• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of artificial intelligence chatbots in delivering quality anaesthesia information for patients undergoing laparoscopic hernioplasty.人工智能聊天机器人在为接受腹腔镜疝修补术的患者提供高质量麻醉信息方面的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2025 Apr;134(4):1261-1263. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.01.004. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
2
Assessing the quality and readability of patient education materials on chemotherapy cardiotoxicity from artificial intelligence chatbots: An observational cross-sectional study.评估人工智能聊天机器人提供的关于化疗心脏毒性的患者教育材料的质量和可读性：一项观察性横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Apr 11;104(15):e42135. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042135.
3
Assessing the Readability of Patient Education Materials on Cardiac Catheterization From Artificial Intelligence Chatbots: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study.评估人工智能聊天机器人提供的心脏导管插入术患者教育材料的可读性：一项观察性横断面研究。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 4;16(7):e63865. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63865. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
AI Chatbots as Sources of STD Information: A Study on Reliability and Readability.作为性传播疾病信息来源的人工智能聊天机器人：可靠性与可读性研究
J Med Syst. 2025 Apr 3;49(1):43. doi: 10.1007/s10916-025-02178-z.
5
Readability, quality and accuracy of generative artificial intelligence chatbots for commonly asked questions about labor epidurals: a comparison of ChatGPT and Bard.生成式人工智能聊天机器人针对分娩硬膜外麻醉常见问题的可读性、质量和准确性：ChatGPT与Bard的比较
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2025 Feb;61:104317. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104317. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
6
Comparative Analysis of Accuracy, Readability, Sentiment, and Actionability: Artificial Intelligence Chatbots (ChatGPT and Google Gemini) versus Traditional Patient Information Leaflets for Local Anesthesia in Eye Surgery.准确性、可读性、情感倾向和可操作性的比较分析：人工智能聊天机器人（ChatGPT和谷歌Gemini）与眼科手术局部麻醉传统患者信息手册的对比
Br Ir Orthopt J. 2024 Aug 19;20(1):183-192. doi: 10.22599/bioj.377. eCollection 2024.
7
Assessment of readability, reliability, and quality of ChatGPT®, BARD®, Gemini®, Copilot®, Perplexity® responses on palliative care.评估 ChatGPT®、BARD®、 Gemini®、Copilot®、Perplexity® 在姑息治疗方面的可读性、可靠性和质量。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Aug 16;103(33):e39305. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039305.
8
Accuracy and Readability of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Vasectomy-Related Questions: Public Beware.人工智能聊天机器人对输精管切除术相关问题回答的准确性和可读性：公众需谨慎。
Cureus. 2024 Aug 28;16(8):e67996. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67996. eCollection 2024 Aug.
9
Performance of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots on Glaucoma Questions Adapted From Patient Brochures.人工智能聊天机器人对改编自患者手册的青光眼问题的回答情况。
Cureus. 2024 Mar 23;16(3):e56766. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56766. eCollection 2024 Mar.
10
Assessing the readability, quality and reliability of responses produced by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity regarding most frequently asked keywords about low back pain.评估ChatGPT、Gemini和Perplexity针对有关腰痛的最常见关键词所给出回答的可读性、质量和可靠性。
PeerJ. 2025 Jan 22;13:e18847. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18847. eCollection 2025.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating AI-Generated Patient Education Guides: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT and Deepseek.评估人工智能生成的患者教育指南：ChatGPT与豆包的比较研究。 需注意，原文中是ChatGPT和Deepseek，你提供的原文有误，我按照正确的Deepseek进行了翻译，若实际需求是其他，请告知。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 3;17(6):e85277. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85277. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence Must Operate Ethically in Health Care and Not Be Prone to Racist or Sexist Biases.人工智能在医疗保健领域必须合乎道德地运行，且不应存在种族主义或性别歧视偏见。
Anesth Analg. 2025 May 1;140(5):1099-1104. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000007140.
2
A Call to Address AI "Hallucinations" and How Healthcare Professionals Can Mitigate Their Risks.呼吁应对人工智能“幻觉”以及医疗专业人员如何降低其风险。
Cureus. 2023 Sep 5;15(9):e44720. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44720. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
A Review of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare.人工智能在医疗保健领域的作用综述。
J Pers Med. 2023 Jun 5;13(6):951. doi: 10.3390/jpm13060951.
4
Online information for incisional hernia repair: What are patients reading?切口疝修补术的在线信息：患者在阅读什么？
Surgeon. 2023 Aug;21(4):e195-e200. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2022.12.002. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
5
Inguinal hernia repair: toward Asian guidelines.腹股沟疝修补术：迈向亚洲指南。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2015 Feb;8(1):16-23. doi: 10.1111/ases.12141.
6
A comparative analysis of the quality of patient education materials from medical specialties.医学专业患者教育材料质量的比较分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jul 8;173(13):1257-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6060.
7
Effectiveness of empathy in general practice: a systematic review.全科医学中同理心的有效性：系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Jan;63(606):e76-84. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X660814.
8
Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: survey of five common health topics.表面上可信网站上信息的准确性：对五个常见健康主题的调查
BMJ. 2002 Mar 9;324(7337):581-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.581.

Comparison of artificial intelligence chatbots in delivering quality anaesthesia information for patients undergoing laparoscopic hernioplasty.

作者信息

Singh Ram, Gondode Prakash, Duggal Sakshi, Kumar Amit, Nayak Sudhansu Sekhar

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Department of Anaesthesiology Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2025 Apr;134(4):1261-1263. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.01.004. Epub 2025 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2025.01.004
PMID:39893065
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11947555/
Abstract
摘要