OKunewick J P, Buffo M J, Kociban D L
Exp Hematol. 1985;13 Suppl 16:23-30.
Mitoxantrone (DHAD) is a recently developed cancer chemotherapeutic drug proposed as a possible substitute for the older established chemotherapeutic, doxorubicin (adriamycin, or ADR). We have directly compared the toxicity of DHAD and ADR against normal hematopoietic progenitors in a mouse model. Using doses that produced equal depressions in spleen weight, we examined the recovery patterns for pluripotent hematopoietic stem cells (CFU-S), myeloid cell progenitors (CFU-GM), and reticulocyte (Retic) production. The spleen weight depression assay indicated that, on a mg/kg basis, DHAD was more toxic to the organ than ADR, with 17.5 mg of ADR required to produce the same level of effect as 10 mg of DHAD. Recovery of splenic mass after exposure to these doses was also poorer in the DHAD-treated mice. CFU-S studies showed that the initial direct killing effects of pluripotent stem cells by the two drugs were equivalent, but that CFU-S recovery was better after ADR exposure than after DHAD exposure. By 12 days after exposure to ADR, the number of CFU-S per spleen had not only regained normal levels, but exceeded the normal by a factor of 2. In contrast, in the DHAD-treated mice the number was only half normal at this same time. The results suggest that there is a delay in recovery of the pluripotent stem cell compartment after DHAD exposure that may be due to some type of unrepaired damage to the support tissue in the spleen on which the CFU-S are dependent. Analysis of the effects of DHAD and ADR on CFU-GM indicated an initial toxic effect that was roughly equivalent for the two drugs at the doses used. However, the timing of the points of maximum suppression were different--earlier after exposure to DHAD than after ADR. Subsequently, the recovery patterns were quite similar for both drugs, and at 14 days the CFU-GM numbers were virtually normal. Reticulocyte assay indicated that both ADR and DHAD severely depressed red blood cell production. Recovery was rapid and complete by nine days, however, with significant overshoots, especially in the case of ADR exposure. Serial white blood cell (WBC) counts were also carried out. Reduction in total WBC number was evident between two and 11 days after exposure and more severe with DHAD than with ADR. However, neither the extent of suppression nor its duration accurately reflected the events occurring in the CFU-S or CFU-GM progenitor compartments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
米托蒽醌(DHAD)是一种最近研发的癌症化疗药物,被提议作为较老的已确立的化疗药物阿霉素(阿霉素,或ADR)的一种可能替代品。我们在小鼠模型中直接比较了DHAD和ADR对正常造血祖细胞的毒性。使用产生相同脾脏重量降低的剂量,我们检测了多能造血干细胞(CFU-S)、髓系细胞祖细胞(CFU-GM)和网织红细胞(Retic)产生的恢复模式。脾脏重量降低试验表明,以毫克/千克为基础,DHAD对该器官的毒性比ADR更大,产生与10毫克DHAD相同效果水平需要17.5毫克ADR。在接受这些剂量处理后,DHAD处理组小鼠的脾脏重量恢复也较差。CFU-S研究表明,两种药物对多能干细胞的初始直接杀伤作用相当,但ADR处理后CFU-S的恢复比DHAD处理后更好。在接受ADR处理12天后,每个脾脏的CFU-S数量不仅恢复到正常水平,而且超过正常水平两倍。相比之下,在DHAD处理的小鼠中,此时该数量仅为正常的一半。结果表明,DHAD处理后多能干细胞区室的恢复存在延迟,这可能是由于CFU-S所依赖的脾脏支持组织受到某种类型的未修复损伤。对DHAD和ADR对CFU-GM的影响分析表明,在所使用的剂量下,两种药物的初始毒性作用大致相当。然而,最大抑制点的时间不同——DHAD处理后比ADR处理后更早。随后,两种药物的恢复模式非常相似,在14天时CFU-GM数量几乎恢复正常。网织红细胞检测表明,ADR和DHAD都严重抑制红细胞生成。然而,到第9天恢复迅速且完全,有明显的超调现象,尤其是在ADR处理的情况下。还进行了连续白细胞(WBC)计数。在处理后第2天至第11天,总白细胞数量明显减少,且DHAD比ADR更严重。然而,抑制程度及其持续时间均未准确反映CFU-S或CFU-GM祖细胞区室中发生的情况。(摘要截断于400字)