Haikal Mohammad, Helal Ahmed, Elforse Elsayed, El-Tantawy Ahmad, El-Sheikh Tarek, El-Rosasy Mahmoud, Snow Martyn
Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt; Department of Arthroscopy, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 Sep;34(9):2079-2089. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.017. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
External rotation (ER) deficit following Bankart repair and remplissage (BRR) is reported to be a major concern. The purpose of this study was to identify potential risk factors that correlate with increased postoperative ER deficit in a population that underwent BRR for recurrent anterior shoulder instability and glenoid bone loss (<20%).
A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed on 41 patients who underwent BRR for anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss of <20%. Inclusion criteria were a minimum of 2-year postoperative follow-up with available pre- and postoperative functional scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form [ASES] score and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index [WOSI]) and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Regression analysis was conducted to detect risk factors for postoperative ER deficit, including age, sex, number of dislocations, length of follow-up, Hill-Sachs interval (HSI), Hill-Sachs depth (HSD), sport participation, number of anchors used for remplissage, and hand dominance. A subanalysis was undertaken after dividing patients into 2 groups (deficit <20% and ≥20%). Correlation between postoperative scores and ER deficit was performed.
All patients showed marked improvement in postoperative WOSI and ASES compared to preoperative by a mean difference of 46.2 ± 19.9 and 29.6 ± 14.4, respectively. Compared with the opposite side, the mean reduction in external rotation at the side (ERs), external rotation in abduction (ERa), forward flexion, and internal rotation in abduction were 21.9% ± 15.5%, 14.3% ± 9.9%, 2.7% ± 1.9%, and 10% ± 6.2%, respectively. Univariate regression analysis showed that shorter postoperative time, larger HSI, and the use of 2 anchors were significantly associated with increased limitation of both ERs and ERa. Participation in sports was significantly associated with less ERs limitation. HSD was significantly associated with increased ERa limitation. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that larger HSI was significantly associated with increases in both ERs and ERa limitation. Time of final follow-up and number of anchors were significantly associated with ERs and ERa limitation, respectively. ER deficit ≥20% was significantly associated with a lower number of preoperative dislocations, shorter time of final follow-up, HSI, and 2 anchors used in remplissage. No correlations exist between functional scores and ER deficit. There were no recurrent dislocations.
The results show that postoperative ER deficit improves over time. Risk factors for increased postoperative ER deficit are larger HSI and use of more than 1 anchor for capsulotenodesis. There was no correlation between functional scores and ER deficit.
据报道,Bankart修复和 remplissage(BRR)术后外旋(ER)不足是一个主要问题。本研究的目的是确定在因复发性前肩不稳和关节盂骨丢失(<20%)而接受BRR的人群中,与术后ER不足增加相关的潜在风险因素。
对41例因前肩不稳伴关节盂骨丢失<20%而接受BRR的患者进行前瞻性收集数据的回顾性分析。纳入标准为术后至少随访2年,有术前和术后功能评分(美国肩肘外科医师标准化肩部评估表[ASES]评分和西安大略肩不稳指数[WOSI])以及术前磁共振成像。进行回归分析以检测术后ER不足的风险因素,包括年龄、性别、脱位次数、随访时间、Hill-Sachs间距(HSI)、Hill-Sachs深度(HSD)、运动参与情况、用于remplissage的锚钉数量以及利手。在将患者分为两组(不足<20%和≥20%)后进行亚分析。对术后评分与ER不足之间的相关性进行了分析。
与术前相比,所有患者术后WOSI和ASES均有显著改善,平均差异分别为46.2±19.9和29.6±14.4。与对侧相比,患侧外旋(ERs)、外展外旋(ERa)、前屈和外展内旋的平均减少量分别为21.9%±15.5%、14.3%±9.9%、2.7%±1.9%和10%±6.2%。单因素回归分析显示,术后时间较短、HSI较大以及使用2枚锚钉与ERs和ERa受限增加显著相关。参与运动与ERs受限较少显著相关。HSD与ERa受限增加显著相关。多因素回归分析显示,较大的HSI与ERs和ERa受限增加显著相关。末次随访时间和锚钉数量分别与ERs和ERa受限显著相关。ER不足≥20%与术前脱位次数较少、末次随访时间较短、HSI以及remplissage中使用2枚锚钉显著相关。功能评分与ER不足之间无相关性。无复发性脱位。
结果表明,术后ER不足随时间改善。术后ER不足增加的风险因素是较大的HSI和用于关节囊固定的锚钉超过1枚。功能评分与ER不足之间无相关性。