Suppr超能文献

健康和种植体周围炎牙种植体配对及非配对样本的黏膜下微生物组概况

Submucosal Microbiome Profiles in Paired and Unpaired Samples From Healthy and Peri-Implantitis Dental Implants.

作者信息

Tocarruncho Oscar Iván, Neuta Yineth, Lesmes Yamil, Castillo Diana Marcela, Leal Sandra, Chambrone Leandro, Lafaurie Gloria Inés

机构信息

Master Oral Science Program, School of Dentistry, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá-, Colombia.

Unit of Basic Oral Investigation-UIBO, School of Dentistry, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Feb;27(1):e13423. doi: 10.1111/cid.13423.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This cross-sectional study aimed to compare the composition of the submucosal microbiome of peri-implantitis with paired and unpaired healthy implant samples.

METHODS

We evaluated submucosal plaque samples obtained in 39 cases, including 13 cases of peri-implantitis, 13 cases involving healthy implants from the same patient (paired samples), and 13 cases involving healthy implants from different individuals (unpaired samples). The patients were evaluated using next-generation genomic sequencing (Illumina) based on 16S rRNA gene amplification. The sequences were grouped according to the amplicon sequence variant (ASV) to define the taxonomic categories. Alpha diversity was analyzed using Shannon's and Simpson's indices, while beta diversity was evaluated using principal coordinate analysis, analysis of similarities, and permutational multivariate variance analysis. Additionally, UniFrac distances were evaluated using Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology 2. Finally, we evaluated between-group differences in the taxonomic components.

RESULTS

There were no significant between-group differences in alpha diversity. The average bacterial ratios of Filifactor alocis, Porphyromona endodontalis, Tannerella forsythia, Treponema denticola, Peptostreptococcaceae [Eubacterium nodatum], Desulfobulbus sp. HTM 041, and Mogibacterium timidum significantly differed between peri-implantitis samples and unpaired samples from the healthy implants (p < 0.05). However, there were few differences in the microbiota between peri-implantitis samples and those paired with healthy implants in the same patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Future studies comparing the microbiome compositions using sequencing techniques between healthy implants and implants with peri-implantitis should focus on retrieving samples from the same patient, especially in individuals with a history of periodontitis.

摘要

背景

本横断面研究旨在比较种植体周围炎与配对及未配对健康种植体样本的黏膜下微生物群组成。

方法

我们评估了39例患者的黏膜下菌斑样本,其中包括13例种植体周围炎患者、13例来自同一患者的健康种植体样本(配对样本)以及13例来自不同个体的健康种植体样本(未配对样本)。基于16S rRNA基因扩增,使用下一代基因组测序(Illumina)对患者进行评估。根据扩增子序列变异(ASV)对序列进行分组,以定义分类类别。使用香农指数和辛普森指数分析α多样性,同时使用主坐标分析、相似性分析和置换多元方差分析评估β多样性。此外,使用微生物生态学定量见解2评估加权 UniFrac 距离。最后,我们评估了分类成分的组间差异。

结果

α多样性在组间无显著差异。丝状杆菌属、牙髓卟啉单胞菌、福赛坦氏菌、具核梭杆菌、消化链球菌科(具核真杆菌)、脱硫球菌属HTM 041和胆怯微杆菌在种植体周围炎样本与健康种植体未配对样本之间的平均细菌比例存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。然而,种植体周围炎样本与同一患者的健康种植体配对样本之间的微生物群差异较小。

结论

未来使用测序技术比较健康种植体与患有种植体周围炎的种植体微生物群组成的研究应侧重于从同一患者获取样本,尤其是有牙周炎病史的个体。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验