Liougas Madalena Pamela, Fortino Adriana, Brozowski Kari, McMurray Josephine
University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 28;15(1):e088439. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088439.
Creating age-friendly cities (AFCs) is essential for supporting older adults' well-being. The WHO's 2007 guide outlines key features of AFCs, including social inclusion. Despite increasing numbers of AFC programmes, diverse experiences of ageing are often overlooked. This scoping review explores innovative programmes implemented by AFCs to enhance social inclusion for older adults.
A scoping review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines.
Systematic searches were conducted between December 2023 and January 2024 across relevant databases (Ovid Medline, OVID Embase, OVID PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Scopus) and the grey literature.
Selection criteria included English language publications describing evaluated age-friendly, social inclusion programmes for older adults.
Data extraction followed Gonyea and Hudson's (2015) framework assessing programmes on population, environment and/or sector inclusion levels. Inductive analysis identified and evaluated aspects of social inclusion.
We identified 20 peer-reviewed publications and 18 grey literature sources. Most programmes (peer review, n=19, 95.0%; grey, n=18, 100.0%) addressed population inclusion, incorporated environment (peer review, n=10, 50.0%; grey, n=15, 83.3%) and/or sector inclusion (peer review, n=7, 35.0%; grey, n=15, 83.3%). Key outcomes included an improved sense of belonging, increased engagement with community resources and activities, enhanced digital literacy and connectivity, and a reduction in feelings of loneliness and isolation. A notable gap was the absence of studies focused on Indigenous populations.
We highlight that programmes addressing population, environment and sectoral inclusion may improve the well-being of older adults in urban settings. Our findings will inform AFC practices and policies by deepening our understanding of how social inclusion can be improved for older adults, including those from under-represented groups, ensuring an equitable approach to enhancing quality of life.
创建对老年人友好的城市(AFCs)对于支持老年人的福祉至关重要。世界卫生组织2007年的指南概述了对老年人友好城市的关键特征,包括社会包容。尽管对老年人友好城市项目的数量不断增加,但不同的老龄化经历往往被忽视。本范围综述探讨了对老年人友好城市实施的创新项目,以加强老年人的社会包容。
遵循系统评价和Meta分析扩展的首选报告项目范围综述指南进行范围综述。
2023年12月至2024年1月期间,在相关数据库(Ovid Medline、OVID Embase、OVID PsycINFO、CINAHL、Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆和Scopus)以及灰色文献中进行了系统检索。
选择标准包括描述经评估的对老年人友好的社会包容项目的英文出版物。
数据提取遵循Gonyea和Hudson(2015年)的框架,该框架从人口、环境和/或部门包容水平方面评估项目。归纳分析确定并评估了社会包容的各个方面。
我们确定了20篇同行评审出版物和18个灰色文献来源。大多数项目(同行评审,n = 19,95.0%;灰色文献,n = 18,100.0%)涉及人口包容,纳入了环境(同行评审,n = 10,50.0%;灰色文献,n = 15,83.3%)和/或部门包容(同行评审,n = 7,35.0%;灰色文献,n = 15,83.3%)。关键成果包括归属感增强、与社区资源和活动的参与度提高、数字素养和连接性增强,以及孤独感和孤立感减少。一个明显的差距是缺乏针对原住民群体的研究。
我们强调,解决人口、环境和部门包容问题的项目可能会改善城市环境中老年人的福祉。我们的研究结果将通过加深我们对如何改善老年人(包括代表性不足群体的老年人)的社会包容的理解,为对老年人友好城市的实践和政策提供信息,确保采取公平的方法来提高生活质量。