Suppr超能文献

仪器辅助软组织松动术和体外冲击波疗法对桡侧肘痛患者的影响:一项随机单盲临床试验

Effects of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Individuals With Lateral Elbow Pain: A Randomized Single-Blind Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Gercek Hasan, Unuvar Bayram Sonmez, Aydoğdu Onur, Akkoyun Sert Ozlem, Sari Zubeyir

机构信息

Department of Therapy and Rehabilitation, Vocational School of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy Programme, Karatay University, Konya, Turkey.

Doctorate Program of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Institute of Health Sciences, Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Sport Rehabil. 2025 Jan 31;34(7):725-732. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2024-0237. Print 2025 Sep 1.

Abstract

CONTEXT

In lateral elbow pain (LEP), it is important to improve pain, grip strength, and function. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) methods on pain, grip strength, and function in LEP.

DESIGN

Randomized single-blind clinical trial.

METHODS

Forty-eight adults with LEP were randomly assigned to the IASTM, ESWT, and control groups. Home exercise consisting of special static stretching and eccentric strengthening exercises was given to the control group. The ESWT group received a total of 8 sessions of ESWT in addition to home exercise. The IASTM group received a total of 8 sessions of IASTM in addition to home exercise. The visual analog scale for pain, hydraulic hand dynamometer for grip strength, and Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation scale for functionality were used for assessment. Data were collected at baseline, after intervention, and at 4-weeks postintervention.

RESULTS

At the end of the treatment and the 4-week follow-up, a decrease in pain scores and improvement in muscle strength and functionality was detected in all 3 groups (P < .001). IASTM applications were more effective than ESWT and control groups in reducing pain both after application and at follow-up (P < .001), whereas ESWT application was also effective compared with the control group (P < .001). IASTM applications were more effective than the ESWT and control groups in reducing Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation total scores both after the applications and follow-up (P < .001). IASTM was more effective in grip strength than ESWT and control groups (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

It was determined that IASTM and ESWT treatments were effective in reducing pain and increasing grip strength and functionality in both the short and long term in patients with LEP. It was determined that IASTM treatment was superior to ESWT treatment in reducing pain and improving grip strength and functionality.

摘要

背景

在外侧肘疼痛(LEP)中,改善疼痛、握力和功能很重要。本研究的目的是比较器械辅助软组织松动术(IASTM)和体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)对LEP患者疼痛、握力和功能的影响。

设计

随机单盲临床试验。

方法

48名患有LEP的成年人被随机分配到IASTM组、ESWT组和对照组。对照组进行包括特殊静态拉伸和离心强化练习的家庭锻炼。ESWT组除家庭锻炼外,共接受8次ESWT治疗。IASTM组除家庭锻炼外,共接受8次IASTM治疗。使用视觉模拟疼痛量表、液压式握力计和患者网球肘功能评估量表进行评估。在基线、干预后和干预后4周收集数据。

结果

在治疗结束时和4周随访时,所有3组的疼痛评分均降低,肌肉力量和功能均得到改善(P <.001)。IASTM治疗在治疗后和随访时减轻疼痛方面比ESWT组和对照组更有效(P <.001),而ESWT治疗与对照组相比也有效(P <.001)。IASTM治疗在治疗后和随访时降低患者网球肘功能评估总分方面比ESWT组和对照组更有效(P <.001)。IASTM在握力方面比ESWT组和对照组更有效(P <.001)。

结论

确定IASTM和ESWT治疗在短期和长期内对LEP患者减轻疼痛、增加握力和改善功能均有效。确定IASTM治疗在减轻疼痛、改善握力和功能方面优于ESWT治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验