Akimoto Miho, Saeki Soichiro, Kiyomoto Yuki, Takeshima Hirosane, Higuchi Naofumi, Mori Takako, Osanai Yasuyo, Hinohara Chihaya, Inagaki Takeshi
Department of General Internal Medicine, Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1 Toyama, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan.
International Health Care Center, Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1 Toyama, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan.
Trop Med Health. 2025 Jan 31;53(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s41182-025-00684-x.
Air transport for medically complex patients presents unique challenges, particularly without specific guidelines for conditions such as pneumomediastinum or medical devices like peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC lines). Although organizations such as the Aerospace Medical Association (AsMA) and the International Air Transport Association (IATA) provide general recommendations for medical air travel, these guidelines often lack the precision required to address such complex clinical scenarios. Consequently, healthcare teams frequently face difficult decisions under constraints of time and resources, navigating the interplay of patient safety, autonomy, and logistical considerations.
This case involves a 30-year-old American woman with type 2 diabetes, obesity, and a recent history of pancreaticoduodenectomy, who was hospitalized in Japan with cellulitis and incidentally diagnosed with pneumomediastinum. She was treated with intravenous antibiotics and central venous nutrition administered via a PICC line. However, she requested an early discharge to return to the United States for family and financial reasons. Her travel insurer declined coverage, citing potential risks associated with pneumomediastinum. Ultimately, the patient discharged herself against medical advice; the PICC line was removed, and she transitioned to oral antibiotics for her journey home.
This case highlights the complexities of patient preferences, medical risks, and insurance limitations when evaluating air travel safety. The absence of specific guidelines for conditions such as pneumomediastinum and the use of medical devices highlights the need for condition-specific protocols. Effective communication and customized documentation, including modifications to the "Against Medical Advice" form proved essential in addressing both patient autonomy and the responsibilities of healthcare providers.
对患有复杂病症的患者进行空中转运面临着独特的挑战,尤其是在缺乏针对诸如纵隔气肿等病症或外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC 导管)等医疗设备的具体指南的情况下。尽管诸如航空航天医学协会(AsMA)和国际航空运输协会(IATA)等组织提供了医疗空中旅行的一般建议,但这些指南往往缺乏应对此类复杂临床情况所需的精确性。因此,医疗团队经常在时间和资源的限制下面临艰难决策,要在患者安全、自主性和后勤考虑之间进行权衡。
本病例涉及一名 30 岁的美国女性,患有 2 型糖尿病、肥胖症,近期有胰十二指肠切除术史,因蜂窝织炎在日本住院,偶然被诊断出患有纵隔气肿。她接受了静脉抗生素治疗,并通过 PICC 导管进行中心静脉营养支持。然而,由于家庭和经济原因,她要求提前出院返回美国。她的旅行保险公司以纵隔气肿相关的潜在风险为由拒绝承保。最终,患者自行出院,不听从医嘱;PICC 导管被拔除,她在回家途中改用口服抗生素。
本病例凸显了在评估空中旅行安全性时患者偏好、医疗风险和保险限制的复杂性。缺乏针对纵隔气肿等病症以及医疗设备使用的具体指南,凸显了制定针对特定病症的方案的必要性。有效的沟通和定制化的文件记录,包括对“不听从医嘱”表格的修改,在兼顾患者自主性和医疗服务提供者责任方面被证明至关重要。