• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与成年人网络欺诈受害相关的个人、环境和行为预测因素。

Personal, environmental and behavioral predictors associated with online fraud victimization among adults.

作者信息

Balakrishnan Vimala, Ahhmed Umayma, Basheer Faris

机构信息

Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 29;20(1):e0317232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317232. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0317232
PMID:39879178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11778706/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Online malicious attempts such as scamming continue to proliferate across the globe, aided by the ubiquitous nature of technology that makes it increasingly easy to dupe individuals. This study aimed to identify the predictors for online fraud victimization focusing on Personal, Environment and Behavior (PEB).

METHODS

Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) was used as a guide in developing the PEB framework. Specifically, three factors were identified-Self-awareness (Personal), Attitude (Personal and Environment) and Safe Practice (Behavior) as the potential predictors for online fraud victimization. A self-reporting questionnaire was developed based on the PEB framework and used to collect data targeting Malaysian adults. The study reports result from two separate datasets collected across two separate timelines. Study I involved data collection in January 2023 (n = 820) whereas Study II was conducted with a modified questionnaire from November 2023 -January 2024 (n = 629). Study I identified the online fraud victimization predictors through an Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and a hierarchical binary logistic regression. The dataset from Study II was used to validate the online fraud victimization model derived from Study I by executing another round of hierarchical binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

Results from both the samples show that most of the respondents are aware of digital privacy. EFA from Study I yielded a five-factor solution with a total variance of 60.6%, namely, Self-awareness, Safe Practice, Bank Trust, Overconfidence and Social Influence. Hierarchical binary logistic regression results from both the studies were found to be consistent. Specifically, Overconfidence (β = 0.374; OR = 1.453; 95% CI [1.119, 1.887]; p = 0.005) and Social Influence (β = 0.332; OR = 1.225; 95% CI [1.077, 1.512]; p = 0.006) were found to significantly predict online fraud victimization as well as gender (β = 0.364; OR = 1.440; 95% CI [1.008, 2.016]; p = 0.045) with females exhibiting higher risks to victimization.

IMPLICATIONS

The emergence of Overconfidence and Social Influence as significant predictors can guide the development of targeted online fraud awareness campaigns and/or tools emphasizing critical thinking and skepticism. Policymakers can leverage this knowledge to implement regulations that reduce deceptive practices online, promote digital literacy programs, and mandate clearer consumer protections to mitigate the impact of social manipulation and overconfidence on fraud victimization.

CONCLUSION

This study identifies online fraud victimization predictors, hence improving our understanding of the factors behind this phenomenon-allowing for the development of effective preventive measures and policies to safeguard individuals and improve digital security. For instance, gender- specific educational campaigns can be developed to enhance awareness and equip women with strategies to detect and avoid scams. Additionally, addressing systemic factors like social norms and digital literacy gaps is crucial for creating equitable and effective solutions to reduce online fraud victimization.

摘要

背景

诸如诈骗之类的在线恶意行为在全球范围内持续激增,技术的普及使得欺骗个人变得越来越容易,这助长了此类行为的泛滥。本研究旨在确定聚焦于个人、环境和行为(PEB)的在线欺诈受害情况的预测因素。

方法

社会认知理论(SCT)被用作构建PEB框架的指导。具体而言,确定了三个因素——自我意识(个人)、态度(个人和环境)和安全实践(行为)作为在线欺诈受害情况的潜在预测因素。基于PEB框架开发了一份自我报告问卷,并用于收集针对马来西亚成年人的数据。该研究报告了在两个不同时间线收集的两个独立数据集的结果。研究一涉及2023年1月的数据收集(n = 820),而研究二则使用2023年11月至2024年1月修改后的问卷进行(n = 629)。研究一通过探索性因素分析(EFA)和分层二元逻辑回归确定在线欺诈受害情况的预测因素。研究二的数据集用于通过执行另一轮分层二元逻辑回归来验证从研究一得出的在线欺诈受害情况模型。

结果

两个样本的结果均表明,大多数受访者了解数字隐私。研究一的EFA得出了一个五因素解决方案,总方差为60.6%,即自我意识、安全实践、银行信任、过度自信和社会影响。两项研究的分层二元逻辑回归结果一致。具体而言,发现过度自信(β = 0.374;OR = 1.453;95% CI [1.119, 1.887];p = 0.005)和社会影响(β = 0.332;OR = 1.225;95% CI [1.077, 1.512];p = 0.006)以及性别(β = 0.364;OR = 1.440;95% CI [1.008, 2.016];p = 0.045)能显著预测在线欺诈受害情况,女性受害风险更高。

启示

过度自信和社会影响作为重要预测因素的出现,可以指导开展有针对性的在线欺诈意识宣传活动和/或工具的开发,强调批判性思维和怀疑态度。政策制定者可以利用这些知识实施法规,减少在线欺骗行为,推广数字素养计划,并强制实施更明确的消费者保护措施,以减轻社会操纵和过度自信对欺诈受害情况的影响。

结论

本研究确定了在线欺诈受害情况的预测因素,从而增进了我们对这一现象背后因素的理解,有助于制定有效的预防措施和政策来保护个人并改善数字安全。例如,可以开展针对性别的教育活动,提高意识并为女性提供检测和避免诈骗的策略。此外,解决社会规范和数字素养差距等系统性因素对于创建公平有效的解决方案以减少在线欺诈受害情况至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02fe/11778706/a341119d0462/pone.0317232.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02fe/11778706/a341119d0462/pone.0317232.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02fe/11778706/a341119d0462/pone.0317232.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Personal, environmental and behavioral predictors associated with online fraud victimization among adults.与成年人网络欺诈受害相关的个人、环境和行为预测因素。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 29;20(1):e0317232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317232. eCollection 2025.
2
How Does Survey Context Impact Self-reported Fraud Victimization?调查情境如何影响自我报告的欺诈受害情况?
Gerontologist. 2017 Apr 1;57(2):329-340. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv082.
3
Risk Factors for Social Networking Site Scam Victimization Among Malaysian Students.马来西亚学生社交网站诈骗受害的风险因素。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2018 Feb;21(2):123-128. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0714. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
4
The role of social-psychological factors of victimity on victimization of online fraud in China.在中国,受害的社会心理因素对网络诈骗受害情况的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 23;13:1030670. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1030670. eCollection 2022.
5
Understanding the Dynamics of Unwanted Online Sexual Solicitation Among Youth in Taiwan: Vulnerability and Resilience Factors.理解台湾青少年遭受不良网络性引诱的动态:脆弱性和适应力因素。
Arch Sex Behav. 2023 Oct;52(7):2799-2810. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02719-y. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
6
Prevalence of Financial Fraud and Scams Among Older Adults in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.美国老年人中金融欺诈和诈骗的患病率:系统评价与荟萃分析
Am J Public Health. 2017 Aug;107(8):e13-e21. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303821. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
7
The Effects of Risky Behaviors and Social Factors on the Frequency of Fraud Victimization Among Known Victims.危险行为和社会因素对已知受害者中欺诈受害频率的影响。
Innov Aging. 2024 Dec 30;9(2):igae111. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igae111. eCollection 2025.
8
In their own words: deception detection by victims and near victims of fraud.用他们自己的话说:欺诈受害者及准受害者的欺诈检测
Front Psychol. 2023 May 12;14:1135369. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1135369. eCollection 2023.
9
Victimization After Meeting With Online Acquaintances: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Adolescents in Malaysia.与网友见面后的受害情况:马来西亚青少年的横断面调查。
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Aug;33(15):2352-2378. doi: 10.1177/0886260515625502. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
10
Big Five Personality Traits of Cybercrime Victims.网络犯罪受害者的五大人格特质。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017 Jul;20(7):407-412. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2017.0028. Epub 2017 Jun 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Thwarting Instant Messaging Phishing Attacks: The Role of Self-Efficacy and the Mediating Effect of Attitude towards Online Sharing of Personal Information.阻止即时通讯网络钓鱼攻击:自我效能感的作用及对个人信息在线分享态度的中介效应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 16;20(4):3514. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043514.
2
To share or not to share - The underlying motives of sharing fake news amidst the COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia.分享还是不分享——马来西亚新冠疫情期间分享假新闻的潜在动机。
Technol Soc. 2021 Aug;66:101676. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101676. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
3
Vulnerability and fraud: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic.
脆弱性与欺诈行为:来自新冠疫情的证据
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2022;9(1):424. doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01445-5. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
4
Cyberbullying Characteristics and Prevention-What Can We Learn from Narratives Provided by Adolescents and Their Teachers?网络欺凌的特征和预防——我们能从青少年及其教师提供的叙述中学到什么?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 14;19(18):11589. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811589.
5
Social Networking Use Across Gender: Its Association with Social Connectedness and Happiness Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间不同性别的社交网络使用情况:其与社会联系及幸福感的关联
J Technol Behav Sci. 2022;7(3):396-405. doi: 10.1007/s41347-022-00262-6. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
6
Business models shifts: Impact of Covid-19.商业模式转变:新冠疫情的影响
Int J Inf Manage. 2020 Oct;54:102173. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102173. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
7
Susceptibility to phishing on social network sites: A personality information processing model.社交网站上对网络钓鱼的易感性:一种人格信息处理模型。
Comput Secur. 2020 Jul;94:101862. doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2020.101862. Epub 2020 May 1.
8
Examining the Social Organization Practices of Cybercriminals in the Netherlands Online and Offline.审视荷兰网络犯罪分子在网络和线下的社会组织实践。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2020 Apr;64(5):522-538. doi: 10.1177/0306624X19895886. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
9
Credulity rather than general trust may increase vulnerability to fraud in older adults: a moderated mediation model.轻信而非普遍信任可能会增加老年人易受欺诈的脆弱性:一个有调节的中介模型。
J Elder Abuse Negl. 2019 Mar-May;31(2):146-162. doi: 10.1080/08946566.2018.1564105. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
10
Uncovering Susceptibility Risk to Online Deception in Aging.揭示老龄化人群在网络欺骗中的易感性风险
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Feb 14;75(3):522-533. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gby036.