• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
State-Mandated Ethics Oversight Is Inappropriate for Gender-Affirming Care.国家规定的伦理监督不适用于性别肯定治疗。
J Law Med Ethics. 2024;52(4):950-952. doi: 10.1017/jme.2024.170. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
2
Who Decides? State Bans on Gender-Affirming Care for Minors in Tension with Parental Rights and Equal Protection Under the Law.谁来做决定?州政府对未成年人性别认同医疗护理的禁令与父母权利及法律平等保护相冲突。
J Leg Med. 2023 Jan-Jun;43(1-2):35-51. doi: 10.1080/01947648.2024.2349673. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
3
Values and Evidence in Gender-Affirming Care.性别肯定护理中的价值观和证据。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2024 May;54(3):51-53. doi: 10.1002/hast.1592.
4
A scoping review of the ethical issues in gender-affirming care for transgender and gender-diverse individuals.对跨性别者和性别多样化者性别肯定治疗中的伦理问题的范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Apr 30;26(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01216-2.
5
United States Health Policies on Gender-Affirming Care in 2022.2022 年美国关于性别肯定护理的卫生政策。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Feb 1;153(2):462e-473e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010594. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
6
Splitting Equality: Access to Gender-Affirming Care in the Fourth Circuit.平等分割:美国第四巡回上诉法院的性别确认治疗机会
J Law Health. 2025;38(3):402-421.
7
Troubling Trends in Health Misinformation Related to Gender-Affirming Care.与性别肯定护理相关的健康错误信息的令人不安的趋势。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2024 May;54(3):53-55. doi: 10.1002/hast.1590.
8
Which U.S. States' Medicaid Programs Provide Coverage for Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy and Gender-Affirming Genital Surgery for Transgender Patients?: A State-by-State Review, and a Study Detailing the Patient Experience to Confirm Coverage of Services.美国哪些州的医疗补助计划为跨性别患者提供性别肯定激素治疗和性别肯定生殖器手术的覆盖范围?一项州与州之间的审查,以及一项详细说明患者体验以确认服务覆盖范围的研究。
J Sex Med. 2021 Feb;18(2):410-422. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.11.016. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
9
Medical Consensus on Gender Affirming Care's Critical Impact on Incarcerated Black Transgender Women.医学专家就性别肯定护理对被监禁的黑人跨性别女性的重大影响达成共识。
J Law Health. 2024;38(1):66-101.
10
Gender-affirming care education in pharmacy: a scoping review protocol of practices in Canada and the USA.药学领域的性别肯定护理教育:加拿大和美国实践的范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):e086927. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086927.

本文引用的文献

1
Regret after Gender-affirmation Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prevalence.性别确认手术后的遗憾:患病率的系统评价和荟萃分析
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Mar 19;9(3):e3477. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003477. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
The Role of the Ethicist in an Interdisciplinary Transgender Health Care Team.伦理学家在跨学科跨性别医疗团队中的角色。
Transgend Health. 2019 Apr 26;4(1):136-142. doi: 10.1089/trgh.2018.0058. eCollection 2019.
3
Informed Consent in Decision-Making in Pediatric Practice.知情同意在儿科实践中的决策制定。
Pediatrics. 2016 Aug;138(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1485.
4
Transplant Ethics: Let's Begin the Conversation Anew : A Critical Look at One Institute's Experience with Transplant Related Ethical Issues.
HEC Forum. 2016 Jun;28(2):141-52. doi: 10.1007/s10730-015-9285-5.
5
The goals of ethics consultation: rejecting the role of "ethics police".伦理咨询的目标:摒弃“伦理警察”的角色。
Am J Bioeth. 2007 Feb;7(2):42-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160601109515.

国家规定的伦理监督不适用于性别肯定治疗。

State-Mandated Ethics Oversight Is Inappropriate for Gender-Affirming Care.

作者信息

Mabel Hilary, Guidry-Grimes Laura, Sankary Lauren R

机构信息

CENTER FOR ETHICS, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, EMORY UNIVERSITY, ATLANTA, GA, USA.

CENTER FOR BIOETHICS, CLEVELAND CLINIC, CLEVELAND, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Law Med Ethics. 2024;52(4):950-952. doi: 10.1017/jme.2024.170. Epub 2025 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1017/jme.2024.170
PMID:39885746
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11788663/
Abstract

A proposed state administrative rule would have required medical ethicists to approve certain aspects of gender-affirming care. The authors argue the proposed rule lacked appropriate justification compared to other instances of state-mandated ethics oversight and would undermine trust, raise practical challenges, and send harmful messages to society, patients, and providers.

摘要

一项拟议的州行政规定本会要求医学伦理学家批准性别确认护理的某些方面。作者们认为,与州强制规定的伦理监督的其他情况相比,该拟议规定缺乏适当的正当理由,会破坏信任、引发实际挑战,并向社会、患者和医疗服务提供者传递有害信息。