Zhang Tingting, Santostefano Christopher M, Harris Daniel, Coe Antoinette B, Zullo Andrew R, Gerlach Lauren B, Joshi Richa, Bynum Julie P W, Shireman Theresa I
Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2025 Apr;26(4):105480. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105480. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
To estimate the immediate and long-term effects of a visitor restriction policy on antipsychotic use in nursing home (NH) residents with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) during COVID-19.
A repeated cross-sectional study time series analysis was conducted using NH electronic health records (EHRs) from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021.
A large, multistate sample of NH residents living with ADRD.
We calculated weekly changes in facility-level prevalence of antipsychotic use using interrupted time series (ITS) to compare level and slope changes in antipsychotic use before, during, and after NH visitation restrictions. Generalized linear models with generalized estimating equations, logit link, binomial distribution, and AR-1 correlation structure were used for all ITS analyses. Final models were stratified by long- and short-stay residents and adjusted for NH-level covariates including resident demographics, clinical diagnoses, and nurse staffing.
We observed more than 8500 long-stay and 2700 short-stay NH residents with ADRD. Among long-stay residents, the weekly prevalence of antipsychotic use increased from 18.9% as of January 7, 2020, to 24.9% by December 31, 2021. For short-stay residents, antipsychotic use increased from 21.1% to 26.6% over this same window. The ITS analysis showed no meaningful changes in the relative rate of change in antipsychotic use during and after visitor restrictions, relative to pre-policy trends.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services visitation restriction policy had no meaningful impact on antipsychotic use among NH residents with ADRD. However, antipsychotic use increased over time for both long- and short-stay residents and remained above pre-pandemic levels by the end of 2021. Our findings emphasize the potential for increased reliance on pharmacotherapy to manage resident symptoms during public health emergencies. Future infection control efforts should prioritize safe interpersonal care delivery and consider policies that improve vigilance of medication utilization changes among high-risk populations.
评估访客限制政策对新冠疫情期间患有阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症(ADRD)的养老院(NH)居民使用抗精神病药物的即时和长期影响。
采用重复横断面研究时间序列分析,使用2020年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间NH的电子健康记录(EHR)。
一个居住在NH且患有ADRD的大型多州样本。
我们使用中断时间序列(ITS)计算设施层面抗精神病药物使用患病率的每周变化,以比较NH访客限制之前、期间和之后抗精神病药物使用的水平和斜率变化。所有ITS分析均使用具有广义估计方程、logit链接、二项分布和AR-1相关结构的广义线性模型。最终模型按长期和短期居住居民分层,并针对NH层面的协变量进行调整,包括居民人口统计学、临床诊断和护士人员配置。
我们观察了8500多名长期居住和2700多名短期居住的患有ADRD的NH居民。在长期居住居民中,抗精神病药物使用的每周患病率从2020年1月7日的18.9%增加到2021年12月31日的24.9%。对于短期居住居民,在同一时间段内,抗精神病药物使用从21.1%增加到26.6%。ITS分析显示,与政策实施前的趋势相比,访客限制期间和之后抗精神病药物使用的相对变化率没有有意义的变化。
医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的访客限制政策对患有ADRD的NH居民使用抗精神病药物没有有意义的影响。然而,长期和短期居住居民的抗精神病药物使用随时间增加,到2021年底仍高于疫情前水平。我们的研究结果强调了在公共卫生紧急情况期间增加对药物治疗以管理居民症状的潜在可能性。未来的感染控制措施应优先考虑安全的人际护理提供,并考虑改善对高危人群药物使用变化监测的政策。