Zhang Yingrui, Zhang Haoyang, Liu Ruoxin, Jin Shan, Huo Tianqi, Wei Huishan, Qin Lizheng
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial & Head and Neck Oncology, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial & Head and Neck Oncology, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2025 May;139(5):509-520. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2024.11.089. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
Temporomandibular joint disorders can significantly impact individuals' physical and mental health. Conservative treatments are often recommended in the initial stage of the treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of occlusal splints compared with other conservative treatments.
Relevant literature published before 31 December 2023 was systematically searched through PubMed, Medline, Cochrane and EMBASE databases. Randomized controlled trials were selected for a meta-analysis.
The study included a total of 18 articles which revealed that occlusal splints were not superior to other conservative therapy for pain management (0.03 [-0.14, 0.20], P=0.74) and mouth opening (-0.24 [-0.59, 0.11]; P=0.18) in patients. However, we found that occlusal splints were more effective than counseling in improving pain, and it was significantly more effective at improving mouth opening than the placebo occlusal splint and psychological counselling. In addition, occlusal splints significantly reduced the incidence of clicking (OR 0.39 [0.22, 0.67]; P=0.0006).
The meta-analysis has shown that occlusal splints reduce the incidence of clicking. Occlusal splints were more effective than counseling and placebo occlusal splints in improving pain and opening. The selection of appropriate treatment methods according to the actual situation of patients can improve treatment efficiency.
颞下颌关节紊乱症会对个体的身心健康产生重大影响。在治疗初期通常推荐采用保守治疗。本研究旨在评估咬合板与其他保守治疗方法相比的疗效。
通过PubMed、Medline、Cochrane和EMBASE数据库系统检索了2023年12月31日前发表的相关文献。选择随机对照试验进行荟萃分析。
该研究共纳入18篇文章,结果显示在疼痛管理方面(0.03 [-0.14, 0.20],P = 0.74)以及患者张口度方面(-0.24 [-0.59, 0.11];P = 0.18),咬合板并不优于其他保守治疗方法。然而,我们发现咬合板在改善疼痛方面比咨询更有效,并且在改善张口度方面比安慰剂咬合板和心理咨询显著更有效。此外,咬合板显著降低了弹响的发生率(比值比0.39 [0.22, 0.67];P = 0.0006)。
荟萃分析表明咬合板可降低弹响的发生率。在改善疼痛和张口度方面,咬合板比咨询和安慰剂咬合板更有效。根据患者的实际情况选择合适的治疗方法可提高治疗效率。