Çarkoğlu Can, Eason Sarah H
Department of Human Development and Family Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Department of Human Development and Family Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2025 May;253:106191. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106191. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
Research shows that parent-child math activities in the home positively relate to children's math learning. Although there is evidence suggesting that the nature of parent guidance during these interactions is important for children's math learning, it is unclear how parents respond to preschoolers' errors and correct math statements and whether responses vary across activity contexts. We examined parents' responses to errors and correct statements during structured math activities with 49 dyads of parents and 4- and 5-year-olds. Dyads were assigned to either an Informal Learning condition (n = 25) or a Formal Learning condition (n = 24). We identified instances where children responded correctly or incorrectly to math prompts and coded parents' feedback based on the extent to which it supported children's autonomy and learning. Overall, parents most frequently responded in ways that encouraged children's continued math engagement and thinking (elaborative guidance). However, multiple regression analyses revealed that parents were more likely to not respond to errors during informal learning than during formal learning, and parents were more likely to give the correct answer following an error during formal learning compared with during informal learning. Parents in both conditions were equally likely to offer elaborative support following errors. Moreover, parents did not differ in their responses following children's correct statements across conditions. These findings suggest, irrespective of activity context, that parents can realize opportunities to effectively support preschoolers' math learning. Yet, given differences in parents' responses to errors, the findings have implications as to how we can tailor recommendations to promote high-quality parent-child math interactions.
研究表明,家庭中的亲子数学活动与孩子的数学学习呈正相关。尽管有证据表明,在这些互动过程中家长指导的性质对孩子的数学学习很重要,但目前尚不清楚家长如何回应学龄前儿童的错误并纠正数学陈述,以及这些回应在不同的活动情境中是否存在差异。我们研究了49对家长与4至5岁孩子在结构化数学活动中,家长对孩子错误和正确陈述的回应。这些亲子对被分配到非正式学习组(n = 25)或正式学习组(n = 24)。我们确定了孩子对数学提示回答正确或错误的情况,并根据家长反馈对孩子自主性和学习的支持程度进行编码。总体而言,家长最常采用鼓励孩子持续参与数学活动和思考的方式做出回应(详尽指导)。然而,多元回归分析显示,与正式学习相比,家长在非正式学习中更有可能对孩子的错误不做回应,并且在正式学习中,与非正式学习相比,家长在孩子出错后更有可能给出正确答案。两种情况下的家长在孩子出错后提供详尽支持的可能性相同。此外,在孩子做出正确陈述后,不同情境下家长的回应没有差异。这些发现表明,无论活动情境如何,家长都能够找到有效支持学龄前儿童数学学习的机会。然而,鉴于家长对错误的回应存在差异,这些发现对于我们如何定制建议以促进高质量的亲子数学互动具有启示意义。