Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Departments of Biostatistics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):2583-2592. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001178.
Few studies have reported the coronal constitutional alignment of the lower limbs in mainland China. This study aimed to analyse the distribution of the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification in the osteoarthritic (OA) and healthy Chinese populations.
The CPAK distributions of 246 patients (477 knees) with OA and 107 healthy individuals (214 knees) were retrospectively examined using long-leg radiographs. Radiological measurements and CPAK classification of different Kellgren-Lawrence grades in patients with unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were compared. The clinical outcomes of patients with CPAK type I who underwent mechanical alignment or restricted kinematic alignment during TKA were examined.
The most common distributions in the OA and healthy groups were type I and type II, respectively. In patients who underwent unilateral TKA, the most common distribution of knees graded as Kellgren-Lawrence 3-4 was type I. However, the most common distributions of contralateral knees graded as Grade 0-2 were type I and II. For patients with CPAK type I, the mechanical alignment and restricted kinematic alignment groups did not differ significantly concerning postoperative clinical outcomes at 3 months.
The most common distributions in Chinese osteoarthritic and healthy populations were types I and II, respectively. In addition, OA progression may lead to changes in the CPAK classification.
鲜有研究报道中国内地下肢的冠状面整体对线情况。本研究旨在分析膝骨关节炎(OA)患者和健康人群中膝关节冠状面排列(CPAK)分类的分布情况。
回顾性分析了 246 例(477 膝)OA 患者和 107 例健康个体(214 膝)的长下肢 X 线片,以评估其 CPAK 分布情况。比较了单侧全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者不同 Kellgren-Lawrence 分级的放射学测量值和 CPAK 分类,并对接受机械对线或限制运动对线 TKA 的 CPAK Ⅰ型患者的临床结果进行了检查。
OA 组和健康组中最常见的分布类型分别为Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型。在接受单侧 TKA 的患者中,Kellgren-Lawrence 分级 3-4 的膝关节最常见的分布类型为Ⅰ型,但分级 0-2 的对侧膝关节最常见的分布类型为Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型。对于 CPAK Ⅰ型患者,术后 3 个月时,机械对线组和限制运动对线组的临床结果无显著差异。
中国 OA 患者和健康人群中最常见的分布类型分别为Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型。此外,OA 进展可能导致 CPAK 分类的改变。