Saucke Megan C, Jacobson Nora, Chow Selina, McKinney Grace, Neuman Heather B
Wisconsin Surgical Outcomes Research Program, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Madison, WI.
Ann Surg. 2025 Jan 31. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006648.
To understand how breast cancer patients experience the surgical decision process and identify strategies surgeons can employ to empower patients to engage in decision-making.
Patient engagement in decision-making is associated with improved patient outcomes. Although, some patients prefer that their healthcare provider drive the decision, the benefits of engaging in decision-making hold true even for patients who prefer to defer to their provider.
We performed semi-structured interviews with patients that experienced low engagement in clinical trial A231701CD (n=30). We used qualitative content analysis to analyze data and organize it into overarching themes that represent experiences with decision-making.
Patients could be grouped based on their experiences with the decision process into those that wanted to defer, share, or drive the decision. Three domains differentiated patients between groups: (1) overall disposition toward the surgeon, (2) tendency to exchange information and ask questions, and (3) attitudes toward how their preferences should shape the treatment decision. We identified surgeon behaviors that could optimize patient engagement. These opportunities were observed across all patients, regardless of their experience with the decision process.
Surgeons can empower patients to engage in decision-making by getting to know patients as individuals, ensuring all treatment options are presented, and integrating patient preferences into the decision process. Through these actions, surgeons can help patients with varied preferences for decision-making engage in making high quality decisions that reflect patients' priorities. These suggestions may have the greatest impact on socially disadvantaged patients and help to reduce disparities in care.
了解乳腺癌患者如何经历手术决策过程,并确定外科医生可采用的策略,以促使患者参与决策。
患者参与决策与改善患者预后相关。尽管有些患者更希望由医疗服务提供者主导决策,但即使对于倾向于听从提供者意见的患者,参与决策的益处依然存在。
我们对在临床试验A231701CD中参与度较低的患者(n = 30)进行了半结构化访谈。我们采用定性内容分析法分析数据,并将其组织成代表决策经历的总体主题。
根据患者在决策过程中的经历,可将其分为希望听从、分享或主导决策的患者。三个领域区分了不同组的患者:(1)对外科医生的总体态度,(2)交流信息和提问的倾向,以及(3)对其偏好应如何影响治疗决策的态度。我们确定了可优化患者参与度的外科医生行为。在所有患者中都观察到了这些机会,无论他们在决策过程中的经历如何。
外科医生可以通过将患者作为个体了解、确保呈现所有治疗选择并将患者偏好纳入决策过程,来促使患者参与决策。通过这些行动,外科医生可以帮助对决策有不同偏好的患者做出反映患者优先事项的高质量决策。这些建议可能对社会弱势群体产生最大影响,并有助于减少护理差距。