Wang Huan, Gao Chuang, Guignard-Duff Magalie, Cole Christian, Hall Christopher, Baruah Resham, Das Shikta, Gao He, Mamza Jil Billy, Lang Chim C, Mordi Ify R
Division of Population Health & Genomics, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Health Informatics Centre, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Heart. 2025 May 12;111(11):523-531. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324160.
Early heart failure (HF) diagnosis is crucial to ensure that optimal guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is administered to reduce morbidity and mortality. Limited access to echocardiography could lead to a later diagnosis for patients, for example, during an HF hospitalisation (hHF). This study aimed to compare the incidence and outcomes of inpatient versus outpatient diagnosis of HF.
Electronic health records were linked to echocardiography data between 2015 and 2021 from patients in Tayside, Scotland (population~450 000). Incident HF diagnosis was classified into inpatient or outpatient and stratified by ejection fraction (EF). A non-HF comparator group with normal left ventricular function was also defined. The primary outcome was time to cardiovascular death or hHF within 12 months of diagnosis.
In total, 5223 individuals were identified, 4231 with HF (1115 heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 666 heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction, 1402 heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and 1048 HF with unknown EF) and 992 with non-HF comparators. Of the 4231 HF patients, 2169 (51.3%) were diagnosed as inpatients. The primary outcome was observed in 1193 individuals with HF (28.1%) and 32 (3.2%) non-HF comparators and was significantly more likely to occur in individuals diagnosed as inpatients than outpatients (809 vs 384 events; adjusted HR: 1.62 (1.39-1.89), p<0.001), and this was consistent regardless of EF. For HFrEF patients first diagnosed as inpatients, those discharged on ≥2 GDMT had a reduced incidence of the primary outcome compared with those discharged on <2 GDMT (303 vs 175 events; adjusted HR: 0.72 (0.55-0.94), p=0.016).
Individuals whose first presentation was a HF hospitalisation had a significantly worse outcome than those who were diagnosed in the community. Among hospitalised individuals, higher use of GDMT was associated with improved outcomes. Our results highlight the importance of improving diagnostic pathways to allow for earlier identification and treatment of HF.
早期心力衰竭(HF)诊断对于确保给予最佳的指南导向药物治疗(GDMT)以降低发病率和死亡率至关重要。例如,在心力衰竭住院治疗(hHF)期间,超声心动图检查受限可能导致患者诊断延迟。本研究旨在比较心力衰竭住院诊断与门诊诊断的发生率及预后。
将2015年至2021年期间苏格兰泰赛德地区(人口约45万)患者的电子健康记录与超声心动图数据相链接。新发心力衰竭诊断分为住院诊断或门诊诊断,并按射血分数(EF)分层。还定义了一个左心室功能正常的非心力衰竭对照组。主要结局是诊断后12个月内心血管死亡或心力衰竭住院治疗的时间。
共识别出5223例个体,其中4231例患有心力衰竭(1115例射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)、666例射血分数轻度降低的心力衰竭、1402例射血分数保留的心力衰竭和1048例射血分数未知的心力衰竭),992例为非心力衰竭对照组。在4231例心力衰竭患者中,2169例(51.3%)为住院诊断。1193例心力衰竭患者(28.1%)和32例(3.2%)非心力衰竭对照组出现了主要结局,且住院诊断的个体比门诊诊断的个体更易发生主要结局(809例对384例事件;调整后HR:1.62(1.39 - 1.89),p<0.001),无论射血分数如何均如此。对于首次住院诊断为HFrEF的患者,出院时接受≥2种GDMT治疗的患者与接受<2种GDMT治疗的患者相比,主要结局的发生率较低(303例对175例事件;调整后HR:0.72(0.55 - 0.94),p = 0.016)。
首次表现为心力衰竭住院治疗的个体的预后明显比在社区诊断的个体差。在住院个体中,更高频率使用GDMT与更好的预后相关。我们的结果强调了改善诊断途径以实现心力衰竭早期识别和治疗的重要性。