Janig Christoph, Hummel Thomas, Berres Manfred, Willms Arnulf, Piepho Tim
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Bundeswehr Central Hospital, Koblenz, Germany.
Medical Coy of the Airborne Regiment 31, Seedorf, Germany.
J Spec Oper Med. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):11-16. doi: 10.55460/SKUJ-KOPM.
Under normal conditions, the use of a supraglottic airway device (SAD) is safe and effective. There are situations in military environments in which such devices must be used in the dark (e.g., to conceal the team's position). The aim of our study was to evaluate the use of different SADs using night vision goggles (NVG) on a manikin.
A group of 53 medically trained soldiers (paramedics, emergency medical technicians [EMTs] and Combat First Responders Bravo) was given a brief demonstration of how to place three different types of SAD in a manikin's airway. This was followed by randomized use in ambient light and then, after the room was darkened, with NVG. Differences in terms of placement success, placement time, and observed usage problems were compared.
Attempt success rates were >91% for all SADs used both in ambient light and with NVG. Median placement times differed significantly between ambient light and NVG (ambient light/NVG: i-gel, 7.2/15.1s; standard laryngeal mask airway [LMA], 15.4/21.5s; laryngeal tube [LT], 13.4/24.3s). In the direct comparison of the various SADs, the i-gel laryngeal mask airway was placed significantly faster than a standard LMA (P<.0001) and the LT (P<.0001).
Our study proves that the use of NVG has a measurable impact on the speed of placement but does not prolong placement to a clinically significant extent on a manikin. In addition, there was no significant difference in the placement success for each SAD in ambient light or with NVG. Furthermore, all participants were able to read the size information on the various SADs when wearing NVG and were thus able to make a proper size selection. It would, however, make use easier if additional size markings were added. SADs can be applied quickly and safely on the manikin even when NVG are worn. Differences in the use of the various types of SAD are not relevant from a clinical perspective. Using NVG while placing a SAD seems to be safe for the patient and might increase safety for the care provider in tactical situations by maintaining concealment in dark environments.
在正常情况下,使用声门上气道装置(SAD)是安全有效的。在军事环境中,存在必须在黑暗中使用此类装置的情况(例如,为了隐藏团队位置)。我们研究的目的是在人体模型上评估使用夜视镜(NVG)时不同SAD的使用情况。
一组53名经过医学培训的士兵(护理人员、急救医疗技术员[EMT]和战斗急救员Bravo)接受了关于如何在人体模型气道中放置三种不同类型SAD的简短演示。随后在自然光下随机使用,然后在房间变暗后使用NVG。比较了放置成功率、放置时间和观察到的使用问题方面的差异。
在自然光和使用NVG的情况下,所有使用的SAD的尝试成功率均>91%。自然光和NVG之间的中位放置时间有显著差异(自然光/NVG:i-gel,7.2/15.1秒;标准喉罩气道[LMA],15.4/21.5秒;喉管[LT],13.4/24.3秒)。在各种SAD的直接比较中,i-gel喉罩气道的放置速度明显快于标准LMA(P<.0001)和LT(P<.0001)。
我们的研究证明,使用NVG对放置速度有可测量的影响,但在人体模型上不会将放置时间延长到临床上显著的程度。此外,每种SAD在自然光或使用NVG时的放置成功率没有显著差异。此外,所有参与者在佩戴NVG时都能够读取各种SAD上的尺寸信息,因此能够进行正确的尺寸选择。然而,如果添加额外的尺寸标记,使用会更方便。即使佩戴NVG,SAD也可以快速安全地应用于人体模型。从临床角度来看,各种类型SAD的使用差异无关紧要。在放置SAD时使用NVG对患者似乎是安全的,并且通过在黑暗环境中保持隐蔽性,可能会增加战术情况下护理人员的安全性。