Korsunsky Sydney, Tannenbaum Stacey L, Cook Isabella, Rodwell Megan, Shachner Mark S
Department of Surgery, Broward Health Medical Center, 1600 S Andrews Ave, Fort Lauderdale, FL, 33316, USA.
Nova Southeastern University College of Osteopathic Medicine, 3200 S University Dr, Davie, FL, 33328, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1996-2003. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11572-0. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
Decisions made for anti-reflux surgery can be guided by both EndoFLIP™ measurement of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) distensibility index (DI) and esophageal manometric measurement of lower esophageal function, but the exact nature of their relationship to one another is unknown despite serving similar purposes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between pre-operative LES basal mean pressure with esophageal manometry and intraoperative gastroesophageal DI using EndoFLIP™ following crural dissection to aid in informing surgeons' decision-making during anti-reflux surgery.
A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease who underwent preoperative esophageal manometry evaluation and anti-reflux surgery with EndoFLIP™ intraoperatively between December 2020 and January 2024. Data collected included LES basal mean pressure from manometry and the logarithm of intraoperative EndoFLIP™ DI. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and independent sample t-tests.
A total of 147 patients were included in the study. Mean LES basal pressure was 20.3, and median DI after crural dissection was 4.6. There was a significant but weak to non-existent inverse correlation between LES basal mean pressure following crural dissection and logDI (r = - 0.243, p = 0.005). Mean LES pressures were compared with findings of significant differences at DI 5, 5.5, 6, 6,5, 7, 7.5, and 8 (p < 0.05 for all), thus, none of the analyzed DI cut-points could definitively be used to inform operative decision-making.
There is a significant but weak or non-existent inverse relationship between LES basal mean pressure measured on manometry and DI following crural dissection during anti-reflux surgery, but no specific DI can determine best fundoplication type of surgery based on LES pressures. Surgeons should take advantage of the distinct information gleaned from both manometry and EndoFLIP™, when possible, when planning and performing anti-reflux surgery.
抗反流手术的决策可通过食管下括约肌(LES)扩张性指数(DI)的EndoFLIP™测量以及食管下功能的食管测压来指导,但尽管它们目的相似,其相互之间的确切关系尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估术前LES基础平均压力与食管测压以及术中使用EndoFLIP™测量的胃食管DI之间的关系,以帮助外科医生在抗反流手术中做出决策。
对2020年12月至2024年1月期间接受术前食管测压评估并在术中使用EndoFLIP™进行抗反流手术的胃食管反流病患者进行回顾性病历审查。收集的数据包括测压所得的LES基础平均压力以及术中EndoFLIP™ DI的对数。数据分析包括描述性统计、Pearson相关系数和独立样本t检验。
本研究共纳入147例患者。LES基础平均压力为20.3,膈脚分离术后DI的中位数为4.6。膈脚分离术后LES基础平均压力与logDI之间存在显著但较弱至不存在的负相关(r = -0.243,p = 0.005)。将平均LES压力与DI为5、5.5、6、6.5、7、7.5和8时的显著差异结果进行比较(所有p值均<0.05),因此,所分析的DI切点均不能明确用于指导手术决策。
在抗反流手术中,测压测得的LES基础平均压力与膈脚分离术后的DI之间存在显著但较弱或不存在的负相关,但没有特定的DI能够根据LES压力确定最佳的胃底折叠术式。外科医生在计划和进行抗反流手术时,应尽可能利用从测压和EndoFLIP™中获取的不同信息。