Schneidewind Laila, Kiss Bernhard, Neumann Thomas, Kranz Jennifer, Zengerling Friedemann, Graf Sebastian, Graser Annabel, Uhlig Annemarie
Department of Hematology/Oncology, Ferdinand-Sauerbruchstr, University Medical Center Greifswald, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Department of Urology, University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2025 Feb 1;151(2):59. doi: 10.1007/s00432-025-06108-x.
To systematically analyze gender-specific differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) as well as adverse events and quality of Life (QoL) as secondary aims in NMIBC patients undergoing cytostatic intravesical chemotherapy.
A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on studies published between 1976 and 2024, following PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library were used as literature sources. No restrictions were made concerning language, study region or publication type. Data from 12 studies encompassing 1,527 patients were analyzed. Outcomes were assessed using random-effects models, with gender as a primary variable of interest. A risk of bias assessment was done using the ROBINS-I tool or RoB2 as appropriate.
The pooled analysis demonstrated no statistically significant gender-specific differences in RFS (HR = 1.0625, 95% CI 0.8094-1.0526) or PFS (HR = 1.0861, 95% CI 0.7038-1.6760). Data on CSS and OS were insufficient for meaningful conclusions. Two included studies analyzed in univariate or multivariate regression gender as risk factor for recurrence or progression, but gender was not a significant risk factor. Adverse events and QoL outcomes were notably underreported, with no gender-specific data available.
While this study found no significant gender-based differences in NMIBC outcomes following intravesical chemotherapy, the findings are limited by the small number of studies, underrepresentation of women, and inconsistent reporting of critical outcomes. Future research should prioritize gender-focused analyses and explore the molecular and genetic basis of potential differences to inform precision medicine and equitable care.
系统分析接受膀胱内化疗的非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)患者在无复发生存期(RFS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、癌症特异性生存期(CSS)和总生存期(OS)方面的性别差异,并将不良事件和生活质量(QoL)作为次要目标进行分析。
按照PRISMA指南,对1976年至2024年发表的研究进行系统评价和荟萃分析。使用MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆作为文献来源。对语言、研究地区或发表类型不设限制。分析了12项研究中的数据,共纳入1527例患者。使用随机效应模型评估结果,将性别作为主要感兴趣变量。使用ROBINS-I工具或RoB2工具(视情况而定)进行偏倚风险评估。
汇总分析表明,在RFS(风险比[HR]=1.0625,95%置信区间[CI]0.8094-1.0526)或PFS(HR=1.0861,95%CI 0.7038-1.6760)方面,未发现具有统计学意义的性别差异。关于CSS和OS的数据不足以得出有意义的结论。两项纳入研究在单变量或多变量回归中分析了性别作为复发或进展的风险因素,但性别不是显著风险因素。不良事件和QoL结果的报告明显不足,没有可用的性别特异性数据。
虽然本研究未发现膀胱内化疗后NMIBC结局存在显著的性别差异,但研究结果受到研究数量少、女性代表性不足以及关键结局报告不一致的限制。未来的研究应优先进行以性别为重点的分析,并探索潜在差异的分子和遗传基础,以为精准医学和公平医疗提供依据。