreditation: performance of orthopedic surgeons based on International Patient Safety Goals.国际联合委员会认证面临的挑战:基于国际患者安全目标的骨科医生绩效评估。
Nagoya J Med Sci. 2021 Feb;83(1):87-92. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.83.1.87.
4
Need for User-Friendly Audit Tools: Investigating Dietitians' Use and Requirements of Clinical Documentation Audit Tools.对用户友好的审核工具的需求:调查营养师对临床文档审核工具的使用情况和需求。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Apr;38(2):e70058. doi: 10.1111/jhn.70058.
5
An experience in integrated management of clinical risks.临床风险综合管理的一次经验
J Healthc Qual Res. 2018 Nov-Dec;33(6):311-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
6
Using the SLIPTA checklist to assess laboratory readiness for Joint Commission International accreditation.使用SLIPTA检查表评估实验室为国际联合委员会认证做好准备的情况。
Afr J Lab Med. 2023 Mar 15;12(1):2044. doi: 10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.2044. eCollection 2023.
7
External inspection of compliance with standards for improved healthcare outcomes.对改善医疗结果标准的合规情况进行外部检查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 2;12(12):CD008992. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008992.pub3.
8
Association between the application of ISO 9001:2008 alone or in combination with health-specific standards and quality-related activities in Hungarian hospitals.匈牙利医院单独应用ISO 9001:2008或与特定健康标准结合应用与质量相关活动之间的关联。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Apr 1;29(2):283-289. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx016.
9
Effectiveness of external inspection of compliance with standards in improving healthcare organisation behaviour, healthcare professional behaviour or patient outcomes.外部合规检查在改善医疗机构行为、医疗专业人员行为或患者结局方面的有效性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9(11):CD008992. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008992.pub2.
10
Important factors for effective patient safety governance auditing: a questionnaire survey.有效患者安全管理审计的重要因素:问卷调查
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 20;18(1):798. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3577-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Health services under pressure: a scoping review and development of a taxonomy of adaptive strategies.健康服务面临压力:适应策略的范围综述和分类学发展。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Oct 18;33(11):738-747. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016686.
2
Revitalising audit and feedback to improve patient care.振兴审核和反馈以改善患者护理。
BMJ. 2020 Feb 27;368:m213. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m213.
3
Clinical audits to improve critical care: Part 2: Analyse, benchmark and feedback.临床审核以改善危重病治疗:第 2 部分:分析、基准测试和反馈。
Aust Crit Care. 2018 Mar;31(2):106-109. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
4
How can healthcare standards be standardised?医疗保健标准如何实现标准化?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Oct;24(10):615-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003955. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
5
Clinical audit, a valuable tool to improve quality of care: General methodology and applications in nephrology.临床审计——提高医疗质量的宝贵工具:一般方法及在肾脏病学中的应用
World J Nephrol. 2014 Nov 6;3(4):249-55. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v3.i4.249.
6
Guidelines for overcoming hospital managerial challenges: a systematic literature review.克服医院管理挑战的指南:一项系统的文献综述
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2013;9:427-41. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S54178. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
7
Clinical auditing to improve patient outcomes.临床审计以改善患者治疗效果。
Community Eye Health. 2010 Dec;23(74):48-9.