Suppr超能文献

商业分析参考标准在化学风险控制中的关键作用:以全氟和多氟烷基物质为例及未来方向

The Critical Role of Commercial Analytical Reference Standards in the Control of Chemical Risks: The Case of PFAS and Ways Forward.

作者信息

Trier Xenia, van-Leeuwen Stefan P J, Brambilla Gianfranco, Weber Roland, Webster Thomas F

机构信息

Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Wageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 2025 Jan;133(1):15001. doi: 10.1289/EHP12331. Epub 2025 Jan 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Various countries have instituted risk governance measures to control and minimize the risks of chemicals at the national and international levels. Activities typically include risk assessment based on ) hazard and exposure assessments; ) setting limits on the production, use, and emissions of chemicals; ) enforcement of regulations; and ) monitoring the effectiveness of the measures taken. These steps largely depend on chemical analysis and access to pure chemical reference standards. However, except for specific highly regulated categories of chemicals, such reference standards often are not commercially available. This raises a critical question: Given the widespread lack of reference standards, is the current approach to governing chemicals adequate to protect humans and the environment from harm? If not, what measures could be taken to improve the situation?

OBJECTIVE

We outline how current chemical risk governance is hampered by the widespread lack of reference standards to produce the required scientific evidence. We also provide a list of recommendations for controlling chemical risks in the absence of reference standards.

DISCUSSION

We use per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), specifically the chemical C6O4 [perfluoro ([5-methoxy-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl]oxy) acetic acid], to illustrate how companies that produce chemicals can prevent access to reference standards. We argue that the very limited availability of reference standards undermines the ability of scientists to produce independent scientific evidence needed for chemical risk governance and, thereby, prevents society from protecting people and the environment against chemical pollution and its harms. Possible ways to improve the situation include ) guaranteeing access to chemical reference standards by creating a reference standards repository, ) redefining the level of confidence sufficient for regulatory action, ) providing alternative options for chemical identification and quantification when reference standards are not available, and ) considering, when no reference standards are available, regulation of chemicals by class rather than individually. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12331.

摘要

背景

各国已在国家和国际层面制定了风险治理措施,以控制和最小化化学品风险。这些活动通常包括:基于(1)危害和暴露评估进行风险评估;(2)设定化学品生产、使用和排放的限制;(3)执行法规;以及(4)监测所采取措施的有效性。这些步骤在很大程度上依赖于化学分析以及获取纯化学参考标准品。然而,除了特定的受到严格监管的化学品类别外,此类参考标准品通常无法通过商业途径获得。这就引发了一个关键问题:鉴于参考标准品普遍缺乏,当前的化学品治理方法是否足以保护人类和环境免受危害?如果不足,可采取哪些措施来改善这种情况?

目的

我们概述了当前化学品风险治理如何因普遍缺乏参考标准品而无法提供所需的科学证据而受到阻碍。我们还提供了一份在缺乏参考标准品的情况下控制化学品风险的建议清单。

讨论

我们以全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFASs),特别是化学物质C6O4 [全氟([5-甲氧基-1,3-二氧戊环-4-基]氧基)乙酸]为例,来说明化学品生产企业如何能够阻止获取参考标准品。我们认为,参考标准品的可得性非常有限,这削弱了科学家提供化学品风险治理所需独立科学证据的能力,从而使社会无法保护人类和环境免受化学污染及其危害。改善这种情况的可能方法包括:(1)通过建立参考标准品库来确保获取化学参考标准品;(2)重新定义足以采取监管行动的置信水平;(3)在没有参考标准品时提供化学品识别和定量的替代方法;以及(4)在没有参考标准品时,考虑按类别而非个别地对化学品进行监管。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12331

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de72/11776498/95471e080e48/ehp12331_f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验