Huybrechts M, Symann M, Trouet A
Cancer Res. 1979 Sep;39(9):3738-43.
We have compared daunorubicin (DNR)-DNA with free DNR and doxorubicin (DOX)-DNA with free DOX for their effects in vivo in mice on pluripotent stem cells and granulocytic committed stem cells. Dose-survival, time-survival, and recovery curves were obtained after one i.v. injection of either drug. The dose-survival curves of colony-forming units-spleen (CFU-S) and colony-forming units-committed stem cells (CFU-C) were exponential in shape with both agents. DNR-DNA appeared more toxic to the hemopoietic precursor cells than did free DNR. In contrast, DOX-DNA was less toxic toward CFU-S and as toxic as DOX toward CFU-C. Time-survival curves indicated a minimum level of CFU-S and CFU-C at about 33 hr. After that, the recovery of CFU-S was rapid for DNR-treated mice but remained below 50% of the controls on Day 12 for the DNR-DNA-treated group. In mice previously given injections of DOX or DOX-DNA, the recovery of the CFU-S was more protracted in time with a better recovery in mice treated with DOX-DNA. Both DNR and DNR-DNA induced an initial CFU-C decrease followed by a rapid but transient rise with a maximum on Day 4 after chemotherapy. On Day 12, the CFU-C recovery was still incomplete in both DNR- and DNR-DNA-treated mice. In the groups treated with DOX, the CFU-C recovery was more important after DOX-DNA complex than after free DOX. The results are discussed in view of the "lysosomotropic chemotherapy" hypothesis.
我们比较了柔红霉素(DNR)-DNA与游离DNR以及阿霉素(DOX)-DNA与游离DOX对小鼠体内多能干细胞和粒细胞定向干细胞的作用。静脉注射其中一种药物后,获得了剂量-存活、时间-存活和恢复曲线。两种药物处理后,脾集落形成单位(CFU-S)和定向干细胞集落形成单位(CFU-C)的剂量-存活曲线均呈指数形式。与游离DNR相比,DNR-DNA对造血前体细胞的毒性似乎更大。相反,DOX-DNA对CFU-S的毒性较小,对CFU-C的毒性与DOX相同。时间-存活曲线表明,CFU-S和CFU-C在约33小时时达到最低水平。此后,DNR处理的小鼠CFU-S恢复迅速,但DNR-DNA处理组在第12天时仍低于对照组的50%。在先前注射过DOX或DOX-DNA的小鼠中,DOX-DNA处理的小鼠CFU-S恢复时间更长,但恢复情况更好。DNR和DNR-DNA均导致初始CFU-C减少,随后迅速但短暂上升,化疗后第4天达到最大值。在第12天时,DNR和DNR-DNA处理的小鼠CFU-C恢复仍不完全。在DOX处理组中,DOX-DNA复合物处理后的CFU-C恢复比游离DOX处理后更显著。根据“溶酶体亲和化疗”假说对结果进行了讨论。