Ngo M, Thorburn K, Naama A, Skelton E
City St Georges, University of London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, United Kingdom.
City St Georges, University of London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, United Kingdom.
Radiography (Lond). 2025 Mar;31(2):102871. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2025.01.006. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
The demand for diagnostic imaging in emergency clinical settings has increased in recent years, placing pressure on the available workforce. However, challenges including staff shortages and inflexible shift patterns may prompt radiographers to leave emergency settings. This study explores the lived experiences of radiographers who have transitioned to non-emergency settings and factors that might influence their decision to return.
A descriptive phenomenological approach was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 diagnostic radiographers working in the UK, who had transitioned to non-emergency settings within the last one to five years.
Participants provided insight into (1) the past: reasons for transitioning, (2) the present: current thoughts on wellbeing and professional development, and (3) the future: possibility of returning to the emergency setting. Occupational pressures including excessive workloads, physical exhaustion, and time constraints leading to moral distress, were commonly cited reasons for transitioning to non-emergency setting. Since transitioning, participants reported improvement in their physical and mental well-being, renewed job satisfaction, and enhanced work-life balance. Career advancement opportunities, a better work environment, competitive salaries, and improved mental health support, could encourage a return to the emergency setting.
This study highlights the valuable learning experiences that emergency settings offer diagnostic radiographers, greatly enhancing their skills and overall competence. However, challenging work conditions can lead to job dissatisfaction and burn out. Instead of leaving the profession altogether, some radiographers found renewed satisfaction by transitioning to non-emergency settings. The majority of participants would consider returning to emergency imaging under the right conditions.
Flexibility regarding work arrangements, career advancement opportunities, competitive salary offers, and improved mental health support through interventions such as debriefing, could help retain radiographers in emergency settings.
近年来,急诊临床环境中对诊断成像的需求有所增加,给现有的工作人员带来了压力。然而,包括人员短缺和僵化的轮班模式在内的挑战可能会促使放射技师离开急诊环境。本研究探讨了已过渡到非急诊环境的放射技师的生活经历以及可能影响他们决定返回的因素。
采用描述性现象学方法。对12名在英国工作的诊断放射技师进行了半结构化访谈,他们在过去一至五年内已过渡到非急诊环境。
参与者深入探讨了(1)过去:过渡的原因,(2)现在:对幸福感和职业发展的当前想法,以及(3)未来:返回急诊环境的可能性。职业压力,包括工作量过大、身体疲惫和导致道德困扰的时间限制,是过渡到非急诊环境的常见原因。自过渡以来,参与者报告说他们的身心健康有所改善,工作满意度重新提高,工作与生活的平衡得到增强。职业发展机会、更好的工作环境、有竞争力的薪资以及改善的心理健康支持,可能会促使他们返回急诊环境。
本研究强调了急诊环境为诊断放射技师提供的宝贵学习经验,极大地提高了他们的技能和整体能力。然而,具有挑战性的工作条件可能导致工作不满和倦怠。一些放射技师没有完全离开这个职业,而是通过过渡到非急诊环境重新找到了满足感。大多数参与者会考虑在合适的条件下返回急诊成像工作。
在工作安排方面的灵活性、职业发展机会、有竞争力的薪资待遇,以及通过汇报等干预措施改善心理健康支持,有助于留住急诊环境中的放射技师。