Ali Nabila M H, Chawner Samuel J R A, Kushan-Wells Leila, Bearden Carrie E, Mulle Jennifer Gladys, Pollak Rebecca M, Gur Raquel E, Chung Wendy K, Owen Michael J, van den Bree Marianne B M
Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Cardiff University, UK.
Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Psychology, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles, USA.
EBioMedicine. 2025 Feb;112:105521. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105521. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
A number of Neurodevelopmental risk Copy Number Variants (ND-CNVs) and Single Gene Variants (SGVs) are strongly linked to elevated likelihood of autism. However, few studies have examined the impact on autism phenotypes across a wide range of rare variant genotypes.
This study compared Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) scores (total and subdomains: social, communication, repetitive behaviour) in 1314 young people with one of thirty rare variant genotypes (15 ND-CNVs; n = 1005, 9.2 ± 3.5 years and 15 SGVs; n = 309, 8.3 ± 4.0 years). Comparisons were also conducted with young people without known genetic conditions (controls; n = 460, 10.6 ± 3.4 years) and with idiopathic autism (n = 480, 8.6 ± 3.2 years).
The prevalence of indicative autism (SCQ ≥ 22) was higher in those with a rare variant genotype compared to controls (32% vs 2%; OR = 43.1, CI = 6.6-282.2, p < 0.001) and in those with SGVs compared to ND-CNVs (53% vs 25%; OR = 4.00, CI = 2.2-7.3, p = 0.002). The prevalence of indicative autism varied considerably across the 30 rare variant genotypes (range 10-85%). SGVs were associated with greater impairment in total, social, communication and repetitive behaviour subdomains than ND-CNVs. However, genotype explained limited variation in these scores (η between 11.8 and 21.4%), indicating more convergence than divergence in autism phenotype across rare variant genotypes. Comparisons with young people with idiopathic autism indicated no differences compared to those with ND-CNVs, whereas those with SGVs showed greater communication and less repetitive behaviour.
The likelihood of autism was higher across all rare variant genotypes, with individuals with SGVs showing higher prevalence and greater impairment compared to those with ND-CNVs. Despite subdomain-specific patterns, there was no strong evidence for specific genotype-phenotype associations. This suggests that rare variant genotypes alone may have limited predictive value for autism phenotypes and that other factors like polygenic risk and the environment are likely to play a role. Further research is needed in order to understand these influences, improve risk prediction and inform genetic counselling and interventions.
This work was funded by the Tackling Multimorbidity at Scale Strategic Priorities Fund programme (MR/W014416/1) (van den Bree) delivered by the Medical Research Council and the National Institute for Health Research in partnership with the Economic and Social Research Council and in collaboration with the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. NIMH U01 MH119738-01 (van den Bree), IMAGINE study (Medical Research Council UK: MR/T033045/1; MR/N022572/1; and MR/L011166/1) (van den Bree) and Medical Research Council UK Centre Grant (MR/L010305/1) (Owen). SJRAC is funded by a Medical Research Foundation Fellowship (MRF-058-0015-F-CHAW). We would also like to acknowledge NIH 1R01MH110701-01A1 (PI Mulle), U01MH119736 (CEB), R21MH116473 (CEB), and R01MH085953 (CEB), and the Simons Foundation (SFARI Explorer Award to CEB).
许多神经发育风险拷贝数变异(ND-CNVs)和单基因变异(SGVs)与自闭症发生可能性升高密切相关。然而,很少有研究考察广泛的罕见变异基因型对自闭症表型的影响。
本研究比较了1314名具有30种罕见变异基因型之一的年轻人(15种ND-CNVs;n = 1005,9.2±3.5岁和15种SGVs;n = 309,8.3±4.0岁)的社会沟通问卷(SCQ)得分(总分及子领域:社交、沟通、重复行为)。还与无已知遗传疾病的年轻人(对照组;n = 460,10.6±3.4岁)和特发性自闭症患者(n = 480,8.6±3.2岁)进行了比较。
与对照组相比,具有罕见变异基因型的个体中指示性自闭症(SCQ≥22)的患病率更高(32%对2%;OR = 43.1,CI = 6.6 - 282.2,p < 0.001),与ND-CNVs相比,具有SGVs的个体中指示性自闭症的患病率更高(53%对25%;OR = 4.00,CI = 2.2 - 7.3,p = 0.002)。在30种罕见变异基因型中,指示性自闭症的患病率差异很大(范围为10 - 85%)。与ND-CNVs相比,SGVs在总分、社交、沟通和重复行为子领域的损害更大。然而,基因型对这些得分的解释变异有限(η在11.8%至21.4%之间),表明在罕见变异基因型的自闭症表型中,趋同多于差异。与特发性自闭症患者的比较表明,与ND-CNVs患者相比无差异,而具有SGVs的患者表现出更大的沟通障碍和更少的重复行为。
所有罕见变异基因型个体患自闭症的可能性都更高,与ND-CNVs个体相比,具有SGVs的个体患病率更高且损害更大。尽管存在子领域特异性模式,但没有强有力的证据支持特定的基因型-表型关联。这表明仅罕见变异基因型对自闭症表型的预测价值可能有限,多基因风险和环境等其他因素可能发挥作用。需要进一步研究以了解这些影响,改善风险预测,并为遗传咨询和干预提供信息。
这项工作由医学研究理事会和国家卫生研究院联合经济和社会研究理事会以及工程和物理科学研究理事会共同资助的应对大规模多重疾病战略优先基金计划(MR/W014416/1)(范登布里)资助。美国国立精神卫生研究所U01 MH119738 - 01(范登布里)、IMAGINE研究(英国医学研究理事会:MR/T033045/1;MR/N022572/1;以及MR/L011166/1)(范登布里)和英国医学研究理事会中心基金(MR/L010305/1)(欧文)。SJRAC由医学研究基金会奖学金(MRF - 058 - 0015 - F - CHAW)资助。我们还要感谢美国国立卫生研究院1R01MH110701 - 01A1(首席研究员穆勒)、U01MH119736(CEB)、R21MH116473(CEB)和R01MH085953(CEB),以及西蒙斯基金会(CEB获得西蒙斯基金会探索者奖)。