Jarosinski Marissa C, Reitz Katherine M, Khamzina Yekaterina, Liang Nathan L, Sridharan Natalie D, Tzeng Edith
Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh.
Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh.
JVS Vasc Insights. 2024;2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsvi.2024.100153. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
Antithrombotic therapy improves endovascular intervention outcomes for peripheral artery disease. However, there are limited data guiding the choice and duration of these adjuvant therapies. Thus, we explored current antithrombotic prescribing preferences among vascular interventionalists, hypothesizing that there are varied and inconsistent treatment practices among providers.
We developed and distributed a de-identified RedCap survey via Twitter and email to Vascular Quality Initiative members (February 2023). Multiple-choice questions queried antithrombotic agents and treatment durations for a clinical vignette (a claudicant on 81 mg aspirin and statin) with different arterial disease locations (iliac, femoropopliteal, or tibial vessels) and different revascularization strategies (angioplasty or stenting, with and without drug-coating). Antithrombotic options included monotherapies with antiplatelet agents or low-dose rivaroxaban; dual therapies with aspirin combined with a P2Y12 inhibitor (dual antiplatelet therapy, DAPT) or low-dose rivaroxaban (dual pathway inhibition or DPI); or triple therapy with aspirin, a P2Y12 inhibitor, and low-dose rivaroxaban. Options for therapy duration included 30, 90, 180, and 365 days, or indefinitely.
There were 199 respondents (17% female, 68% White race, 63% academic, 88% vascular surgery). Across all treatment scenarios, respondents selected DAPT (n = 171/199; 86%) in at least one revascularization scenario, followed by aspirin monotherapy (n = 83/199; 42%) and DPI (n = 49/199; 25%). Therapy choice did differ by both anatomic location and revascularization strategy ( < .05). DAPT was most selected following femoropopliteal revascularization (n = 165/199, 83%) and bare metal stenting (n = 162/198, 82%). However, aspirin monotherapy was most selected following iliac level revascularization (n = 52/197; 26%) and following percutaneous transluminal angioplasty at any level (n = 51/182; 28%). DPI was most selected following tibial revascularization (n = 39/184; 21%) and following percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (n = 38/182; 21%). Among those who selected DAPT, the 90-day (n = 99/171; 58%) duration was preferred. Those who selected DPI favored indefinite treatment durations (n = 34/49; 69%). Indefinite DAPT and DPI therapy were more commonly selected for distal level revascularization ( < .05). Rivaroxaban utilization was limited secondary to cost (n = 108/178; 61%), lack of demonstrated effectiveness (n = 75/178; 42%), and concern for safety and bleeding (n = 27/178; 15%).
Following lower extremity endovascular treatment of peripheral artery disease, a 90-day duration of DAPT remains the most commonly selected antithrombotic regimen despite the emergence of DPI as an evidence-based antithrombotic therapy. The variability in provider preferred antithrombotic agent and treatment duration emphasizes the need for high-quality evidence for the medical optimization of revascularization outcomes.
抗栓治疗可改善外周动脉疾病的血管内介入治疗效果。然而,指导这些辅助治疗选择和持续时间的数据有限。因此,我们探讨了血管介入医生目前的抗栓处方偏好,假设不同医生的治疗方法存在差异且不一致。
我们通过Twitter和电子邮件向血管质量倡议组织成员(2023年2月)发放了一份去识别化的RedCap调查问卷。多项选择题询问了针对一个临床案例(一名服用81毫克阿司匹林和他汀类药物的间歇性跛行患者)在不同动脉疾病部位(髂动脉、股腘动脉或胫动脉)和不同血管重建策略(血管成形术或支架置入术,有无药物涂层)的抗栓药物和治疗持续时间。抗栓选择包括抗血小板药物单药治疗或低剂量利伐沙班;阿司匹林联合P2Y12抑制剂的双联治疗(双联抗血小板治疗,DAPT)或低剂量利伐沙班(双途径抑制或DPI);或阿司匹林、P2Y12抑制剂和低剂量利伐沙班的三联治疗。治疗持续时间的选项包括30天、90天、180天和365天,或无限期。
共有199名受访者(17%为女性,68%为白人,63%来自学术机构,88%为血管外科医生)。在所有治疗方案中,受访者在至少一种血管重建方案中选择DAPT(n = 171/199;86%),其次是阿司匹林单药治疗(n = 83/199;42%)和DPI(n = 49/199;25%)。治疗选择因解剖位置和血管重建策略而异(P <.05)。股腘动脉血管重建(n = 165/199,83%)和裸金属支架置入术后(n = 162/198,82%)最常选择DAPT。然而,髂动脉水平血管重建后(n = 52/197;26%)和任何水平的经皮腔内血管成形术后(n = 51/182;28%)最常选择阿司匹林单药治疗。胫动脉血管重建后(n = 39/184;21%)和经皮腔内血管成形术后(n = 38/182;21%)最常选择DPI。在选择DAPT的患者中,90天疗程(n = 99/171;58%)更受青睐。选择DPI的患者倾向于无限期治疗(n = 34/49;69%)。远端血管重建更常选择无限期DAPT和DPI治疗(P <.05)。由于成本(n = 108/178;61%)、缺乏有效性证据(n = 75/178;42%)以及对安全性和出血的担忧(n = 27/178;15%),利伐沙班的使用受到限制。
在外周动脉疾病的下肢血管内治疗后,尽管DPI已成为一种循证抗栓治疗方法,但90天的DAPT疗程仍是最常选择的抗栓方案。医生对抗栓药物和治疗持续时间偏好的差异强调了需要高质量证据来优化血管重建效果的药物治疗。