Seers Kate, Nichols Vivien P, Bruce Julie, Ennis Stuart, Heine Peter, Patel Shilpa, Sandhu Harbinder Kaur, Underwood Martin, McGregor Gordon
Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK
Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 29;15(1):e085950. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085950.
This qualitative evaluation was embedded in the Rehabilitation Exercise and psycholoGical support After COVID-19 InfectioN (REGAIN) study, a randomised controlled trial (RCT) for those with post-COVID-19 condition ('long COVID') after hospital admission for COVID-19, comparing weekly home-based, live online supervised group exercise and psychological support sessions with 'best practice usual care' (a single session of advice).
To increase our understanding of how and why the REGAIN programme might have worked and what helped or hindered this intervention.
A qualitative evaluation which utilised interviews with participants and practitioners delivering the intervention. Framework and thematic analysis were used to analyse the findings.
England and Wales, UK.
Adults discharged from National Health Service (NHS) hospitals at least 3 months previously after COVID-19, with ongoing physical and/or mental health sequelae.
Twenty intervention participants, 20 control participants and five practitioners were interviewed.The themes from the group support sessions were: (1) you are not alone; (2) sharing experiences and addressing worries; (3) gaining new perspectives; (4) hope for progression; (5) peer support and bonding; (6) integration of facilitation skills; (7) modified activity pacing and goal setting, and (8) giving participants structure. The themes from group exercise were: (1) monitoring and modification of the online exercise; (2) catering for differing abilities; (3) feeling safe and confident to exercise; (4) progression of fitness; (5) optimal timing in the recovery trajectory; (6) group effect; (7) initial apprehension about exercise group; (8) gauging exercise capabilities; (9) translating exercises into life; and (10) on-demand supplementary videos. The 1:1 consultation sessions revealed patients needed to tell their stories.
Being listened to and being understood by someone 'who got it' was very important to people with post-COVID-19 condition. The group sessions of both exercise and psychological support were valued by participants, working together, and learning from each other in the face of a new disease within a global pandemic.
这项定性评估纳入了新冠感染后康复锻炼与心理支持(REGAIN)研究,这是一项针对新冠病毒感染住院后出现新冠后遗症(“长新冠”)患者的随机对照试验(RCT),将每周一次的居家、在线实时监督的小组锻炼和心理支持课程与“最佳实践常规护理”(单次建议)进行比较。
加深我们对REGAIN项目如何以及为何可能起作用,以及哪些因素有助于或阻碍该干预措施的理解。
一项定性评估,采用对参与者和实施干预的从业者进行访谈的方式。运用框架分析和主题分析来分析研究结果。
英国英格兰和威尔士。
至少在3个月前从国民保健服务(NHS)医院出院的成年人,患有持续的身体和/或心理健康后遗症,且感染过新冠病毒。
对20名干预组参与者、20名对照组参与者和5名从业者进行了访谈。小组支持课程的主题包括:(1)你并不孤单;(2)分享经历和解决担忧;(3)获得新视角;(4)对进展的希望;(5)同伴支持与联系;(6)促进技能的整合;(7)调整活动节奏和设定目标,以及(8)为参与者提供结构。小组锻炼的主题包括:(1)在线锻炼的监测与调整;(2)适应不同能力;(3)感到安全且有信心锻炼;(4)体能的进步;(5)康复轨迹中的最佳时机;(6)群体效应;(7)对锻炼小组的最初担忧;(8)评估锻炼能力;(9)将锻炼转化为生活;以及(10)按需提供补充视频。一对一咨询环节表明患者需要讲述他们的故事。
对于患有新冠后遗症的人来说,被“感同身受”的人倾听和理解非常重要。锻炼和心理支持的小组课程受到参与者的重视,他们在全球大流行背景下面对一种新疾病时共同努力并相互学习。