Özden Vahit Emre, Dikmen Göksel, Karaytuğ Kayahan, Mavi Arda, Köylüoğlu Yılmaz Onat, Tözün İsmail Remzi
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, International Joint Centre (IJC), Acibadem Maslak Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2024 Dec 31;58(6):341-345. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2024.24053.
This study aimed to investigate the distribution of knee phenotypes based on the CPAK classification in healthy nonarthritic subjects and osteoarthritic patients in Türkiye.
Radiological EOS analysis of nonarthritic 1172 knees and osteoarthritic 571 knees was evaluated to clarify the distribution of CPAK classification. The knees were categorized into 9 subgroups according to the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle (aHKA) angle and joint-line obliquity (JLO). The medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) were used to calculate aHKA and JLO. The Sectra workstation program was used for all radiological measurements.
In the nonarthritic group, CPAK distribution was 20.9% type I (n=245), 2.5% type II (n=30), 0.08% type III (n=1), 46.67% type IV (n=545), 7.7% type V (n=91), 0.7% type VI (n=9), 18% type VII (n=211), 2.9% type VIII (n=35), 0.2% type IX (n=3). The mean JLO was 173.7 ± 4.38, and the mean aHKA was 0.15 ± 3.81 in nonarthritic group. Arthritic group CPAK type distribution was 20.7% type I (n=118), 3.1% type II (n=18), 0.17% type III (n=1), 57.1% type IV (n=326), 8.4% type V (n=48), 0.17% type VI (n=1), 7.8% type VII (n=45), 1.4% type VIII (n=8), and 0.8% type IX (n=5). The mean JLO was 174.2 ± 3.78, and the mean aHKA was !2.21 ± 4.48 in the osteoarthritic group.
CPAK type IV and CPAK type I were the most common subgroups in the nonarthritic and arthritic groups. CPAK type 5, which is the target of the mechanical alignment strategy, is only 7.8% in the nonarthritic group and 8.4% in the osteoarthritic group in the Turkish population.
Level III, Diagnostic Study.
本研究旨在调查基于CPAK分类的膝关节表型在土耳其健康非关节炎受试者和骨关节炎患者中的分布情况。
对1172例非关节炎膝关节和571例骨关节炎膝关节进行放射学EOS分析,以明确CPAK分类的分布情况。根据算术髋-膝-踝(aHKA)角和关节线倾斜度(JLO)将膝关节分为9个亚组。使用胫骨近端内侧角(MPTA)和股骨远端外侧角(LDFA)来计算aHKA和JLO。所有放射学测量均使用Sectra工作站程序。
在非关节炎组中,CPAK分布为:I型20.9%(n = 245),II型2.5%(n = 30),III型0.08%(n = 1),IV型46.67%(n = 545),V型7.7%(n = 91),VI型0.7%(n = 9),VII型18%(n = 211),VIII型2.9%(n = 35)及IX型0.2%(n = 3)。非关节炎组的平均JLO为173.7±4.38,平均aHKA为0.15±3.81。骨关节炎组CPAK类型分布为:I型20.7%(n = 118),II型3.1%(n = 18),III型0.17%(n = 1),IV型57.1%(n = 326),V型8.4%(n = 48),VI型0.17%(n = 1),VII型7.8%(n = 45),VIII型1.4%(n = 8)及IX型0.8%(n = 5)。骨关节炎组的平均JLO为174.2±3.78,平均aHKA为-2.21±4.48。
CPAK IV型和CPAK I型分别是非关节炎组和骨关节炎组中最常见的亚组。机械对线策略的目标CPAK 5型在土耳其人群的非关节炎组中仅占7.8%,在骨关节炎组中占8.4%。
III级,诊断性研究。