Shaw K Aaron, Thornberg David, McClung Anna, Jo Chan-Hee, Erickson Mark, Vitale Michael, Luhmann Scott, Andras Lindsay, Sturm Peter, Matsumoto Hiroko, Ramo Brandon
Spine Division, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Spine Deform. 2025 May;13(3):929-938. doi: 10.1007/s43390-024-01029-0. Epub 2025 Feb 1.
The etiology of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) has been shown to significantly influence baseline parent-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures as assessed by the Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ). However, it remains unclear how etiology influences mid-term outcomes following growth friendly instrumentation (GFI) for EOS.
A retrospective review of a multi-center prospective spinal database was performed. Children undergoing primary distraction-based, GFI for EOS with complete baseline, 2-year, and 5-year post-surgical EOSQ were included. The identified children were subdivided by etiology as classified by the C-EOS system. EOSQ scores were compared over time according to etiology cohorts and between instrumentation types. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was defined as ≥ 20% change in domain score and compared across etiologies. Dominance analysis was used to assess for drivers of treatment satisfaction.
A total of 178 children (mean 7.3 ± 2.1 years, 51.1% female) were included. The most common etiology was neuromuscular (NM: 36.5%), with the majority of children treated with MCGR (N = 125). Significant differences between etiology groups were present with congenital and idiopathic cohorts demonstrating similar EOSQ domain scores that were significantly higher than neuromuscular and syndromic cohorts. In assessing clinically important changes in EOSQ scores over the 5-year follow-up period, neuromuscular and syndromic patients demonstrated the greatest capacity for improved outcomes. Instrumentation type had no influence on HRQoL scores at 5-year follow-up. Etiology was a driver of satisfaction with syndromic etiology and transfer domain score at 2 years follow-up associated with dissatisfaction.
Curve etiology remains a significant driver of HRQoL domains following growth-friendly instrumentation for EOS. Neuromuscular and syndromic patient have significantly lower domain scores. Despite this, or perhaps because of it, they also demonstrate the greatest capacity for clinically important improvement in HRQoL measures 5 years following intervention.
早发性脊柱侧凸(EOS)的病因已被证明会显著影响通过早发性脊柱侧凸问卷(EOSQ)评估的家长报告的基线健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)指标。然而,目前尚不清楚病因如何影响EOS生长友好型器械治疗(GFI)的中期结果。
对一个多中心前瞻性脊柱数据库进行回顾性研究。纳入接受基于撑开的原发性GFI治疗EOS且有完整基线、术后2年和5年EOSQ数据的儿童。根据C-EOS系统分类,将纳入的儿童按病因进行细分。根据病因队列和器械类型比较不同时间的EOSQ评分。最小临床重要差异(MCID)定义为领域评分变化≥20%,并在不同病因间进行比较。采用优势分析评估治疗满意度的驱动因素。
共纳入178例儿童(平均年龄7.3±2.1岁,51.1%为女性)。最常见的病因是神经肌肉性(NM:36.5%),大多数儿童接受了MCGR治疗(N = 125)。病因组之间存在显著差异,先天性和特发性队列的EOSQ领域评分相似,显著高于神经肌肉性和综合征性队列。在评估5年随访期内EOSQ评分的临床重要变化时,神经肌肉性和综合征性患者的改善结果能力最强。器械类型对5年随访时的HRQoL评分无影响。病因是满意度的驱动因素,综合征性病因和2年随访时的转移领域评分与不满意相关。
对于EOS的生长友好型器械治疗,曲线病因仍然是HRQoL领域的重要驱动因素。神经肌肉性和综合征性患者的领域评分显著较低。尽管如此,或者可能正因如此,他们在干预后5年的HRQoL指标方面也表现出最大的临床重要改善能力。