Suppr超能文献

针对社区痴呆患者及其照料者的姑息治疗项目:IN-PEACE随机临床试验

Palliative Care Program for Community-Dwelling Individuals With Dementia and Caregivers: The IN-PEACE Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Sachs Greg A, Johnson Nina M, Gao Sujuan, Torke Alexia M, Hickman Susan E, Pemberton Amy, Vrobel Andrea, Pan Minmin, West Jennifer, Kroenke Kurt

机构信息

Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis.

Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.

出版信息

JAMA. 2025 Mar 18;333(11):962-971. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.25845.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Care management benefits community-dwelling patients with dementia, but studies include few patients with moderate to severe dementia or from racial and ethnic minority populations, lack palliative care, and seldom reduce health care utilization.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether integrated dementia palliative care reduces dementia symptoms, caregiver depression and distress, and emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations compared with usual care in moderate to severe dementia.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized clinical trial of community-dwelling patients with moderate to severe dementia and their caregivers enrolled from March 2019 to December 2020 from 2 sites in central Indiana (2-year follow-up completed on January 7, 2023). Electronic health record screening identified patients with dementia; caregivers confirmed eligibility, including dementia stage.

INTERVENTION

The intervention consisted of monthly calls from a trained nurse or social worker and evidence-based protocols to help caregivers manage patients' neuropsychiatric symptoms, caregiver distress, and palliative care issues (eg, advance care planning, symptoms, and hospice) (n = 99). Usual care caregivers received written dementia resource information and patients received care from usual clinicians (n = 102).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) severity score (scores range from 0-36, with higher scores indicating worse patient symptoms). Secondary outcomes included Symptom Management in End-of-Life Dementia scores, caregiver depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-8) scores, caregiver distress (NPI-Q distress) scores, and combined ED and hospitalization events. Outcomes were assessed quarterly for 24 months or until patient death.

RESULTS

A total of 201 dyads were enrolled (patients were 67.7% female; 43.3% African American; mean [SD] age, 83.6 [7.9] years); 3 dyads withdrew and 83 patients died over the course of the study, with at least 90% of eligible dyads in both groups completing each of the quarterly assessments. For the dementia palliative care vs usual care groups, mean NPI-Q severity scores were 9.92 vs 9.41 at baseline and 9.15 vs 9.39 at 24 months, respectively (between-group difference at 24 months, -0.24 [95% CI, -2.33 to 1.84]). There was no significant difference in the rate of change in NPI-Q severity from baseline between groups over time (P = .87 for the group and time interaction). There were no significant differences in the secondary outcomes, except that there were fewer combined ED and hospitalization events in the dementia palliative care group (mean events/patient, 1.06 in dementia palliative care vs 2.37 in usual care; between-group difference, -1.31 [95% CI, -1.93 to -0.69]; relative risk, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.65]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among community-dwelling patients with moderate to severe dementia and their caregivers, dementia palliative care, compared with usual care, did not significantly improve patients' neuropsychiatric symptoms through 24 months.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03773757.

摘要

重要性

照护管理对社区居住的痴呆症患者有益,但研究纳入的中度至重度痴呆症患者或少数族裔患者较少,缺乏姑息治疗,且很少能降低医疗保健利用率。

目的

确定与中度至重度痴呆症的常规护理相比,综合痴呆症姑息治疗是否能减轻痴呆症状、照顾者的抑郁和痛苦,以及减少急诊科就诊和住院次数。

设计、地点和参与者:一项针对社区居住的中度至重度痴呆症患者及其照顾者的随机临床试验,于2019年3月至2020年12月在印第安纳州中部的2个地点招募(2023年1月7日完成2年随访)。通过电子健康记录筛查确定痴呆症患者;照顾者确认资格,包括痴呆症阶段。

干预措施

干预包括由经过培训的护士或社会工作者每月进行电话随访,并采用循证方案,以帮助照顾者管理患者的神经精神症状、照顾者痛苦和姑息治疗问题(如预先护理计划、症状和临终关怀)(n = 99)。常规护理的照顾者收到书面的痴呆症资源信息,患者接受常规临床医生的治疗(n = 102)。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是神经精神症状问卷(NPI-Q)严重程度评分(评分范围为0 - 36,分数越高表明患者症状越严重)。次要结局包括临终痴呆症症状管理评分、照顾者抑郁(患者健康问卷 - 8)评分、照顾者痛苦(NPI-Q痛苦)评分,以及急诊科就诊和住院事件的综合情况。每季度评估结局,持续24个月或直至患者死亡。

结果

共纳入201对(患者中67.7%为女性;43.3%为非裔美国人;平均[标准差]年龄为83.6[7.9]岁);3对退出,83名患者在研究过程中死亡,两组中至少90%符合条件的对完成了每一次季度评估。对于痴呆症姑息治疗组与常规护理组,基线时NPI-Q严重程度平均评分分别为9.92和9.41,24个月时分别为9.15和9.39(24个月时组间差异为 - 0.24[95%置信区间,-2.33至1.84])。随着时间推移,两组间NPI-Q严重程度从基线开始的变化率无显著差异(组与时间交互作用的P值为0.87)。次要结局无显著差异,只是痴呆症姑息治疗组的急诊科就诊和住院事件综合情况较少(痴呆症姑息治疗组平均事件/患者为1.06,常规护理组为2.37;组间差异为 - 1.31[95%置信区间,-1.93至 - 0.69];相对风险为0.45[95%置信区间,0.31至0.65])。

结论及意义

在社区居住的中度至重度痴呆症患者及其照顾者中,与常规护理相比,痴呆症姑息治疗在24个月内未显著改善患者的神经精神症状。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03773757。

相似文献

7
Case management approaches to home support for people with dementia.针对痴呆症患者居家支持的个案管理方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 5;1(1):CD008345. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008345.pub2.
8
Palliative care interventions in advanced dementia.晚期痴呆症的姑息治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 2;12(12):CD011513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011513.pub2.

本文引用的文献

2
2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.2024 年阿尔茨海默病事实和数据。
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 May;20(5):3708-3821. doi: 10.1002/alz.13809. Epub 2024 Apr 30.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验