• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患有转移性癌症的创伤患者接受急诊手术:一项匹配队列分析。

Trauma patients with metastatic cancer undergoing emergent surgery: A matched cohort analysis.

作者信息

Nguyen Matthew, Nahmias Jeffry, Eng Oliver S, Senthil Maheswari, Barrios Cristobal, Dolich Matthew, Lekawa Michael, Grigorian Areg

机构信息

University of California, Irvine, Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Orange, CA, USA.

University of California, Irvine, Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Orange, CA, USA.

出版信息

Surg Open Sci. 2024 Jul 17;20:184-188. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.07.005. eCollection 2024 Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.sopen.2024.07.005
PMID:39886065
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11780370/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of literature guiding trauma surgeons in the care of patients with active metastatic cancer (MC). Even less is known regarding outcomes for MC patients requiring emergent surgery after trauma. We hypothesized that trauma patients with active Metastatic Cancer (MC) have an increased mortality rate and undergo increased rates of withdrawal of care (WoC) within 72-hours following emergent operations, compared to similarly matched patients without MC.

METHODS

Patients with active MC at the time of traumatic injury were matched 1:2 against patients without active MC based on demographics, comorbidities, vital signs on admission, and injury profile.

RESULTS

From 43,826 patients, 0.2 % had MC. After matching 39 MC patients to 78 without MC, there was no difference in demographics, comorbidities, injury severity score, mechanism of injury, vitals on admission (blood pressure, heart rate, respiration rate) and need for blood transfusion (all  > 0.05). Compared to patients without MC, patients with MC had higher rates and associated risk of death during index hospitalization (38.5 % vs. 15.2 %,  = 0.005; OR 3.49, CI 1.43-8.51,  = 0.006), as well as a higher rate and associated risk of WoC within 72-hours (12.8 % vs. 1.3 %,  = 0.007; OR 11.47, CI 1.29-101.93,  = 0.029).

CONCLUSION

Trauma patients with MC requiring emergent thoracic or abdominal surgery have a high risk of death and an over ten-fold higher associated risk for WoC within the first three days. In some cases, palliative care consultation should be considered, and counseling should be offered to this high-risk trauma population to enable individualized and patient-centric decisions.

KEY MESSAGE

This research highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary team consisting of trauma surgeons, oncologist, and palliative care physicians in caring for the high-risk trauma patients with disseminated cancer requiring urgent surgery.

摘要

背景

指导创伤外科医生治疗活动性转移性癌症(MC)患者的文献较少。对于创伤后需要急诊手术的MC患者的预后了解更少。我们假设,与无MC的匹配患者相比,患有活动性转移性癌症(MC)的创伤患者在急诊手术后72小时内死亡率增加,且护理撤减(WoC)率升高。

方法

根据人口统计学、合并症、入院时生命体征和损伤情况,将创伤时患有活动性MC的患者与无活动性MC的患者按1:2进行匹配。

结果

在43826例患者中,0.2%患有MC。将39例MC患者与78例无MC患者匹配后,在人口统计学、合并症、损伤严重程度评分、损伤机制、入院时生命体征(血压、心率、呼吸频率)和输血需求方面均无差异(均>0.05)。与无MC的患者相比,MC患者在首次住院期间的死亡率更高且相关风险更高(38.5%对15.2%,P=0.005;OR 3.49,CI 1.43 - 8.51,P=0.006),以及在72小时内的WoC率更高且相关风险更高(12.8%对1.3%,P=0.007;OR 11.47,CI 1.29 - 101.93,P=0.029)。

结论

需要急诊胸腹部手术的MC创伤患者死亡风险高,且在前三天内WoC的相关风险高出十倍以上。在某些情况下,应考虑姑息治疗会诊,并为这一高风险创伤人群提供咨询,以做出个性化的、以患者为中心的决策。

关键信息

本研究强调了由创伤外科医生、肿瘤学家和姑息治疗医生组成的多学科团队在护理需要紧急手术的播散性癌症高风险创伤患者中的重要性。

相似文献

1
Trauma patients with metastatic cancer undergoing emergent surgery: A matched cohort analysis.患有转移性癌症的创伤患者接受急诊手术:一项匹配队列分析。
Surg Open Sci. 2024 Jul 17;20:184-188. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.07.005. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Palliative Care Consultations in Trauma Patients and Role of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: Propensity-Matched Study.创伤患者的姑息治疗咨询和不复苏医嘱的作用:倾向匹配研究。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2020 Dec;37(12):1068-1075. doi: 10.1177/1049909120919672. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
3
Nationwide Analysis of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in Civilian Trauma.全国范围内民用创伤患者主动脉抢救性血管内球囊阻断分析。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Jun 1;154(6):500-508. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0096.
4
Outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with concomitant blunt thoracic aortic injury and traumatic brain injury from the Aortic Trauma Foundation global registry.胸主动脉腔内修复术治疗合并钝性胸主动脉损伤和创伤性脑损伤患者的结果:来自主动脉创伤基金会全球注册中心的研究。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Mar;75(3):930-938. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.09.028. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
5
Vascular surgery is the most commonly consulted specialty for emergent operative trauma.血管外科是急诊手术创伤最常咨询的专科。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Jan;77(1):63-68.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.177. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
6
End-of-Life Decision-Making for Patients With Geriatric Trauma Cared for in a Trauma Intensive Care Unit.在创伤重症监护病房接受治疗的老年创伤患者的临终决策
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Aug;35(8):1063-1068. doi: 10.1177/1049909117752670. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
7
Morbidity or mortality? Variations in trauma centres in the rescue of older injured patients.发病率还是死亡率?创伤中心在救治老年创伤患者方面的差异。
Injury. 2016 May;47(5):1091-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.044. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
8
The importance of empiric abdominal computed tomography after urgent laparotomy for trauma: do they reveal unexpected injuries?急腹症剖腹术后经验性腹部 CT 的重要性:是否会揭示意外损伤?
Surgery. 2014 Oct;156(4):979-85. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.044.
9
Prehospital continuous vital signs predict need for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta and resuscitative thoracotomy prehospital continuous vital signs predict resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta.院前连续生命体征预测需要进行主动脉复苏性血管内球囊阻断术和复苏性开胸术。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Nov 1;91(5):798-802. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003171.
10
Platelet Transfusion and Outcomes After Massive Transfusion Protocol Activation for Major Trauma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.血小板输注与大创伤大量输血方案激活后的结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
Anesth Analg. 2022 Aug 1;135(2):385-393. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005982. Epub 2022 May 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2022.癌症统计数据,2022 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
2
Variation in the rates of emergency surgery amongst emergency admissions to hospital for common acute conditions.常见急症入院患者急诊手术率的变化。
BJS Open. 2021 Nov 9;5(6). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab094.
3
Trends in Diagnosis and Treatment of Metastatic Cancer in the United States.美国转移性癌症的诊断和治疗趋势。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2021 Nov 1;44(11):572-579. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000866.
4
Opportunities to Improve Palliative Care Delivery in Trauma Critical Illness.创伤危重症患者舒缓治疗提供机会的改善。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Jun;39(6):633-640. doi: 10.1177/10499091211042303. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
5
Study Estimates Older Adults' Cancer Deaths After Surgery.研究估计老年人手术后的癌症死亡情况。
JAMA. 2021 Jul 6;326(1):19. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.10484.
6
Assessment of mortality and performance status in critically ill cancer patients: A retrospective cohort study.评估危重症癌症患者的死亡率和体能状态:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 11;16(6):e0252771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252771. eCollection 2021.
7
Comparison of a trauma comorbidity index with other measures of comorbidities to estimate risk of trauma mortality.比较创伤合并症指数与其他合并症测量指标,以估计创伤死亡率的风险。
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;28(10):1150-1159. doi: 10.1111/acem.14270. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
8
Fatal Infections Among Cancer Patients: A Population-Based Study in the United States.癌症患者中的致命感染:一项基于美国人群的研究。
Infect Dis Ther. 2021 Jun;10(2):871-895. doi: 10.1007/s40121-021-00433-7. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
9
Global variation in postoperative mortality and complications after cancer surgery: a multicentre, prospective cohort study in 82 countries.全球癌症手术后死亡率和并发症的变化:82 个国家的多中心前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet. 2021 Jan 30;397(10272):387-397. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00001-5. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
10
Venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a population-based cohort study.癌症患者的静脉血栓栓塞症:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Blood. 2021 Apr 8;137(14):1959-1969. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020007338.