文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

个性化是成功的核心:对 LISTEN 随机对照试验的过程评估,该试验评估了针对长新冠患者的个性化自我管理支持干预措施。

Personalisation at the Core of Success: Process Evaluation of the LISTEN Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating a Personalised Self-Management Support Intervention for People Living With Long Covid.

作者信息

Leggat Fiona, Torrens-Burton Anna, Sewell Bernadette, Sevdalis Nick, Busse Monica, Domeney Anne, Parsons Judith, Abreu Maria Ines de Sousa de, Jones Fiona

机构信息

Population Health Research Institute, School of Health and Medical Sciences, City St George's, University of London, London, UK.

PRIME Centre Wales, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70270. doi: 10.1111/hex.70270.


DOI:10.1111/hex.70270
PMID:40320865
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12050411/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The development and evaluation of rehabilitation interventions designed to support people with Long Covid (LC) remains an important ongoing priority. Many people with LC experience episodic, debilitating symptoms that can reduce their ability to engage in all areas of activity. The Long CovId personalised Self-managemenT support co-design and EvaluatioN (LISTEN) trial co-designed and evaluated a personalised self-management support intervention to build confidence and support people to live better with LC. This paper describes the context, implementation, mechanisms of impact and impacts from the LISTEN intervention, in comparison with usual LC services accessed within the National Health Service (NHS). METHODS: A mixed methods process evaluation was nested within the LISTEN pragmatic, multi-site, randomised controlled trial. Data were collected from sites in England and Wales between September 2022 and January 2024. Observations and focus groups with healthcare practitioners (HCPs) delivering the intervention were conducted to assess fidelity. Standardised implementation measures, focussed on intervention feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness, were gathered from HCPs and intervention participants. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with a subset of participants across both trial arms. Data were analysed independently using descriptive statistics, or reflexive thematic analyses, and subsequently integrated, drawing upon the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research v2. FINDINGS: Thirty-six HCPs participated in the process evaluation, and 197 intervention participants completed standardised implementation measures. Across both trial arms, 49 participants took part in semi-structured interviews. Six integrated themes were constructed from all data sources describing and illustrating links between the context, implementation, mechanisms of impact and impacts: 'Delivery during uncertainty and ambiguity', 'Diversity and consistency of usual care', 'Drivers for self-care and the impact of self-generated expertise', 'Appropriate if unexpected support', 'Personalisation at the core of success' and 'A spectrum of change'. CONCLUSION: The LISTEN intervention is an appropriate, feasible intervention for participants and HCPs. The intervention can be delivered to a high level of fidelity following training and with ongoing HCP support. Access, receipt and perceptions of NHS LC services were variable. Personalised, relational interventions, such as LISTEN, can foster favourable impacts on confidence, knowledge and activity and are acceptable and strongly recommended within LC rehabilitation services. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The study was supported by a patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) group from project conception to study end. Using their lived expertise, seven people with LC supported accessible recruitment (e.g., materials), data collection (e.g., topic guides), data interpretation (e.g., theme construction and reviewing findings) and dissemination activities (e.g., online webinars). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN36407216, registered 27/01/2022.

摘要

背景:旨在支持长新冠患者的康复干预措施的开发和评估仍然是当前一项重要的优先工作。许多长新冠患者会经历间歇性的、使人衰弱的症状,这可能会降低他们参与各个活动领域的能力。长新冠个性化自我管理支持共同设计与评估(LISTEN)试验共同设计并评估了一种个性化自我管理支持干预措施,以增强信心并帮助人们更好地应对长新冠。本文描述了LISTEN干预措施的背景、实施情况、影响机制以及与英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)内常规长新冠服务相比所产生的影响。 方法:一项混合方法过程评估嵌套在LISTEN实用、多中心、随机对照试验中。2022年9月至2024年1月期间从英格兰和威尔士的研究点收集数据。对实施干预的医疗保健从业者(HCPs)进行观察和焦点小组讨论,以评估干预的保真度。从HCPs和干预参与者那里收集了侧重于干预可行性、可接受性和适宜性的标准化实施措施。对两个试验组的一部分参与者进行了半结构化访谈。使用描述性统计或反思性主题分析对数据进行独立分析,随后根据实施研究综合框架第2版进行整合。 结果:36名HCPs参与了过程评估,197名干预参与者完成了标准化实施措施。在两个试验组中,49名参与者参加了半结构化访谈。从所有数据源构建了六个综合主题,描述并说明了背景、实施、影响机制和影响之间的联系:“在不确定性和模糊性中实施”、“常规护理的多样性和一致性”、“自我护理的驱动因素以及自我产生的专业知识的影响”、“意外支持时的适宜性”、“成功的核心是个性化”以及“一系列变化”。 结论:LISTEN干预措施对参与者和HCPs来说是一种适宜、可行的干预措施。经过培训并在HCPs的持续支持下,该干预措施能够以较高的保真度实施。NHS长新冠服务的可及性、接受情况和认知存在差异。像LISTEN这样的个性化、关系型干预措施可以对信心、知识和活动产生积极影响,在长新冠康复服务中是可接受的,强烈推荐使用。 患者或公众参与:该研究从项目构思到研究结束均得到了患者和公众参与及介入(PPIE)小组的支持。七名长新冠患者利用他们的实际经验,支持了可及性招募(例如材料)、数据收集(例如主题指南)、数据解读(例如主题构建和审查结果)以及传播活动(例如在线网络研讨会)。 试验注册:ISRCTN36407216,于2022年1月27日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c265/12050411/bfd294ee04cb/HEX-28-e70270-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c265/12050411/d9cf99589f45/HEX-28-e70270-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c265/12050411/740ecc1c8deb/HEX-28-e70270-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c265/12050411/5456f3fc5202/HEX-28-e70270-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c265/12050411/69c49b8c56eb/HEX-28-e70270-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c265/12050411/c179e44c111d/HEX-28-e70270-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c265/12050411/bfd294ee04cb/HEX-28-e70270-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c265/12050411/d9cf99589f45/HEX-28-e70270-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c265/12050411/740ecc1c8deb/HEX-28-e70270-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c265/12050411/5456f3fc5202/HEX-28-e70270-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c265/12050411/69c49b8c56eb/HEX-28-e70270-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c265/12050411/c179e44c111d/HEX-28-e70270-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c265/12050411/bfd294ee04cb/HEX-28-e70270-g004.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Personalisation at the Core of Success: Process Evaluation of the LISTEN Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating a Personalised Self-Management Support Intervention for People Living With Long Covid.

Health Expect. 2025-6

[2]
Using co-design methods to develop new personalised support for people living with Long Covid: The 'LISTEN' intervention.

Health Expect. 2024-6

[3]
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a personalised self-management intervention for living with long COVID: protocol for the LISTEN randomised controlled trial.

Trials. 2023-2-1

[4]
Effectiveness of a personalised self-management intervention for people living with long covid (Listen trial): pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group, randomised controlled trial.

BMJ Med. 2025-1-31

[5]
Co-designing personalised self-management support for people living with long Covid: The LISTEN protocol.

PLoS One. 2022

[6]
Health screening clinic to reduce absenteeism and presenteeism among NHS Staff: eTHOS a pilot RCT.

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024-8

[7]
An exploration of the experiences and self-generated strategies used when navigating everyday life with Long Covid.

BMC Public Health. 2024-3-13

[8]
Interpersonal counselling for adolescent depression delivered by youth mental health workers without core professional training: the ICALM feasibility RCT.

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024-12

[9]
MulTI-domain self-management in older People wiTh OstEoarthritis and multi-morbidities: protocol for the TIPTOE randomised controlled trial.

Trials. 2024-8-23

[10]
Guided self-help for depression in autistic adults: the ADEPT feasibility RCT.

Health Technol Assess. 2019-12

本文引用的文献

[1]
Effectiveness of a personalised self-management intervention for people living with long covid (Listen trial): pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group, randomised controlled trial.

BMJ Med. 2025-1-31

[2]
Long COVID: a clinical update.

Lancet. 2024-8-17

[3]
Working knowledge, uncertainty and ontological politics: An ethnography of UK long covid clinics.

Sociol Health Illn. 2024-11

[4]
Using co-design methods to develop new personalised support for people living with Long Covid: The 'LISTEN' intervention.

Health Expect. 2024-6

[5]
What is current care for people with Long COVID in England? A qualitative interview study.

BMJ Open. 2024-5-16

[6]
What is quality in long covid care? Lessons from a national quality improvement collaborative and multi-site ethnography.

BMC Med. 2024-4-15

[7]
Accessing care for Long Covid from the perspectives of patients and healthcare practitioners: A qualitative study.

Health Expect. 2024-4

[8]
An exploration of the experiences and self-generated strategies used when navigating everyday life with Long Covid.

BMC Public Health. 2024-3-13

[9]
Clinical effectiveness of an online supervised group physical and mental health rehabilitation programme for adults with post-covid-19 condition (REGAIN study): multicentre randomised controlled trial.

BMJ. 2024-2-7

[10]
Impact of Long COVID on productivity and informal caregiving.

Eur J Health Econ. 2024-9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索