Suppr超能文献

用于经胫骨截肢患者的压配式骨锚定假体。

Press-Fit Bone-Anchored Prosthesis for Individuals with Transtibial Amputation.

作者信息

Frölke Jan Paul M, Atallah Robin, Leijendekkers Ruud

机构信息

Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

AOFE Clinics, Oosterbeek, The Netherlands.

出版信息

JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2024 May 22;14(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00006. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This video article describes the use of bone-anchored prostheses for patients with transtibial amputations, most often resulting from trauma, infection, or dysvascular disease. Large studies have shown that about half of all patients with a socket-suspended artificial limb experience limited mobility and limited prosthesis use because of socket-related problems. These problems occur at the socket-residual limb interface as a result of a painful and unstable connection, leading to an asymmetrical gait and subsequent pelvic and back pain. In almost all of these cases, a bone-anchored prosthesis may result in substantial improvements in mobility and quality of life.

DESCRIPTION

This technique is preferably performed in a single-stage procedure. Preoperative implant planning is imperative when designing the custom-made implant (BADAL X, OTN Implants). These images should be visible on screen in the operating room throughout the procedure to guide the surgeon. The patient is positioned with the knee on a silicone cushion. The planned soft-tissue resection is marked, after which the resection of all layers is performed, including large nerves and neuromas, with high cuts performed under traction. Exposure of the residual bone following revision osteotomy is carried out according to the design. The medullary canal is prepared and perpendicular cutting of the tibial and fibular remnant are performed, with the latter cut at a level 1 to 2 cm higher than the former. The intramedullary component is inserted under fluoroscopic guidance, after which the distal end of the tibia is prepared utilizing the typical drop shape. Two transverse locking screws are inserted with the standard "freehand" technique. The soft tissues are contoured and closed over the implant, after which the stoma is created and the dual cone is mounted. Finally, pressure bandages are applied, and postoperative imaging is performed. After the surgical procedure, most patients stay 1 or 2 nights in the hospital, depending on the magnitude of the surgery (e.g., bilateral implantation of a bone-anchored implant) and the patient's comorbidities.

ALTERNATIVES

Simultaneous major leg amputation and bone-anchored prosthesis implantation is not advocated as treatment. First, a rehabilitation program with a socket-suspended prosthesis should be completed before patients can apply for a bone-anchored prosthesis. After rehabilitation, satisfaction with a prosthetic socket may be adequate, thereby not indicating the need for a bone-anchored prosthesis. Contraindications for bone-anchored implant surgery include severe diabetes (with complications), severe bone deformity, immature bones, bone diseases (i.e., chronic infection or metastasis), current chemotherapy, severe vascular diseases, pain without a clear cause, obesity (body mass index >30 kg/m), and smoking.

RATIONALE

Approximately half of patients who undergo a major lower-limb amputation are able to utilize an artificial leg acceptably well with a socket-suspended prosthesis. However, the other half of patients experience limitations resulting in reduced prosthesis use, mobility, and quality of life. Limb-to-prosthesis energy transfer is poor because of the so-called "pseudojoint" (i.e., the soft-tissue interface), and gross mechanical malalignment is common. Furthermore, transtibial amputees may experience irritation from pistoning and suction at the residual limb-socket interface. These issues result in skin problems and difficulties with socket fit because of fluctuation in the size of the residual limb size, resulting in a decrease in overall satisfaction and confidence in mobility. An osseointegration implant creates a direct skeletal connection between the residual limb and artificial leg, in which energy transfer is optimal and mechanical alignment is radically improved.

EXPECTED OUTCOMES

In an unpublished prospective study performed at our center with a 5-year follow-up, a total of 21 patients with a transtibial amputation received a titanium tibial osseointegration implant (BADAL X, OTN Implants) with additional proximal transverse locking screw fixation for primary stability. Most patients were male (71%), had a traumatic amputation (67%), and underwent a 2-stage surgical procedure (64%). Prosthesis wearing time was measured with use of the Questionnaire for Persons with a Transfemoral Amputation (Q-TFA) Prosthetic Use Score (PUS), and health-related quality of life was measured using the Q-TFA Global Score (GS). Both measurements improved significantly comparing preoperative baseline values using a socket-suspended prosthesis to all follow-up moments after bone-anchored prosthesis treatment: Q-TFA PUS baseline 53, 6-month 90, 1-year 88, 2-years 91, 5-years 89; Q-TFA GS baseline 38, 6-month 71, 1-year 80, 2-year 77, 5-year 78. The third question of the Global Score was separately assessed. This question asks, "How would you summarize your overall situation as an amputee?" A clear tendency for improvement was observed as 43% stated their situation to be "extremely poor" or "poor" at baseline, while only 19% stated their situation to be "good" or "extremely good", which changed at 5-year follow-up to 6% stating the situation to be "poor" and 94% stating the situation to be "good" or "extremely good". An implant survival of 95.5% was achieved at 5-year follow-up. One individual experienced progressive septic implant loosening resulting in a through-knee amputation. The individual had undergone primary transtibial amputation due to dysvascular problems, and preoperative duplex ultrasonography had shown no signs of aortoiliac occlusive disease. However, repeat examination displayed dysvascular disease progression, with the patient admitting having refrained from nicotine cessation. No bone infection, periprosthetic fracture, intramedullary stem breakage, or aseptic loosening occurred. Nine individuals experienced 12 events of low-grade soft-tissue infections all successfully treated with oral antibiotics. Nine individuals also experienced 12 events of high-grade soft-tissue infections, successfully treated with oral antibiotics 8 times, and requiring parenteral antibiotics or surgical treatment in 1 and 3 cases, respectively. This resulted in an infection/implant-year used ratio of 0.24. Hypergranulation tissue and stoma tissue redundancy occurred 2 and 4 times, respectively. We concluded that the mid-term results of this type of treatment were acceptable, especially in patients with nonvascular amputations. Since 2020, we have performed the surgery using a single-stage procedure as the standard choice, based on cost and convenience factors, and the results seem to be no different from our previous 2-stage strategy (unpublished data).

IMPORTANT TIPS

Preoperative implant planning: the procedure should be guided by comprehensive surgical instructions and use a custom-made implant design, with the aim of performing the procedure in a single stage.Patient positioning and setup: a knee cushion support may be beneficial.Soft-tissue marking: plan the resection area liberally, and plan the stoma anterior to the surgical approach (if not possible, directly in the wound).Soft-tissue correction and exposure of residual bone: liberally resect soft-tissue redundancy.Revision osteotomy with guided shortening: utilize water-cooled power sawing.Medullary canal preparation and the perpendicular osteotomy plane: use fluoroscopy to guide drilling.Insertion of the intramedullary component: in case of little resistance, use bone morphogenetic protein-2 (InductOs; Medtronic) and bone impaction grafting for augmentation.Use transverse locking screws for primary stabilization of the implantSoft-tissue contouring and closure: do not close the muscle fascia over the implant.Aperture creation and dual-cone insertion: perform a 2-stage procedure only in cases with bone reconstruction, with the second stage performed after a 10 to 12-week interval.Bandage: leave the bandage applied for 48 hours.Postoperative imaging and follow-up: our institutional follow-up schedule is 6 months, then 1, 2, 5, and 10 years postoperatively.Introduction rehabilitation protocol: The standard program is 4 weeks and starts 3 weeks after a single-stage surgery. Patients may fully load the prosthesis at the start of the rehabilitation, provided the pain score does not exceed a 5 on a scale from 0 to 10.Rehabilitation: make videos to compare patient mobility at postoperative time points and to assess progression.Results and conclusions: implant loosening is rare, and soft-tissue infections typically occur often in the first 2 years and require nonoperative treatment.

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

BAP = bone-anchored prosthesisBMI = body mass indexCT = computed tomographyOTI = osseointegration tibia implantK-wire = Kirschner wireDCA = dual-cone adapterBIG = bone impaction grafting.

摘要

背景

本文视频介绍了骨锚式假肢在经胫骨截肢患者中的应用,这些患者大多因创伤、感染或血管疾病导致截肢。大型研究表明,约一半使用接受腔悬吊式假肢的患者由于与接受腔相关的问题,活动能力受限且假肢使用受限。这些问题发生在接受腔与残肢的界面处,是由于连接疼痛且不稳定,导致步态不对称以及随后的骨盆和背部疼痛。在几乎所有这些情况下,骨锚式假肢可能会显著改善患者的活动能力和生活质量。

描述

该技术最好在一期手术中进行。在设计定制植入物(BADAL X,OTN植入物)时,术前植入物规划至关重要。在整个手术过程中,这些图像应在手术室的屏幕上可见,以指导外科医生。患者膝盖置于硅胶垫上。标记计划的软组织切除范围,之后进行所有层次的切除,包括大神经和神经瘤,在牵引下进行高位切断。根据设计进行截骨术后残余骨的暴露。准备髓腔并对胫骨和腓骨残端进行垂直切割,后者的切割位置比前者高1至2厘米。在透视引导下插入髓内组件,之后利用典型的水滴形状准备胫骨远端。采用标准的“徒手”技术插入两枚横向锁定螺钉。对软组织进行塑形并覆盖在植入物上进行缝合,之后创建造口并安装双锥。最后,应用加压绷带,并进行术后成像。手术后,大多数患者根据手术规模(例如,双侧植入骨锚式植入物)和患者的合并症情况在医院住院1或2晚。

替代方案

不提倡同时进行大腿主要截肢和骨锚式假肢植入作为治疗方法。首先,在患者申请骨锚式假肢之前,应完成使用接受腔悬吊式假肢的康复计划。康复后,对假肢接受腔的满意度可能足够,从而无需使用骨锚式假肢。骨锚式植入手术的禁忌症包括严重糖尿病(伴有并发症)、严重骨畸形、骨骼未成熟、骨疾病(即慢性感染或转移)、正在进行化疗、严重血管疾病、原因不明的疼痛、肥胖(体重指数>30 kg/m)和吸烟。

原理

大约一半接受下肢主要截肢的患者能够使用接受腔悬吊式假肢较好地接受人造腿。然而,另一半患者会出现限制,导致假肢使用减少、活动能力下降和生活质量降低。由于所谓的“假关节”(即软组织界面),肢体与假肢之间的能量传递较差,并且明显的机械排列不齐很常见。此外,经胫骨截肢者可能会在残肢 - 接受腔界面处因活塞运动和吸力而感到刺激。这些问题会导致皮肤问题以及由于残肢尺寸波动而导致接受腔适配困难,从而降低总体满意度和对活动能力的信心。骨整合植入物在残肢和人造腿之间建立了直接的骨骼连接,其中能量传递最佳且机械排列得到根本改善。

预期结果

在我们中心进行的一项未发表的前瞻性研究中,对21例经胫骨截肢患者进行了为期5年的随访,这些患者接受了钛质胫骨骨整合植入物(BADAL X,OTN植入物),并额外采用近端横向锁定螺钉固定以实现初步稳定性。大多数患者为男性(71%),因创伤性截肢(67%),并接受了两阶段手术(64%)。使用经股骨截肢者问卷(Q - TFA)假肢使用评分(PUS)测量假肢佩戴时间,使用Q - TFA全球评分(GS)测量与健康相关的生活质量。将使用接受腔悬吊式假肢的术前基线值与骨锚式假肢治疗后的所有随访时间点进行比较,这两项测量均有显著改善:Q - TFA PUS基线53,6个月90,1年88,2年91,5年89;Q - TFA GS基线38,6个月71,1年80,2年77,5年78。对全球评分的第三个问题进行了单独评估。这个问题是:“你如何总结你作为截肢者的整体情况?”观察到明显的改善趋势,因为43%的患者在基线时表示他们的情况“极差”或“差”,而只有19%的患者表示他们的情况“好”或“极好”,在5年随访时,这一比例变为6%表示情况“差”,94%表示情况“好”或“极好”。在5年随访时,植入物存活率达到95.5%。有1例患者出现渐进性感染性植入物松动,导致经膝关节截肢。该患者因血管问题接受了初次经胫骨截肢,术前双功超声检查未显示腹主动脉 -髂动脉闭塞性疾病的迹象。然而,再次检查显示血管疾病进展,患者承认未戒烟。未发生骨感染、假体周围骨折、髓内柄断裂或无菌性松动。9例患者发生了12次轻度软组织感染事件,均通过口服抗生素成功治疗。9例患者还发生了12次重度软组织感染事件,8次通过口服抗生素成功治疗,分别有1例和3例需要静脉注射抗生素或手术治疗。这导致感染/植入物使用年比率为0.24。肉芽组织增生和造口组织冗余分别发生2次和4次。我们得出结论,这种治疗方法的中期结果是可以接受的,特别是对于非血管性截肢患者。自2020年以来,基于成本和便利性因素,我们将一期手术作为标准选择进行该手术,结果似乎与我们之前的两阶段策略没有差异(未发表数据)。

重要提示

术前植入物规划:手术应遵循全面的手术指南,并使用定制的植入物设计,目标是在一期完成手术。患者定位和设置:膝盖垫支撑可能有益。软组织标记:充分规划切除区域,并在手术入路前方规划造口(如果不可能,直接在伤口处)。软组织矫正和残余骨暴露:充分切除软组织冗余。带导向缩短的截骨术修正:使用水冷动力锯。髓腔准备和垂直截骨平面:使用透视引导钻孔。髓内组件插入:如果阻力较小,使用骨形态发生蛋白 - 2(InductOs;美敦力公司)和骨挤压植骨进行增强。使用横向锁定螺钉对植入物进行初步稳定。软组织塑形和缝合:不要在植入物上方缝合肌肉筋膜。造口创建和双锥插入:仅在进行骨重建的情况下进行两阶段手术,第二阶段在间隔10至12周后进行。绷带:绷带包扎48小时。术后成像和随访:我们机构的随访计划是术后6个月,然后是1、2、5和10年。引入康复方案:标准方案为4周,在一期手术后三周开始。如果疼痛评分在0至10分的量表上不超过5分,患者在康复开始时可以完全负重使用假肢。康复:制作视频以比较患者术后各时间点的活动能力并评估进展。结果和结论:植入物松动很少见,软组织感染通常在头两年经常发生,需要非手术治疗。

首字母缩略词和缩写

BAP = 骨锚式假肢;BMI = 体重指数;CT = 计算机断层扫描;OTI = 骨整合胫骨植入物;K线 = 克氏针;DCA = 双锥适配器;BIG = 骨挤压植骨

相似文献

1
Press-Fit Bone-Anchored Prosthesis for Individuals with Transtibial Amputation.
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2024 May 22;14(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00006. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
2
Press-Fit Bone-Anchored Prosthesis for Patients with Short Transfemoral Amputation.
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Feb 21;15(1). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00007. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
4
Revision Amputation with Press-Fit Osseointegration for Transfemoral Amputees.
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2022 Jun 1;12(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00068. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
5
Transcutaneous Osseointegrated Prosthesis Systems (TOPS) for Rehabilitation After Lower Limb Loss: Surgical Pearls.
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2024 Jan 16;14(1). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00010. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.
6
Revision of Press-Fit Bone-Anchored Prosthesis After Implant Failure.
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2024 Oct 24;14(4). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00005. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
7
Single-Stage Press-Fit Osseointegration of the Radius and Ulna for Rehabilitation After Trans-Forearm Amputation.
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2024 Jul 10;14(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00015. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
8
Surgical technique of a transcutaneous osseointegration prosthesis system (TOPS) for transtibial amputees.
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2025 Apr;37(2):89-100. doi: 10.1007/s00064-025-00888-8. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
10
Soft-Tissue Contouring and Nerve Management During Lower-Limb Osseointegration Surgery.
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Apr 21;15(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00074. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Erratum: Press-Fit Bone-Anchored Prosthesis for Individuals with Transtibial Amputation.
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Mar 10;15(1). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.ER.23.00006. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
2
Surgical technique of a transcutaneous osseointegration prosthesis system (TOPS) for transtibial amputees.
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2025 Apr;37(2):89-100. doi: 10.1007/s00064-025-00888-8. Epub 2025 Feb 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology of Limb Amputations and Prosthetic Use During COVID-19 Pandemic in the Netherlands.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Feb;105(2):280-286. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.07.012. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
2
Have Surgery and Implant Modifications Been Associated With Reduction in Soft Tissue Complications in Transfemoral Bone-anchored Prostheses?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Jul 1;481(7):1373-1384. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002535. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
5
Complications of bone-anchored prostheses for individuals with an extremity amputation: A systematic review.
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 9;13(8):e0201821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201821. eCollection 2018.
7
Gait rehabilitation for a patient with an osseointegrated prosthesis following transfemoral amputation.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2017 Feb;33(2):147-161. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2016.1265620. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
9
Determinants of skin problems of the stump in lower-limb amputees.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Jan;90(1):74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.07.015.
10
Use and satisfaction with prosthetic devices among persons with trauma-related amputations: a long-term outcome study.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Aug;80(8):563-71. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200108000-00003.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验